Agrarian Socialism

Why isn’t Holla Forums agrarian socialist?

Other urls found in this thread:

web.archive.org/web/20161216053651/http://www.newgeography.com/content/003945-health-happiness-and-density
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Because this place is infested with city-dwelling intellectuals who'll need to be shot after the revolution. Some of them probably even wear glasses.

Because diversifying your society makes it fault tolerant

What?

Can you read? Can you read this?

yes

If anything, the reverse is true. Division of labor doesn't mean redundancy, it means everyone does some extremely narrow task that no one else can.

Because its 2017.

You are thinkIng of people like cogs. A more technologically oriented society could actually make those physical cogs instead of pissing their lives away in a field.

Was Jefferson right?

Reminder that only the luddite on this board are the true revolutionaries, the other are utopians who want to transform the world in Brave New World without classes

Really bad take.

No it's not.

AnPrim will win! Climate change is on our side!

anprim=/=luddism

Keeping society intact at an arbitrarily lower tech standard will just restart technological development in short order, user. Only through total societal collapse can humanity live for several hundred thousand years more without running into this trouble.

There’s nothing wrong with farm work. It’s less alienating then being a cashier at McDonalds.

Reminder that cities are shit.
web.archive.org/web/20161216053651/http://www.newgeography.com/content/003945-health-happiness-and-density

There's nothing wrong with automating farm work.

what is the practical difference between a primitivist and an agrarian utopian

It's utopian

Because I'm not a reactionary

"agrarian socialism" is just Mao's redwashed version of feudalism.

He was.

peasants are petty-bourgeois.

Agrarians don’t want primivitism. Agrarians see farm work as important and as the best profession to work in and rural communities as having stronger communities bonds and less atomized.


web.archive.org/web/20161216053651/http://www.newgeography.com/content/003945-health-happiness-and-density

How so, they work harder then you?

umm no sweetie

It’s determined by if you produce more labor then the labor time of the goods you consume.

Wrong

A barista working at Starbucks is more of a prole than a farmer working very hard for himself

Where are the proofs?


Baristas aren’t socially nessicary labor.

...

I made a claim. You just said wrong. You haven’t disproved me.

Baristas aren't socially necessary labor but they are still wage laborers, unlike land owning farmers

underrated reply

do you even know what that means?

thats giving the jobs proletariat needs to the machines you idiot

marx was right, you're a reactionary that needs to shut up

Goddamit have you ever read a single book in your entire pathetic life?

cant fight imperialism with cows

Wel if Porky has no cows he will starve.

I guess Über drivers aren’t prols then.

bump

???

Agrarianism is backwards and incapable of building socialism.

How so?

They are petite bourgeoisie technically