Why do red liberals make pretend there is a meaningful distinction between the tyranny of capital and the tyranny of...

Why do red liberals make pretend there is a meaningful distinction between the tyranny of capital and the tyranny of fascism?

"tyranny of fascism" doesn't mean anything.
fascism isn't a form of government or a mode of production. it's about as much a "thing" as Juche is: it's nothing.
what you mean is the tyranny of oligarchy

...

Fascism is deviation, an heresy of Marxism ideologically. National syndicalism in combination to Marxist elements within socialist parties of Europe gave birth to the fascism. At its ideological core, it is creation of the left.

forgot the shitposting flag.

wew lad

You should read on fascist literature to get into its core. Fascist corporation has lot more to do with syndicates than you might want to admit.

You still have the same shitposting flag on.

Go on…

There is very little to add into that. Early fascist movements mostly derived their politics form mixture of social democrats(who were still nominally Marxist) and national syndicalist ideologies such as Sorelism.

...

There's a difference
Anyone here would rather live in a lover democracy than a right-wing dictatorship

And the Republican party was originally started by communists and socialists, blah blah blah

Liberal democracy*

The broader ideological division between social democratic parties and socialist ones came after the ww1. Ideologically social democratic parties separated form Marxism doctrinally only by 70`s.

History matters. Without the syndicalist movement there would have been no fascism in Italy and by extension in Germany.

But the fascists of Italy started off as strike breakers

To attack against the enemies of the working class, the pacifists and German sympathizers. Socialists were the outside group and enemies of the public during the war, as we can see form French mutanies in the western front and complete collapse in form of soviets in the east. Similarly the socialist elements in Italy attempted divert their effects.


Ideologically they are an synthesis for nationalists and socialists, rejecting both the bourgeois and liberal values.

I would also like to add that most fascist leaders started as revolutionary syndicalists and followers of Sorelianism.

that's not the time period of "early fascist movements'?

It is considering that fascist movements started in the 1920`s.

at which point the SPD wasn't even remotely Marxist.

Expect in party line.
Expect in defining socialism.
Expect in theoretical goals.

right… being controlled by oligarchs with red promises is totally Marxist 👌

yeah sure, "shitposting flag"