EPIC MOLYMEME INTERVIEW

Former 'Antifa' Speaks Out!
'Steve' chronicles his life journey from "Anti-style" anarcho-communism to neo-conservatism:
youtu.be/PN2ZTpqr8sQ

"Anti-style" is supposed to be "Antifa-style"

Wow, I really like this picture and I'm not watching that shit.

fuck you OP you can't make me click that shit

This is what happens to most ancoms tbh. Nor surprising given how childish and utopian their ideology is.

wow an anarkiddy goes full neocon never seen that before

Still watching it. So far there is no indication this Steve guy became pro-war (aka neo-con).

If the guy was a Nazbol he’d never become right-wing. It’s always Anarchists and Trots that become right-wingers.

Because he would already be one. Nazbols are right-wing.

ONE

$

MAN

more news at 11

WAKE ME UP

I CAN'T WAKE UP

SAVE MEEEE

you're thinking of trots

This.

Being left or right wing depends on your economic positions, not your social ones. Nazbol is pro-socialism.

The guy was never a part of Antifa and says nothing about Antifa. Both the thumbnail and title of the video are misleading. GG Molymeme.

still waiting for his reunion with Chomsky

ONE NOTHING WRONG WITH ME

staged interview and now coming here to colect the clicks.
we don't take kindly on that leech Stefan "just 1 dolla?" Mill around here

When Jamal has dat good dick weed

...

you losers are so fucking desperate

Nice try rightie.

Uphold Marxism-Social Democracy but only for ethnic Russiansism!

He's right, fuckwit.

...

Stay mad utopian.

wow that's utterly pathetic, don't you have some kill idpol kill the trannies memes to go shill

Aren't you suppose to work on your utopia that'll only last one second.

is this all you have? it's been known forever this is fake everynotice the radio station shilling? for your everything is a psyop you sure take anything that makes your better look bad without question

I have no idea why this subthread exists. This comment only exists to continue it.

I mean you know it's true. Anarchists are a huge joke.

Look a retard came out of the closet to join the rest of the idiots in their ideological ghetto, we're better off without these walking disasters.

Whattefuck are you guys talking about, it's a lot more common for marxists, especially trots, to become conservative at later age

...

He must've hit his head and become retarded.

Became a neo-con? Was he Jewish?

Because a title that would say " Former leftist, turned himself away from leftism, and talks about it" would be not such a great title. Treating Antifa movement like a secret Agency, gets waay more views

former leftist speaks out

Not a bad interview, at least once they get over the specifics of his childhood.( that moly-meme is obviously trying to fit in with his ideological narrative)
It's extremely useful to try to understand what drives people from our movement, especially when they are as articulate as this guy.

I mean anarchism is basically communism for people who don't want *their* stuff taken away when the revolution comes.

Those are some seriously low standards.

The new influx of "HEH KID I USED TO BE A COMMIE I READ ALL OF CAPITAL AND I LEARNED IT WAS WRONG BECAUSE HUMAN NATURE" reminds me strongly of the lunatic fringe of Christians in the 90s claiming to be ex-satanic warlocks who were lulled into Satan's sweet grip by Pokemon and the Telletubbies. It reeks of bullshit, but its followers are too far gone to tell.

Communisim and democracy are exactly the same: they both assume that (a) men require governance and (b) men are capable of governing themselves.

In Communism, this is exhibited in the fact that men are required to distribute resources to and on behalf of other men - if men can do such a thing, they can do it themselves, without an intermediary; if they can't, then the intermediaries, too, are untrustworthy.

In democratic systems, the vote is the proxy: the balance of men are assumed to be capable of voting into office candidates who will, on the whole, act in the interest of the whole, and thus make decisions benefitting the whole; however, if men are capable of doing such complex analysis of another person's motives, competency, and future actions, and weighing them against their own best interest, then they are fully capable of managing themselves without government.

Both are two faces of the same unwholesome entity.

Anarchy and dictatorship are the only two political systems which are not self contradictory: anarchy, because it assumes without exception that men can govern themselves; dictatorship because it assumes that men can NOT govern themselves and require unilateral force to guide them.