Is he right, Holla Forums? Is America really on the fast track to outright fascism...

godsandradicals.org/2017/08/11/the-world-has-already-ended-and-you-may-die/

Is he right, Holla Forums? Is America really on the fast track to outright fascism, and not just standard neo-conservative dickery?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Repatriation
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I don't know if he's write but its a pretty good piece ps critiques of neoconservatism going around in the Bush years were persuasive on the point that in-debted to fascism and quasi-fascist itself

Well, actually, it's typed

My bad

America is going to go out like Germany in the 30s and 40s. Our empire is decaying and our elites are quickly losing the ability to project force through the usual "democratic" means. They will eventually become fascists.

So I guess all those comparisons to Weimer Germany are somewhat accurate?

You could make a decent argument that America has been fascist since FDR. There was a degree of mutual admiration between Mussolini and FDR, for example. Anyway, though racialism may be on the rise in America, nothing Trump says is anything new in America. We deported full-blown American citizens back to Mexico before: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Repatriation and journalists have been treated far worse in earlier historical periods.

This author also displays the idiocy typical of anarchists and fails to realize that the radical left are at the moment no more than useful idiots for the liberal wing of the establishment. If CNN is doing positive puff pieces on you and you're supposed to be speaking truth to power, you probably went wrong somewhere, or you're a useful idiot and haven't realized it.

Perhaps, but America was better at keeping up the false appearance of a democratic society. In recent years, however, this seems to be falling apart.

Also, since when has CNN been doing positive pieces on issurectionary anarchists? They're only okay with them so long as they're bought and paid for liberals.

Not really. Why would this not be the case all of a sudden? The system, which is designed to favor rural votes, got Trump elected. How is it now less democratic than it used to be?


That's my whole point. The radical left is more-or-less bought and paid for by liberals. Once the radical left has served its desired purpose, it will return to irrelevancy or be eliminated.

Look at how quickly the liberal establishment acted to remove radical rightists from the Internet, for example. In the leftist analysis, fascists are not a threat to the class power of these corporations. Why did they move so quickly to weaken them? Shouldn't they treat Communists with a great deal more urgency, since, in theory, they actually do threaten the class power of the elite? Yet, money from the liberal elite still manages to find its way to the radical left.

So what are you suggesting? Is the "radical right" the new revolutionary tendency?

America was always racist, and fascist. Look it up, the founding fathers were assholes, who were only deterred by anglos in being bigger asses. Why any of you are surprised is beyond me.

I don't know. The radical Right has its own network of foundations and financial backers. The liberal establishment tends to be financially backed by Wall Street and Silicon Valley, and usually has a lot of influence in universities and over the judiciary. The conservative establishment basically is centered around the Pentagon. In case you didn't notice, Trump basically constructed a war cabinet. There are SO many generals. There is also the Zionist establishment, which does what is best for the Jews and Israel, as the Jews always do - though Jewish Power is also important in the liberal establishment.

I would say that it's possible for the radical right to be the new revolutionary tendency (in the sense that they are relatively weaker in power, but may become dominant over the next few years, riding a reaction to immigration and globalization more generally). But there could be something more insidious afoot. You can never really know.

Fascism wasn't a thing until the 20th century. You cant just throw around the term willy nilly.

Fucking dumbass.

Time to wear the scarlet F.

Boy ah say boy…

Who writes like this, my god?

Authoritarianism, and absolute monarchy, oligarchy, or any form of elitism is arguably worse than fascism, fascism is just based on race. The rest are not but are arguably more harsh. Do not think the founding fathers of Amerikkka were not authoritarian, racist, and outright evil, they majority of pro people decisions they ever made were because of a few deterrents, before that they would have been outright worse than the Brits.

An anarchist


Everyone was racist back in the day. Anti-racism is a pretty recent phenomenon. Fascism is also not strictly based on race.

Authoritarianism umbrellas all of those. Fascism is right. Totalitarianism is left.
They had no excuse for their beliefs, fuck them, and Amerikkka, frankly we should erase the entire west's culture, it's sheer ignorance.

Okay I'm sorry for being angry I just have a lot on my mind right now. FUCK.

Why don't you just move to a non-Western country?

Whoa there son, I'm spiteful, not insane.

I think the term you're looking for is "our guy"

I like Dr. Bones’ writing even though he is pretty fucking spooked for an alleged egoist

...

Dang, his voice is a whole lot higher pitched than I imagined it would be. I always thought he had this deep gravely sound to him.

this objectively looks like shit

perhaps

Also, wasn't this the guy who went on a hysterical moralist rant about some other Egoist publishing his translation of Stirner through an outlet that published white nationalist literature?

Yes, it's the same bloke.

*tips fedora*

Nope. Pure spectacle.

America is about to implode. it's up to us to pick up the pieces.

that first image reminds me of the ratman drawings in portal

wew