Is cultural marxism destroying the west or is just another pol boogeyman?

Is cultural marxism destroying the west or is just another pol boogeyman?

Other urls found in this thread:

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism
youtube.com/watch?v=iig-N_Kimlw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

define "cultural marxism"

whatever pol definition is.

usually muh gender shit, SJW, modern shit art, BLM, and identity politics I think.

No, the cultural fun and the erosion of the community were actually the things that the "cultural Marxists" were mainly opposing with their theories. It's just another Holla Forums boogeyman from a bunch of dipshits who don't read before they decide that they're against something.

thats cultural capitalism

...

Cultural marxists wanted to save western culture from all the things Holla Forums hates, not destroy it

It's just another Holla Forums boogeyman.

You have to be pretty fucking in the dark to believe an atonal music guru and a Jewish mystic-turned-Marxist literary critic destroyed western culture by critiquing art and pop culture.

then who are the ones to blame for the things pol blame on cultural marxism?

Unironically capitalism.

explain

rationalwiki.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism


In fact mainstream liberal LGBTQ community and most of feminists are not communists, sadly because if they were we wouldn't have problem.

I'm not particularly sure what it is you're talking about specifically since cultural marxism seems to be some kind of thought terminating phrase they blurt out when faced with something they can't explain the causes of, but most of the times they blurt it out it has something to do with culture and entertainment increasingly becoming watered down and pandering to the lowest common denominator.

retarded conservatives who think liberals are leftists.

If you're talking about progressivism. Yes it's erasing culture, but the previous culture is like dead skin, it needs to be shed, so stop whining and accept it. If not then no because cultural marxism is regular marxism but with a tiny pinch of progressivism sprinkled in that Holla Forums over exaggerates.

Humans need something to believe in or we destroy ourselves. When the west dropped Christianity we adopted socialism, nationalism, Not Socialism, anarchism, communism sort of and a lot of other beliefs. Faith that we are right is destroying us with infighting, if everybody believed more or less the same thing then this wouldn't be an issue, though I do think we need some outsider to unite us, every ideology has this, no matter what it is we need to find some ayyys to fight
"Cultural marxism" is more like the social aspects of marxism combined with post modernist deconstruction of everything with a lot of globalism thrown in.
Basically they swap the class struggle for idpol, claim there is no objective definition for anything and take advantage of the resources and hard work of peoples and nations outside of the west.
"Cultural marxism" is a reaction to people without belief trying to find something worth fighting for when everything is subjective, including morality. The only solution is for everyone to believe the same thing or near enough to it as it doesn't matter.

"Cultural marxism" is snarl word used in conspiracy theory that cultural freedom is in fact fun used by Jews to destroy traditional Christian family and then forcibly build Bolshevik Communism.

It don't have any real connection to actual marxist criticism of culture.

Aliens are just as human as the rest of us, fuck off.

so what is happening IRL?

And the most auto-ironic in this theory is view that Herbert Marcuse supported lusty gay sex and hideous transvestitism to destroy Christianity, when in fact he wanted to save real, authentic spirit of Christianity identified by him with freudian Eros, and perceived LGBTQ-movement as completly not dangerous for capitalism and warned the left against going too far in this direction.

This

but it happened at the beginning of the last century
Now its rich cunts many of whom are jews, but not all building as much for themselves as they can while increasing their ability to control everyone else. Hive cities are planned out my friend and its fucking horrible.

What's happening alread is moral panic and, by the way, nothing is more destrictive to traditional family than capitalism itself.

Bullshit, who you think they control and how? It's capital having people, not people having capital.

Thats the globalism, its inevitable with a system that puts profit before everything else.

Everyone but in different ways.
People want money, people with money want more money. Its a power trip. Money doesn't corrupt people, it helps people indulge themselves.

Capitalism destroys culture by replacing it with commodities.

Also in fact something called "traditional family" is in modern capitalist system perceived as greatest sanctity and literally nothing is possible to reform it. Feminism and LGBTQ movement lost completly and only losing it's every war, things are getting worse and in nearest 50-80 yesrs it'll not change.

This. Also:

Adorno was a social conservative who hated hippies, protest music, and was even attacked by feminists during his last public appearance. He died of a heart attack brought on by the stress of dealing with student protesters.

Benjamin was a literal religious nut who followed the same fucking kabbalistic system as those genocidal Chabad Zionists.

Fromm said pre-capitalist social relationships were superior to the relationships that exist in capitalism.

Etc.

It looks like conspiracy theory of capitalism.
It's capital that controls the people, not people controlling capital. Capital is social process and type of interhuman relation. It's not as simple that somewhere are living "Jewish / bourgeois / reptilian / whatever elite" and holds all strings.

I didn't say that. Replace the current 1% with any other people from any backgrounds and you get the same thing. The corruption doesn't stem from money turning people into monsters, we always were monsters. Without money we'd still be monsters, the way in which we do it would be different. Money is simply the way in which we show what we truly are. Read Jung

Jung a shit, he has all of the negative aspects as Freud (i.e. a tendency towards kabalism/essentialism), except without any of the insight. Freud's problem was being obsessed with sex, Jung's problem was not understanding why Freud's theories worked in practice.

It has destroyed nothing of substance so far. Weak willed institutions or social bindings and the motivators for the lower ranks of the social and sexual hierarchy have been hampered with the most. The ghosts of the soviet union propaganda efforts in the west were passed on thru education and capitalistic entities that use it for profit or competitor sabotage (see the outrage industry). But it was not just them, racial division is a booming business, and you can bet whether a country's currency rises or falls thru social strife. Education, Porn, and Video Games were targeted as primers for indoctrination, but the agenda is 100% globalist and the communist bow is a means to an end. This is why the millennial generation seems a bit retarded and likes to advocate the doing away with free speech lest it offend their sweet marxist sensibilities. Without free speech, you are not truly free. You see a lot of lost far indoctrinated with a 'fish mouth' expression, as they search for the right thing to say or do in a situation or conversation that does not land them in hot water or expose two conflicting beliefs they came to be both for at the same time. Radicalism isn't for the mentally weak, it is for the immorally strong who seek power. Fish mouthing lower ranks are ruining any chance of being useful in the technological age we are in right now, they are in fact doing the opposite, which is why the next gen of young guns are going to advocate capital punishment for those subverting the will of the people. I say this as a center lefty, id pol has seen to it that there will never be a left leaning president in our lifetimes again. The internet never forgets.

...

The issue with believing that all people have a dark side to themselves is that you understand that capitalism isn't the problem. Nobody is a victim of money, people might be victims of other people but the money didn't do this, people did. Its the same thing with blaming drugs on the drug dealers, if people had the strength of will/common sense to not do them then it wouldn't be an issue. Human weakness comes from denying part of yourself, accept it and be stronger for it.

no but if it doesn't the actual left should.

What the fuck are you talking about? If anything this is the problem with psychology and psychiatry more generally,

Even if you buy into the idea that all humans have a mystical, inescapable "dark side" that still doesn't explain anything about the structure of society. The way that social relations relate to production in capitalist society does have a significant effect on how people act towards each other regardless of any "fundamental" nature that you think humanity possesses.
Also, Jung was a really shitty psychoanalyst; there's a reason why his theories never got as big as Freud's. They didn't actually work.

Relevant video:

youtube.com/watch?v=iig-N_Kimlw

...

Ha, what do you want to do to the fascists? Attempting to morally justify something violent says you have the capacity for it and just need a reason for it.
Denial of our capacity for great acts of horror is the very basis society, we drop that when we need to such as in world war one and world war two. Most people in the current age would never think they were capable of killing that many people, but only because we haven't been tested. What do you think PTSD is? Its the realisation that you are a monster and everything saying otherwise was a curtain hiding it.

Read Lacan you idealist retard.

You're not actually responding to what I'm saying. Read very carefully and try to understand what I'm saying before responding, OK? Thanks friend.
I don't want to violently attack fascists, that's retarded. You can't destroy ideas by hurting everyone who buys into those ideas, that's dumb as fuck. I'm pretty sure that most on Holla Forums would agree with me here.
Everyone has the capacity to be violent, that doesn't really support your argument that violence is something that has an effect on every area of human behavior.
How does claiming that social structure shapes human behavior deny that humanity has the capacity for great acts of horror? They're not mutually exclusive claims.
Lmao, this is such idealist bullshit. WEWWWWW

...

...

war is embedded in the nature of chimpanzees. look it up.

Sure, but what does that have to do with what I'm talking about? We're not fucking apes, we're divided subjects with an unconscious, structured by a symbolic order.

That picture is pure concentrate spook.

Lmao, almost nobody of note accepts the killer ape theory in modern anthropology.

and that's why it's a cucked field of study

That's not an argument, user. Anthropology isn't cucked just because they disagree with you, they're cucked because of the insularity inherent to modern academic spaces. But that doesn't make them wrong when they say that you dumb theory is bullshit user.

user, even if this phantasmagoria that the right calls "cultural Marxism" existed, it would be far too late. Western culture has already been destroyed, and capitalism is to blame. Like the now-topical cuckoo, it has replaced someone's else's eggs with its own, and the hapless parents slave away to blindly feed and protect something that caused them nothing but harm.

...

I actually like it when Holla Forums and Holla Forums can talk honestly without insults and throwing cuck around. The reality that most Holla Forumsacks fear and know deep down in their mind is that they are very close to us - they despise liberal capitalism because it destroys society from within and reduces man to a commodity. I had a Holla Forumsack just the other day admit that the only difference between him and a communist is that he thinks communism can only work in an all-white community.

Do they all believe that the Jews things? I think some are just so deep in ironic meming that they don't know anymore.

Right? Talking to Holla Forumsacks has been one of the biggest ways I've been able to develop my thoughts on things. Even despite the constant raids and constant trolling I'd say that Holla Forums is as good as it is in large part due to it's adjacency to Holla Forums. I've seen many leftist communities turn on each other because they don't have a sense of what people outside their insular groups think. When all you get is leftist rhetoric minor ideological differences seem a lot bigger than they actually are.
It depends on who you ask, but generally they do. The idea is that every culture is reflective of biological factors and that Jews have a vile, degenerate culture which is responsible for many social ills in our society. The logical endpoint to this is eugenics programs, and when those inevitably fail to eliminate Jews they turn to more violent means to eliminate them.