Is cultural Marxisim a spook?

Is cultural Marxisim a spook?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtubedoubler.com/?video1=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnYqvp4gUqQ&start1=165&video2=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2rwxs1gH9w&start2=0&authorName=
twitter.com/AnonBabble

no

Woagh

peak wokeness

No, it's just made-up bullshit.

So, a spook then.

A "spook" is an abstract idea with which you mistakenly identify your self-interest. Just because you have characteristics which make you "white" does not mean that what is good for the "white race" or your "white country" is necessarily good for you. Similarly, just because you are a worker does not mean that what is good for the whole of the "working class" as determined by a "socialist state" is in your interest. Nazi Germany was hell for the white people living in it when considering the quality of life for the individual persons in it instead of some abstract notion of a "white collective", and so much the same for the workers of the USSR.

Confirming that traps are the Deleuzoguattarian in-between.

Cultural Marxism doesn't exist.

Rightwing nitwits mistakenly think that fighting "cultural Marxism" is in their self-interest. Doesn't that still qualify?

oui

It's a stupid conspiracy theory because conservatives can't comprehend that the majority of those who are genuinely well-read are leftists. Anti-intellectualism isn't just tankie bullshit, it's fascist bullshit too.

What was the SU's cultural program if not deeply and thoroughly ideologically Marxist? Further, do you deny the Active Measures program, or merely its extent?

If the SU and other Marxist states were simply heretical degenerations of Marxism that underwent capitalist subversion (revision) from within, as many of you claim, surely you then must admit it's at least possible for such degraded forms to become subtly (for intensity of fervor, and it was very widespread, combined with fear of persecution) entrenched in the West, via key pillars of the state ideological apparatus?

It's cute that you see yourselves as the generation finally free from the subliminal corrupting influences of liberal revisionism and opportunism, but believable?

Most of cultural marxism could be called cultural capitalism

the biggest spook of all spooks

Yeah, well, Marxism IS just Capitalism. Just a highly coercive and aggressively invasive species of it, paperclipped to a specious Enlightenment ideology, with little more than a thin veneer of circular, pseudo-Hegelian rhetoric to suggest it could ever be otherwise. Its economic architectonic, wherein the key antagonisms are to be located, even ignoring the woefully inane anthropology and cosmology that underlies this, is logically broken right at the foundations: Labor, Value and thus Surplus Extraction and the rest.

Anyone who claims to be a Marxist today is either a subversive charlatan (such as notorious Cultural Marxist: Zizek), state propagandist (CCP), or indoctrinated fool (Holla Forums).

stringing a bunch of concepts together in a row doesn't make you look any smarter you know

what the actually fuck are you talking about

yes

Marxist states invariably were nothing but Capitalist, imperialist, collaborated with international finance, destroyed organic socialism everywhere, and now are the worst kind of Fascism in the Marxist sense, many times worse than your nightmare vision of the 1930's, e.g. Russia with the seamless merger of the old repressive apparatus and ex-Nomenklatura international Mafia bourgeoisie, aligned with Zionism, and possessing a vast nuclear arsenal. Even after 70 years of absolutist re-education from cradle to the grave of your foundational texts and repression up to waves of violent purges of anyone who disagreed. Western Marxists seamlessly transformed into Progressivists - a Capitalist political theology that serves the ruling class.

I spent years associating with Marxists of all stripes, and not a single one of you are capable of thinking for yourselves, at all. You are only capable of regurgitating slogans and reading off a script passed to you by your authority figures. That's why it's so easy to deconstruct your narratives with simple suggestive wordplay like "Cultural Marxism", which is as accurate as any other label. To accept it you'd have to accept a significant faction of the ideological apparatus at the epicentre of the Dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie was actively distributing your "theory" to the masses unimpeded for a century. Cognitive dissonance, plain and simple.

Yes, OP. A spook, it is.

This is why nazbols belong on Holla Forums.

...

So what you are saying is that Marxists, instead of thinking for themselves and locating the contradictions of capitalism, historically and contemporary, followed by trying to find good solutions for these contradictions, decide to follow the words of old theorists and revolutionaries like a bunch of ignorant sheep who think they have found the truth?

THEN WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU CALLING IT MARXISM?

Spooky.

youtubedoubler.com/?video1=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnYqvp4gUqQ&start1=165&video2=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2rwxs1gH9w&start2=0&authorName=

"cultural Marxism" is product of Nazi propaganda

BTW Funfact: Herbert Marcuse actually had wrote that mainstream liberal LGBT and Queer movement is politicaly harmless to capitalism. It's only right wingers that made him "pope" of LGBTQ movement, mainly basing on their fantasies and fears, or repressed desires.

Could you post sauce? I'm sure it will be useful.

get the fuck out

its not real but it should be

Read the posts again. Marxism as a whole is a complete sham. It's Capitalist as fuck. Marx actually salivated over Capitalism, despite picking holes in it. It has nothing to do with what its zealots claim it to be or project into it.


yeah no

Also New Left is supposed to be your enemy too you useless fruit.

Mostly, yes. I'm talking rank and file. Vast majority. Certainly you have a small handful of thoughtful commentators still around, capable of using their own mind, just as there are Catholic monks who are worth reading too. Very very few and none post here.

Wanting to abolish capitalism is capitalism. Seriously though, what did reactionary movements ever do to abolish capitalism? We can argue about the inefficiencies of soviet socialism all day Mr. Nazleftcom Gang, but do not fucking tell me that fascists came closer to abolishing it.
Just because he viewed that capitalism gave humanity a chance to achieve communism doesn't mean that he supports it. But please, do enlighten me about how he wanted capitalism to stay.

Seriously, I feel like the bait is getting more and more horrible every day. I don't think I can keep this up comrades.