Is this porky propaganda? How the fuck do we defeat physicially fit classcucked chads? I'm skinnyfat and tepid

lol

...

see

basic stuff lads

just take a small loan of million dollars amirite

...

Wage slave who earns lots of money is still a wage slave not a bourgeoisie, and even then, blaming individuals will never defeat the system anyway. What is your point?

seize the weights

are you saying that we're gonna need .50 cals to take down chad?

makes sense tbh
those with little with bulk up to take it and those with something will do it to defend what they've got

Begin lifting yourself, you tankie

Why would you believe retarded bullshit like this

You can read the paper:
ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(16)30390-7/fulltext

lmao great survey

so? muscles don't mean shit for fighting

the what? give me some ammo for rebuking this shit i hear all the time

Majority of wealth is inherited and people who succeeded from nothing are huge outliers, with chance being a bigger contributor to their success than muh merits, as many tend to concede.

Although the hypocrisy of some leftists when it comes to the first world - third world wealth is a good point. (I guess you meant that)

what is your point? we hate rich Jewish people too.

back to pol antisemitic retard

back to Holla Forums, falseflagging retard

Do you plan on achieving your socialist government by punching people?

Not surprising. This certainly wasn't always the case, but the ongoing flirt of contemporary communism with post-modernism and identity politics has left an imprint that can be found even in anti-IdPol places like Holla Forums where charlatans like Lacan are still revered. Absolutely cancerous vulgar individualism like Stirnerism is just the icing on the cake, where you can basically justify being a mentally ill obese retard because hurrdurr spooks.

This, besides the fact that the image of the proletarian as a manual laborer has shifted to an office/service worker, is widely responsible to the - correct - analysis of the study that the absolute minimum of human attractiveness has been negated by the left in an attempt to relativize everything. There is no need for damage control. While a few commies who lift exist, self-improvement as a culture has been completely appropriated by the right - the left needs to realize that self-improvement is something that is inhibited by capitalism, not its operating value system. Too many communists see universally applicable values such as a discipline, health, attractiveness, determination etc. as artificially implanted by capitalism. Just look at the amount of embarrassing "anti-work" threads here.

Engage in self-improvement. Engage in self-criticism.

You got rekt porky.

youtube.com/watch?v=-_kwXNVCaxY

See:

this

the means of production will never be seized by these clowns

Of course, middle-class subhuman shitters who make an identity out of their pseudo-communist liberalism will be the first ones to go up the wall.

Why is it the same fucking person every time

So, is idpol going up the wall?

How? Half of leftypol is like that mods included

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_culture

Physical culture parades were all over the place in the 20th century, they aren't inherently lefty.

So lemmie get this straight

Chad = +4 strength
Communist = -2 strength + 4 mana

Is that what we're getting at here

They also said you're a closet Holla Forumsyp and I have no reason to doubt them.

...

Let's take the advice of someone who was isolated from the world for years. You and Ted have something in common, anyways.

Well it true isnt it?

The right wing are more individualistic, while the left can only feel power through community.

The left are the ones pushing fat pride, and trying to normalize being a fat piece of shit.

Im not saying all right wingers are in shape, but its the right that aspires to be a Nietzsche Ubermensch and also subscribes to traditional gender roles.

No. I'm a leftist because I feel it is the right to not be in a gladiatorial battle to survive, especially given today's circumstances. This is coming from someone in university, my major, psychology.

Which doesn't matter but the point I'm trying to make is "loser" is such a subjective term, and what isn't and is a loser to Ted's mind are so warped I don't think he understands what he's talking about.

His critique on technology in capitalism is biting, but he falls along tangents in others.

Liberals, not the left. There is nothing entirely leftist about identity politics, indeed, the right seems hyperfocused on it just as much as any liberal. They see themselves as "losers", in this same vain as well.

Ted was isolated. And he was right in some aspects, and completely non sequitur in others, failing to see the bigger picture Capitalism creates technological reliance on consumer product.

you have absolutely no proper knowledge of politics whatsoever and your primitive pseudo-sociological theories are based on your defective intuition fueled by lack of education

I suppose he saw it, but his model of what a leftist is, is confusing it with liberalism. There's nothing more to leftism than the collective goal of the people to be free from property and capital, and the one thing I do agree with him on is this falls within the same trappings of reliance on technology.

However, I feel reliance on technology in Capitalism would be far different than reliance on it in say, a commune.

I don't think Ted, aside from this, had a working knowledge of what the left was other than surface observation.

...

Nietzsche reading comprehension level: 0

This post infuriates the skinnyfat leftypol collectivist

"fat pride" is so unsubstantial that it can hardly even be called political, let alone left-wing
Also, it is clear you need to read Nietzsche or stop talking like you have

Lift yourself. There is no excuse for the left to look like .

you do not defeat them. That's the point. Communism by definition is an ideology for betas and cucks. In other words, communism is an ideology for losers which assures and eternal state of failure