Is there any amount of capitalism in a society you view as acceptable, or are you 100% communist?

Is there any amount of capitalism in a society you view as acceptable, or are you 100% communist?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=k79wCaFgU40&feature=youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Hegelians
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_economy
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Capitalism is a totality. You can't have a bit of capitalism in a communist society.

The question is rather pointless. The goal, the ideal, is pure communism.

What does "amount" of capitalism even mean? There are different stages of capitalism. Capitalism is acceptable depending on social and technological development of society.

In a purely communist society, there will still be some capitalism of course, just like we have slavery as a black market or punishment.

The way I see it is capitalism is 100% free market and private ownership, and communism is 100% everybody works towards the common good and there is no money. Basically every country on Earth is somewhere in between communism and capitalism, it's just a matter of how far on the spectrum they are. Most leftists I know claim they want socialism whereas it's mostly on the communist side of things but still capitalist for things like entertainment and products you don't need to survive. I just want somebody who's a total communist to explain their views or if they want any capitalism sprinkled in at all.

That's not how we see it, famalam. Capitalism and communism are two completely different and incompatible systems. You can't have a bit of one and a bit of the other. So long as commodity production and classes exist, we don't have communism

then you need to start reading books and laboring to realize the reality of things.

youtube.com/watch?v=k79wCaFgU40&feature=youtu.be

This is a good resume. Also keep in mind the laws that protect the workers, children and everyone laborer happened thanks to socialist economic theory. The Young Hegelians did a great job.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Hegelians

Lurk more

Social democracy when it was working was not bad and it was still capitalism.

However it has collapsed even in Europe apart from those faggy Scandinavian countries where it has become something else.

...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_economy

FTFY

You are confused as to the nature of capitalism. The fount from which all of the complexities of the capitalist system springs is the commodity (something which is produced to be sold). The capitalist mode of production then entails a system of production where the production of commodities is generalized, and with it the generalization of wage labour. There is a sliding scale but it is between commodity production and production for use, and that isn't a sliding scale between communism and capitalism. Primitive man lived entirely by production for use, while the feudal world and the early manufacture period (proto-capitalism) mostly had production for use by the producer or as tax in kind (agriculture) but where the surplus was then brought to market as commodities. Abolishing commodity production in part in a highly technological society would almost certainly mean a regression to small scale producers of the early proto-capitalist. What communists seek to achieve instead is a complete implementation of production for use in the context of a highly technological society, while avoiding the regression of part-way abolishment.

Communists want to end private property and the market, yes, but it is all a part of the greater goal of ending commodity production in favour of production for use.

Still 100% capitalism, famalam. Socialism =/= gubburmint and regulations

Mixed Economy is Scandinavia pretty much. But that only means state & corporate capitalism.
The only thing Mixed Economies borrow from socialism are basically laws to protect workers, so corporations can't own them as slaves but as semi-slaves.
I do prefer Mixed Economy Capitalism than Pure Capitalism for sure, but yea. Thats Capitalism.

Here are the types of economical organization that are not hierarchical look into them in wikipedia: individualist (self autonomy), mutualist, syndicalist, collectivist/socialist, communist

In every other economical orders you're fucking someone up someway. By exploiting his labor or by selling him shit (trading unfairly with the odds against him/her).

Ignoring what others have pointed out, I can readily speak for myself - I'm not any percent communist. I'm a Georgist.

Only when it's Apple or Starbucks.
Bourgeoisie funding for left wing rallies is also acceptable.

...

...

"waaa everyone who isn't socially retarded like me is a hipster!!!!"
what a bitch

No, capitalism must go. And no, markets aren't synonymous with capitalism.

...

Yes

hahahaha I'm not mad at all man wtf. I know Holla Forums is retarded but jeez.

100% communist

jesus fucking christ how retarded are you. you should actually be ashamed of your stupidity and shoot yourself in the head

I don't even consider this a coherent statement.

Maybe you should ask the person who codified he fucking idea of capitalism as we know it what it means.

I want state owned roads, rivers, lanes, property, schools, factories, etc etc necessities and commons.
I am okay with small private businesses, like hairdressers or restaurants and cafes, who are regulated to provide good service.

But then again, I do want a state, unlike pure communists.

Obviously we need a mix of both.

10% Cuck
20% Shill
15% Usin the power of the state to kill
5% Investment
50% Gain
100% It's the fucking poor to blame

capitalism is better than feudalism

...

🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧OP🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧