Lol, basically all you've said here is that Zionism, just like Nazism or what we may call a specific "Italian fascism", are all different subsets of the same fascistic political tendency, which is exactly as I described it above.
Nah, I'd rather not reread something that is literally inspired by the anti-materialist and political determinist Gramsci but from the right and, speaking of our old pal Gramsci, we'll be mentioning him again later in cameo again.
I'd also like to, since you like to pile everything on da joos again, not just ask you make a more informed guess on the irrelevance of kibbutzim over time but, also, to explain the little peril national "sociaIism" had with our friends Gregor and Otto in the kitchen, thank you very much. Ayo halt, we war Übermenschen n Scheiss, es war da Joos again! Am I right?
Angelo Tasca, Rise of Italian Fascism. From the empirical-statistical angle, there's always the freely accessible data the Italian State has maintained in archives, from the very first modern Italian state post-mercantile mode starting in the mid-19th century until now, complete with bookkeeping and spending records. You're welcome.
Don't forget our cameo-man Gramsci, also imprisoned. To get to your question: fascists, as much as they are a representation of capital's reactionary tendency, are also mere sensuous individuals, with their own notions of then how to safeguard capital best. We must remember that fascism in Italy required the repression of dissidents, but in whatever form best suited the mainstay of their rule. They found that perhaps incinerating them or putting them to slave labour would delegitimize the "divine justice" or "fascism's essentiality of man", and thus merely imprisoned them; those poor souls who dared to resist the feels.
Tell me exactly how the communist movement expressed itself until the things you most associate with its horrors (Stalinism, likely your no. 1, etc.) and, just like fascism, tell me its roots; where it came from, how it came to power, and so on. I recommend Zizek's take here: fascism is first horror then tragedy, communism first tragedy then horror; fascism meant bad guys saying they would do bad things and then doing bad things, communism meant good guys saying they would do good things and then doing bad things.
But more than that, I'd like you to tell me on what payroll (if any), on what principles, on what basis, et cetera the texts and speeches by communists (Marx, Engels, Lenin) versus fascists (Mussolini, Hitler, Franco) were based. I'm all ears.
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01.htm
I'm a communist and never did I not favour anarchists: youtu.be/feepQg_Dx7U?t=12m14s (timestamped for ya).