Ancap Meme Dump

t. piss-baby user throwing a temper tantrum

not pictured: the wojak remotely piloting the drone.

"Channel 9 news tonight: A woman was stabbed to death after spending three months rent on one bitcoin."

How young and poor are you?

tbf rights are liberal horseshit and don't exist

hello stirnir

he's right though. Negative liberty doesn't exist.

absolutely bourgeois

reported

Boycott businesses you disagree with. Problem solved. That's what happens when you choose between different private owners of businesses. You cannot opt to 'leave' in a Communist system: it is forced upon the people. Kind of a reason why there has never been, and never will be, a global worker's revolution.

Oh, is that because, historically, nations with Marxist ideas have had very low GDP per capitas? So, he has no money to give…

When in capitalist Rome…

user, I…

If you care so much about GDP then you should also support open borders for white/western countries. Just saying.

Keep on attacking the strawman you want me to be.

What are you smoking? If you don't like the communist society, more often than not they'll encourage you to leave rather than deal with your bullshit

good morning my porcine acquaintance

How exactly will I "leave"? What a free society, if I disagree with the ideas, they kick me out. I guess that's why the Berlin wall was erected, to keep all the people who wanted to leave… inside.

Yeah, because every single person decide things based on logical and well thought motives all the time, and, for some reason, a single person's voice can fairly compete with the multimillion dollar media that the company doing the fuckery is clearly associated with

Boycott: withdraw from commercial or social relations with (a country, organization, or person) as a punishment or protest.
The definition only targets the entity that is BEING boycotted and does not speak on behalf of the entity doing the boycotting. In reality and historically, it has always been many people.
All it takes is a shift in public opinion. Emphasis on PUBLIC, as in the people as a WHOLE.

How exactly can I leave capitalistic society? If I disagree, I die of either hunger or a bullet. whatever comes first.

Reread, go back to English class, then come back when you have attained some reading comprehension and actually wants to have a discussion.

Trily7, the pinnacle of power and influence.

Truly*. Fucking cellphone

If you 'disagree' with effort to maintain your livelihood, then you die. You are not guaranteed any such sustenance or existence from anybody, so if you decide to do nothing or minimal effort and expect to live a standard life, you are in for a rude awakening. This is not mutually exclusive with capitalism, even in the primitive 'communist' societies of the past.
Where are the capitalist death squads again? Who is doing the shooting? Capital punishment isn't the law of the land in many areas, and you must first be found guilty before a court of law. Nobody is just going to 'kill you'.
You can leave a capitalist society by going to live in the forest in some far-off area. But you'll still have to work to provide for yourself. Except you will be self-employed and able to keep everything you hunt. Wait… I wonder if self-employment exists in capitalism…

This isn't your normal hypocrisy, this is… advanced hypocrisy.
Complaining about how you dislike the usage of the term doesn't actually dismiss the usage as illegitimate or incorrect.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis
Honestly, this level of ignorance relies on a complete dismissal of any historical events. Refusal to trade and "I don't want to trade/buy" is the most powerful phrase used in any market.

wew

Then they have no right to kick me out of anything. So I can open up my small business and sell my goods freely, without fear of state oppression or violent destruction because people dislike businesses and free trade. Glad we agree.

the same way Holla Forums has managed to successfully boycott certain publishers, right? You do realize companies can just hide their dirty secrets, externalize them, or straight up spread advertisements everywhere in order to attract further customers.

...

Well, how many people have signed a pledge to refuse to cooperate with the publishers? Depends, if it's just a couple hundred people half-assing something, then no.
If the dirty secrets are illegal, then no, they can't. If it is involving insider trading, then no, they can't. If it's a health code violation if they sell foodstuff, then no, they can't. Usually, the reputation is damaged in a free and open setting. So, when the Montgomery bus boycott occurred, it was precisely because it was in an open setting. Remind me again, what was the result? When public opinion changed suddenly?
Of course, MacDonalds abusing animals and whatnot is open news to everyone, which is why they put out a huge PR campaign and changed their farming practices to avoid breaking the law. Now it is 'less worse', so to speak. Not illegal, but people don't care enough to boycott them. When you have products as good as they do, people don't care. Also, millions of people don't pledge to boycott them: just the opposite.
Ads like Pepsi's ads won't work if they double-down after a PR disaster.

If there is no oppressive state acting as a limiting factor, or any coercive force, then I am free to trade as I please. Who is stopping me? The 'People's police'? Just don't call it a state!

Wew

no one is going to boycott shit just because you find it reprehensible. The oil lobby, among other things are morally reprehensible to many people, yet are a necessity to keep this world trade afloat. Would such a company be boycotted, or perhaps there are more factors that go on, both on an individual, and societal basis, than personal moral stances?
It doesn't for the vast majority of people you condescending shit head. This is the most pathetic meme you clowns spout, as though people can pull money out their ass. Capitalism exists, and reproduces itself for a reason; there's a divide between those who have property and capital, and those who don't. It's that divide that keeps the locomotive of capital churning. Unless of course you're willing to accept this, at which point we have virtually nothing to argue about because you actively promote a contradictory world view.

so corruption is allowed to exist in your system because a quantitative amount of people do not meet the criteria to remove it, got it. Let me keep that in mind when I call the cheka on you so no dissidents are left, then I'm operating in good faith.
This IS what happens in reality, and yes they can and do all the time, because they have the wealth to afford to do this. This is how class dynamics work.

Wage slave? Oh, woe is me, all those six-figure earners are "slaves", working for 'da big man who be keepin' us down'.
Dying of hunger is more of an issue with homeostasis, not with 'capitalism'. Refusal to harvest resources to feed yourself means death, and this isn't unique to capitalism.
You deserve to die if you don't want to live, just as the people who refused to hunt or do anything were kicked out of the tribe deserved to die.
Again, boycotts aren't individual efforts, they are groups. You have already convinced them. The million dollar PR stunt means nothing if the group refuses to listen. That's why places like Whole Foods are thriving.

That's because there is a global demand for energy. That doesn't mean alternatives don't exist; in fact, it is precisely because people dislike the oil companies that alternatives are being invested in.
I have to remind you of the definition again: withdraw from commercial or social relations with (a country, organization, or person) as a punishment or protest.
If the demand limits this group protest, then there will be no such boycott. The solution is to start a new business targeting the dissatisfied consumer base. Which plays into the Whole Foods point above.
Because it is illogical to assume everybody can run a business: most fail because individuals are not equal in their faculties. Simply because many cannot play basketball at the NBA level does not mean the NBA doesn't exist or is inconsequential to the market (take a look at small business earnings in the US). What a shit argument.
Oh, it's the old "rich people are a static group and if I have money, I can start a successful business" canard again. youtube.com/watch?v=Qi8clPrg7kc
That's because people aren't equal.

It depends, if it is a smaller business, then all it takes is the town to refuse to buy goods and they must change or lose their customer base. What 'corruption' are you talking about? Insider trading is illegal. Madoff and the like get jail time, they don't keep on committing crimes.
[citation needed]
No such 'worker's revolution' has ever occurred successfully, all your examples lasted for a few months or were destroyed by their own internal inconsistencies/by the superior systems.
Happens all the time? Please cite me a few examples. Because I'm sure all the illegal activities were reported to the authorities.

Bolshevism and fascism are superior systems, you heard it hear first, folks

Fascism was defeated BY the Americans. Mussolini has been dead. Not Socialism was also defeated. No such 'fascist' system exists. You're thinking of your other buzzword, 'imperialism'. THEY were the ones who were superior by your own self-admission, as they brought down the 'worker's paradise'. That, and all the internal inconsistencies, what with the fake 'surplus value' meme that presupposes workers exist in isolation and that profit exists to pay for all their claims, or that contracts for employment are non-existent/the terms disappear at the worker's convenience.

If the demand limits this group protest, then there will be no such boycott. The solution is to start a new business targeting the dissatisfied consumer base. Which plays into the Whole Foods point above.
I have to remind you I really don't give a shit about your definition of a boycott, I care about whether or not you willingly accept corruption or not.
pairing apples and oranges, what a surprise! The NBA has no bearing on my existence other than as a distraction, an individuals capacity to have the prerequisite capital available in order to become part of the leisure class does.
on the contrary they can, do you have some proof of this business gene certain people have?
it's the old money can't make more money argument.
oh shit.
therefore they deserve to slave away for the rest of their lives. Can you give conclusive universal proof that all people put in the position of lower social class are inferior to those in a higher class? It's almost like there's more to do with civilization than just genetics, but that would cause your brain to explode.
Yet the vast majority of other banks get away with it to this day, and got free corporate welfare to boot. Madoff was small time, a few billion is pocket change to wallstreet.

I guess Rome fell apart due to the superior system of management of the barbarians lol.
BP oil spill
massive pharmaceutical waste dumped into drinking water supplies.
pollution of Native land in Canada
etc
etc
etc

If a man with a gun has claimed all the only well for 30 miles, and you are dying of thirst, is he doing anything wrong if he makes you suck his dick before you can have any water?

Holy shit I finally see now that a system that came into existence 3-400 hundred years ago actually equals, equaled and always will equal human existence. I mean it's just as unchangable as the fact that we have to bash in is mammuts' heads with wooden clubs for 14 hours every fucking day so we will be able to eat that tasty raw meat in our caves. Thank you for enlightening me.

Looks like ancaps don't want to admit to being cocksuckers.

They didn't even hit the jew…

Maturity is know who deserves your energy.

hahahahha somebody fucking has mommy issues

typical capitalists, they can only think in the context of whatever's happening at the exact moment they're living and breathing.

...

contributing

...

ancapism is a mental disorder

good! fuck those faggots who tried to game me out of my pokemon cards when I was younger.

so what's Communism then? it's not a gift economy like everyone on this board says?

communism is free market, without any states and bosses taking from you what you produce.

...

sounds like mututalism

...

That makes me laugh every time I see it.

...

the black scientologists have it right! L. Ron Hubbard was a BLACK MAN!

stay woke

I give up on American's. This type of hysteria is only known to your land.

hello jewish nazi puppet
oh, you didn't know? nazism is a kike's ideology.

...

...

...

Just to let you know, this guy isn't Jewish.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi

Wait did he say there’ll be a commie town. I could see how that goes down.

BadMouse made a video on this.

though tbqh praxeology was a legit topic of research before libretardians appropiated it.

'just boycott the food producers'
youtube.com/watch?v=6Tz5daRrGDw

also you broke the NAP by not giving meme tribute while arguing

its from a comedy tv show
youtube.com/watch?v=yet2Q0M32GQ

youtube.com/watch?v=1zNrHa08BS8

youtu.be/eSMOwjsBX1s

I'm no leftists however.

Nice one.

Praxeology is basically

Its a joke, you can equally start with every other system instead of capitalism and do the same praxeology-like methodology.
I like to call these market fanatics teabagger, basic result of market propaganda you see them everywhere ancaps, liberterians, republicans, Tea Party.
———–

I have a question how much do you make? Is it enough to be featured in Forbes?
And what is your profession?
Because I have a theory you are some minimum wage toilet cleaner in real life.
Or work for McDonalds or some other minimum wage company.

And this leftists is why leftism is wrong.
Retarded morons like teabaggers will exists they are generically inferior and will actively believe propaganda and will refuse to believe in reality.
If you can not convince teabaggers and they are minimum wage working class how do you hope to create your workers paradise?
You need to understand that if people ever established a government where everyone was payed the same and everyone would be happy there would be always retards and idiots like this local teabagger here.

You need to accept this, and simply have a policy on not only throwing teabaggers out buy actively shit on them and even exploiting them.
Teabaggers love to be exploited and will demand removing safety regulations and pay them less because if a idiotic toilet cleaner is gets less money he thinks that somehow be a genius super elite rich capitalist.

There is no global worker community that will sing kumbaya together, if everyone knows teabaggers exist (or do you have a alternative theory on who teabaggers are?).

So what is your theory on how teabaggers originate?
Genetic retardation?
Chemical brain damage?
Propaganda pre-seeding?
Something else???

I like to have the answer to these questions.

lmao at this trigerred fucking piss-baby

Do you have any understanding of free-market economic theory whatsoever? Read some Adam Smith.

...

Oh look its a teabagger.
I did, the question is did you?

Do you even know what this man wrote?
Adam Smith was a idiot, everything he wrote can be questioned with inserting statements like:
Not substantiated!
How is this derived?
Not sound!

For example the man seriously believed that human psychology is static.
He did not believed that multi town or multi national businesses can form because:
Today we can prove him wrong with facts about transnational corporations.
Reality has disproved his baseless sophistry.

All of his extrapolations about some invisible hand are wrong, provably so by the fact that its baseless idiocy on basic human organization.
———–
(I'm getting side tracked)

I also like to point out what a joke economics is, it took 200 years for economists to even start using the basic facts and observations even a illiterate present can deduce.
If economics has started and was for 200 years inferior to the intuitions of a illiterate present its a massive joke.
I'm talking about asymmetry of information.
What level of delusional, reality designate and retarded do you need to be not to realize that a shopkeeper can drop his food on the ground and simply lie about it and the customers have no idea about it?
Until the 1990s economists did not accept this fact.
Then suddenly they accepted asymmetry of information and somehow bade a breakthrough that every village idiot in the mileages knew.
Wow 200 years for economics to even begin to progress to the level of knowledge of a illiterate present.
The whole discipline of economics belongs in the trash with astrology.

This fact is demonstrable and repeatable with experiments, economists can go and jerk themselves off with their meaningless ass pulled numbers somewhere else.

If the russian allegations turn out to be true, and russia supports assad will the faggot of a BO be pro-trump or will they turn anti-syrian? Serious question.

Yeah, no. Maybe you're thinking of Keynes who's polluted modern economics with illogical fallacies, or Marx who was just a designated retard. Smith was groundbreaking in a number of ways, he clearly defined things which had never been defined before, things that seem obvious in hindsight, such as the benefits of free trade -'It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family, never to attempt to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy…What is prudence in the conduct of every private family, can scarce be folly in that of a great kingdom.', or how the invisible hand of the free market works to create mutual benefit for people looking after their own self-interest - "It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest". Are you complaining that he wasn't an omniscient being whose theories were perfect in every way when he was a pioneer in his field? Do you "muh information asymmetry" debunks Wealth of Nations? Go back to /r/neoliberal.

ok, here's a question. In ancap everything is private property right? Whatever's currently owned by the government would presumably be sold off to private owners. Then all these things get traded in the market.

This means every piece of private property is surrounded by other private property. Why wouldn't I just buy up all the properties surrounding someone's house and charge him a million dollars to cross my property?

lmao
I think lolberts are those teenagers who watch deathnote and have their minds blown.

not an argument

wasn't supposed to be one you piss baby, I'm making fun of you. Now fuck off.

You're not doing a good job of it. Seems like you're just having a tantrum.

He pioneered the Labour Theory of Value, strong unions, and heavy taxes because he knew unchecked capitalism would be dictatorial. Fuck off.

k

You are not answering

You post is insane you state blindly things to be fact.
Did he have the theory of asymmetry of information?
YES/NO ?

If he did not then he was a babbling retard.
Also asymmetry of information. Is something testable, demonstrable and real.
In like I can create a double blind experiment and prove it in reality.
Every time.
So this is something true VS your mysticism that asserts things out of nowhere.

Also asymmetry of information is something every child can understand, its basic if he did not include it he was mentally retarded.
200 years for economists to acknowledge something a child in every age can tell you.
Its on the same level like starting your physics and not mentioning gravity and after 200 years of telling the UN-educated plebs that gravity is a myth and "educate yourself" acknowledge that the plebs where right and you discovered something every village idiot was telling you from the start.

Demonstrate the existence of this invisible hand or shut up.
It fiction more ridicules then ghosts.
Adam Smith was a babbling retard every single of his babbling can be countered with a simple
The man belongs in the trash right next to astrology.

No.
If you don't make the observation that:
You are retarded, functionally retarded.
Even village idiots before him and after him functioned on this understanding of reality.
It took economists 200 years to even grasp such simple concepts.
How about Adam Smith the mystic will write one fact and less mysticism about invisible ghost hands.

His work belongs in the trash.

Ask a economists how information asymmetry destroys classical economics.

Wealth of Nations is a book full of incoherent babbling and ass pulled conclusions.
On this alone its to be thrown out.
Then you have the fact classical economics requires perfect markets and perfect information and information asymmetry makes this assumption unrealistic in reality.

However AS makes statements that are literally wrong in reality today, therefore his theories = wrong!

Like how hard is it for you economic mystics to get that if ghosts don't exist in reality they are made up fiction. If your theories contradict reality you are wrong and reality is right.

No, it's because the ancap cannot live without assigning a price tag to everything, but money is no use to a communist, so the communist jokingly gives the ancap a worthless monetary value as payment to fuck off, showing how little he cares about ancaps and their capitalistic ideology.

If you earn six figures, guess what?

You're in the top 10 of Americans%.

That's 90% of people whose lives are in absolute hell trying to survive. Sure, there are those who make between 30,001 and 99,999 a year, which is a bit easier to survive on, but that's just 40%.

That leaves 50% of Americans living on less than what it takes to support one person. And many of them have families they're trying to take care of (myself included).

And that's just Americans. Life tends to go even further downhill in many other countries. Capitalist imperialism has fucked up the world so hard that it's now considered a blessing to get to work 80 hours a week for less than $600 with zero benefits and no job security (before taxes, which should be paid by the corporations - but they don't, so guess who the government takes it out of? The only people too weak to say no: the poor).

telesurtv.net/english/news/Colombia-Coca-Cola-Accused-of-Funding-Terrorist-Paramilitaries-20160901-0005.html
cia.gov/index.html

you idiots get trolled too easily. Post more ancap memes

...