We need global neoliberalism to get rid of borders and nationalism before we can have a successful international revolt

We need global neoliberalism to get rid of borders and nationalism before we can have a successful international revolt.

Other urls found in this thread:

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1877/11/russia.htm
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1881/zasulich/reply.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

^ forgot your flag

It's almost like Marx was 100% right about capitalism setting up the material conditions for communism to be established, and that only a global revolution will work without being subverted

I wonder who's behind this post

Kind of pathetic almost everyone on Holla Forums hasn't read Marx.

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§Karl MarxπŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

In the sense that it's inevitable? Probably.
In the sense that we should encourage it and push for neoliberals? No.

the material conditions under capitalism that could produce socialist revolution is not a global capitalist government that keeps the workers complacent with gibs.

Fuck that. Socialism in one country is the way to go. Also a global neoliberal government would have an easer time putting down worker moments. We gotta keep the bourgeois divided.

for once I agree with a NazBol

Things only (You) have said in the thread.

socialism in one country is the only good socialism. just as the vanguard guides the people of the nation, the national bolshevik nation must stay national and act as a global vanguard. nazbol GANG

We were all born in a time that's just a lead up to an international communist society, that of which will probably never happen since Capitalism not only establishes the material realities for it to be realized but also simultaneously kills us all in the process.

Accurate.

Just the like the monopolization of companies can be viewed as the blossoming of the economic relations that will come from socialism, we could also view neoliberalism as the blossoming of geopolitical relations that will come from internationalism.

Thank you for the advice armchair-man

Why accompany this post with a picture of Marx of all people? Marx was the first to say that you can have a communist movement and a successful complete abolition of capital starting from the agrarian revolution. He didn't even think capitalism, or the total generalization of commodity production, was necessary to have communism. Read, nigga, read:
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1877/11/russia.htm
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1881/zasulich/reply.htm

The more capitalism develops as a mode of production, the harder it fucking gets. We are today faced with the confluence of labour: no longer can workers as clearly recognize their predicament when they very rarely work in factory units where the division of labour and the clear process of their labour as alienation is visible. Today, workers only deep under the skin still personified labour, which makes organization for workers a completely different question that requires an entirely different answer. When you see workers today rebel but (seemingly) very erratically, with almost no clear strategy to take, that's a symtpom of the fact that shit like the unionization are not just dead tools, but have become conservative elements the more time passes. The further we thus develop capitalism and merely accelerate, the more we lose ground. Accelerationism, therefore, of the "right" or "left" variety, is thus merely truly whether it realizes it or not just of the left or right wing of capital's variety. We are communists, not vulgar materialists and maximalists and thus not accelerationists either.

Found a quote in the German Ideology you may find useful.
It is evident that big industry does not reach the same level of development in all districts of a country. This does not, however, retard the class movement of the proletariat, because the proletarians created by big industry assume leadership of this movement and carry the whole mass along with them, and because the workers excluded from big industry are placed by it in a still worse situation than the workers in big industry itself. The countries in which big industry is developed act in a similar manner upon the more or less non-industrial countries, insofar as the latter are swept by universal commerce into the universal competitive struggle.

Marx didn't invent leftism you nigger

Indeed it is true. The problem is that neoliberalism's way of doing it may produce extremely bad intermediate consequences.

You could argue that Hitler's victory would also lead to communism - but would it be optimal and shortest road by any means?

Fuck off, the only true aspiration should be a europe united under a red flag. The rest is usless waste of time.

...

Good luck with your abandoned museum.

Another good catch, yes. Those two letters I linked where he says the same are more elaborate than that part, but it's great that he already concluded this so early. German Ideology is to be completely ignored as a merciful blow to end the corpse of German idealism/neo-Hegelianism but rather to be used as one of the best outlinings of Marx at his most fundamental.


Shush.

This. Dont fall for Trotskyist spooks

...

Dubious. If anything neoliberalism's cancerous "Take the bottom 40% of the first world income distribution and tell them to eat shit" approach just inflames nationalism further.

Consider for example how well integrated mainland Europe could have been under some sort of continued social-democratic regime without British and American interference. Consider the developmental effects that a balanced trade regime would have had on Africa and so on. Upwards economic harmonisation would make the slow erosion of borders and intellectual solidarity of the working class much less painless.

Err, much more painless.
Ironic mistake as I'm currently in pain.

Are you American? Only they're delusional enough to think europeans don't hate each other despite all of them being white.