Why do conservatives preach about morality when they dont have any?

Why do conservatives preach about morality when they dont have any?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/GdpmO
jewishgeneticdiseases.org/?p=60
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunger_in_the_United_States
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition
youtube.com/watch?v=RddqP0ABzwM
youtube.com/watch?v=yddMuQhaDbw
youtube.com/watch?v=PSYJBVvyP08
imgur.com/a/725A7
holocausthandbooks.com
motlc.wiesenthal.com/site/pp.asp?c=gvKVLcMVIuG&b=394667
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

dude muh 7 kids per nigerian mother lmao

Fascism dies the day they admit their lack of a moral compass. As soon as the Fascists admit this, we probably have stricken the most fatal blow.

A fascists moral compass is completely utilitarian. If you point out that Hitler got money from US cooperations and invented privatization, they are answering "yeah but that was the most effective at that time". Under the umbrella term of "corporatism for the good of the nation" you can justify almost every retarded shit.

Except killing Jews isn't utilitarian at all.

...

if it were "utilitarian" it would fucking work

Oh, they have plenty of moral virtues. It's just that morality does not actually make people do things that benefit people.

So they are organized virtue signalers? Just as I always suspected.

Utilitarianism is completely broken. It tries to measure qualitative actions quantitatively.

...

cuckservatism in a nut shell

How else are they going to sit on their high horse and whine about people all day?

"conservatives" are retarded but so is this "argument"

...

...

He's right, you know

Whatever you say, Americlap. Go melt some cheese.

All the statist cults are based on exploitation, with the same crooked occultists lording it over everyone else. The political spectrum is full of nothing but puppet ideologies, and always has been. We are all under stealth feudalism.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

hi Holla Forums

how is this Holla Forums, if anything it's probably some nerd from /x/

Where the fuck have I see that dude?

Nothing wrong with letting shitskins die and killing degenerates

Fine, but there's also nothing wrong with letting NEETs die and killing porkies.

Why do liberals preach about morality when they dont have any?

FACT: you can't be a moral person unless you are 100% down with communism.

A fetus isn't alive.

this but unironically

"The basic feature of our economic theory is that we have no theory at all."

I wanna strangle this guy.

Shark Tank

what exactly is the endgame of an African woman having 7 children of which she can not feed a single one ?

what is more immoral, making 7 kinds and kill them, or not to care for other peoples insanity?

Nothing is more shocking than what goes on in Africa. The problem is liberals can't accept a change in ethical standards is more important than stealing from conservatives and splitting the money with Africans.

It's not up to them.

A show on CNBC where morons hoping to "make it big" prostitute themselves to the round table of capitalists for table scraps, so they can then go, and exploit others for their own financial gain.

That meme is a bad argument, fam, when Christians are the primary group of people going out of their way to help the starving in Africa. Lefties like to highlight their struggles but hardly ever do anything about it.

Also you can be against faggotry and starvation, this isn't an A or B choice.

You feed starving Africans.
They breed.
The amount of starving people increases, hence feeding them is immoral.
You make the problem worse by helping them.

archive.is/GdpmO

The Nazis weren't even opposed to marxism for the policies, they were just afraid that it was Jew science.

depends on the men, dunnit

To elaborate, we should be sending them birth control, or at the very least making sterilization (but not necessarily permanent sterilization) a prerequisite to receiving aid.
They are massively overpopulated and feeding them so they can continue to breed at an exponential rate is complete insanity.
Short term good feels is not worth long term pain.

fuck off, racist

It's got nothing to do with race.
If Europe was as big a mess as Africa I'd have the same opinion.

Africa is all black, you just are projecting your xenophobia.

Conservative "morality" isn't about making anything better.

It's a combination of tribal affiliation and the lionization of certain virtues or actions as the ultimate test of morality (originally, these were based on ascetic virtues, but as the right has become more decadent with the coming of consumer capitalism, the qualifiers for morality have become increasingly arbitrary)

...

Rwanda already has a sterilization program and Paul Kagame admires Singapore and Lee Kwan Yew. However I'm pretty sure he is just using the sterilization program as a way to get away with finishing off the Hutus without people getting up in arms about it.

"The chief advantage that would result from the establishment of Socialism is, undoubtedly, the fact that Socialism would relieve us from that sordid necessity of living for others which, in the present condition of things, presses so hardly upon almost everybody. In fact, scarcely anyone at all escapes.

Now and then, in the course of the century, a great man of science, like Darwin; a great poet, like Keats; a fine critical spirit, like M. Renan; a supreme artist, like Flaubert, has been able to isolate himself, to keep himself out of reach of the clamorous claims of others, to stand ‘under the shelter of the wall,’ as Plato puts it, and so to realise the perfection of what was in him, to his own incomparable gain, and to the incomparable and lasting gain of the whole world. These, however, are exceptions. The majority of people spoil their lives by an unhealthy and exaggerated altruism – are forced, indeed, so to spoil them. They find themselves surrounded by hideous poverty, by hideous ugliness, by hideous starvation. It is inevitable that they should be strongly moved by all this. The emotions of man are stirred more quickly than man’s intelligence; and, as I pointed out some time ago in an article on the function of criticism, it is much more easy to have sympathy with suffering than it is to have sympathy with thought. Accordingly, with admirable, though misdirected intentions, they very seriously and very sentimentally set themselves to the task of remedying the evils that they see. But their remedies do not cure the disease: they merely prolong it. Indeed, their remedies are part of the disease.

They try to solve the problem of poverty, for instance, by keeping the poor alive; or, in the case of a very advanced school, by amusing the poor.

But this is not a solution: it is an aggravation of the difficulty. The proper aim is to try and reconstruct society on such a basis that poverty will be impossible. And the altruistic virtues have really prevented the carrying out of this aim. Just as the worst slave-owners were those who were kind to their slaves, and so prevented the horror of the system being realised by those who suffered from it, and understood by those who contemplated it, so, in the present state of things in England, the people who do most harm are the people who try to do most good; and at last we have had the spectacle of men who have really studied the problem and know the life – educated men who live in the East End – coming forward and imploring the community to restrain its altruistic impulses of charity, benevolence, and the like. They do so on the ground that such charity degrades and demoralises. They are perfectly right. Charity creates a multitude of sins.

There is also this to be said. It is immoral to use private property in order to alleviate the horrible evils that result from the institution of private property. It is both immoral and unfair."
t. Oscar Wilde

Also,

"The virtues of the poor may be readily admitted, and are much to be regretted. We are often told that the poor are grateful for charity. Some of them are, no doubt, but the best amongst the poor are never grateful. They are ungrateful, discontented, disobedient, and rebellious. They are quite right to be so. Charity they feel to be a ridiculously inadequate mode of partial restitution, or a sentimental dole, usually accompanied by some impertinent attempt on the part of the sentimentalist to tyrannise over their private lives. Why should they be grateful for the crumbs that fall from the rich man’s table? They should be seated at the board, and are beginning to know it. As for being discontented, a man who would not be discontented with such surroundings and such a low mode of life would be a perfect brute. Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man’s original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion. Sometimes the poor are praised for being thrifty. But to recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less. For a town or country labourer to practise thrift would be absolutely immoral. Man should not be ready to show that he can live like a badly-fed animal. He should decline to live like that, and should either steal or go on the rates, which is considered by many to be a form of stealing. As for begging, it is safer to beg than to take, but it is finer to take than to beg. No: a poor man who is ungrateful, unthrifty, discontented, and rebellious, is probably a real personality, and has much in him. He is at any rate a healthy protest. As for the virtuous poor, one can pity them, of course, but one cannot possibly admire them. They have made private terms with the enemy, and sold their birthright for very bad pottage. They must also be extraordinarily stupid. I can quite understand a man accepting laws that protect private property, and admit of its accumulation, as long as he himself is able under those conditions to realise some form of beautiful and intellectual life. But it is almost incredible to me how a man whose life is marred and made hideous by such laws can possibly acquiesce in their continuance."
t. also Oscar Wilde

And Holla Forumsacks say African women are uggos.

What? Black women are ugly, Holla Forums is right about that. I guess they have to be right about something.

Children are not useless in pre-industrial societies the way they are in post-industrial societies. They can be used as a source of income and, more importantly, provide care to parents in subsequent decades.

That is how the extended family structure works. Think of it as a pyramid scheme in which the top tiers, as members die, are constantly being replaced by the next tier down. The more children a person in a pre-industrial society has, the better off he will be.

Yeah, that's nice and all, but I was talking about their morals, not their politics. I'm aware that charity is an inadequate solution, but a partial solution is still better than none.


Virgin detected.

It isn't a solution at all.

In many a case, it's part of the disease.

Pic on the left:
The destruction of the circle of life, men craving other men but unable to create babies.

Pic on the right:
Please give food to foreign children while accepting the left picture as high gospel.

A jew would never understand this, though.
They are not human. They have the most genetic diseases. They are aliens trying to fit in.

...

Seriously. I explained it in the most simple terms and you did not get it.

But that's the good thing about jews.
You can tell them their flaws straigh in the face, like their eternal gloating.
You could tell them right before some event that would reveal them as jewish or golemized if they acted a certain jewish way.

And they'd still do it.
jewishgeneticdiseases.org/?p=60

Aliens. Pod people.

What is the acceptance of the act on the left in the society on the right?

Wew there lad.

I think Americans are fairly accepting of homosexuality these days.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunger_in_the_United_States

How does it feel to never going to be accepted by western minds, ever?
Are you posting from a different dimension where they are pushing gay acceptance the least on whites while also pushing aid to whites and encouraging them to have as many children as possible?

It is impossible for my brain to come up with any simpler explanation and save the jewish parasite from getting euthanized en masse, for the first time in history due to the global network of people on the internet all having become wise of them, in our lifetimes.

It boggles the mind, but then again, this does involve non humans.

fuck off crypto-Holla Forumsyp.

No, that's a constructed reality of neo-fascist hysteria and outrage politics.

In reality, liberal idpol champions "LGBTQ POC" all the time, and the same libs that don't give a shit about white poverty don't really give a shit about black poverty either. "Starving children in Africa" is just the new "starving children in China", i.e. - a platitude to chastise anyone in the West who dares question their conditions (and children who won't eat their vegetables).

Because it's easier to preach about spreading something you don't have. That's why the right talks about spreading good morals and God's love, and the left talks about spreading wealth and power.

"Spreading" wasn't quite what web had in mind.

False Dichotomy.


I agree. That guy was clearly not a Holla Forumslyp.

Mods should unban him tbh.

Looks like the blacked meme

...

Pffft. How uncivilised.

That revolutionary bastard son of a black gun isn't even considering the non aggression principle.

I bet you have shit taste

Demographic transition. In a pre-industrialized society, death rates are high due to lack of access to adequate food and medicine, especially for infants and children. In the early 1800's something like 40% of all children born didn't make it to age 5. To compensate for this, women have high numbers of children so at least a few survive to adulthood. However, once food supplies become steady and medicine is available, the death rate drops, and it takes some time for birth rates to drop, due to old habits and the lack of birth control/family planning. This results in a massive population boom. This happened in the west in the 20th century, and it is happening in Africa right now. Death rates have fallen in Africa, with the exception of a few areas, but it will take time for birth rates to fall. That's why it's important to get birth control introduced to Africa ASAP, so that their population doesn't skyrocket out of control.

The starving children are not Americans but your response is what I have come to expect of this board.

Retards have never heard of the Demographic Transition, or even considered that parents might have more children in order to beat the odds of child mortality.
Your best bet to stop 'blacks' over-running 'white' nations is to improve their standards of living at home so that they have no reason to leave.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition


Which is why they didn't do it, and why there is no evidence of it, as it would have been a terrible waste of fuel to dispose of a million bodies by cremation at Auschwitz where the ground was too low by a river to dig mass graves, or that they wouldn't have had time to burn a million bodies as claimed in a timeframe after Zyklon B deliveries had already stopped because their life-saving fumigation clothes delousing facility was made obsolete by a new microwave delousing chamber, or that it would have been a terrible waste of prison labor.
youtube.com/watch?v=RddqP0ABzwM
youtube.com/watch?v=yddMuQhaDbw
youtube.com/watch?v=PSYJBVvyP08

ok

imgur.com/a/725A7

to appeal to those who won't and hope they might actually read
holocausthandbooks.com

I don't actually expect you to accept it now fam, it'll take months before you actually settle down enough and become curious, watch & read, and get through the pain of realising you were duped for years.

motlc.wiesenthal.com/site/pp.asp?c=gvKVLcMVIuG&b=394667

What happened in Chile in late 1800s?

Define life.

Why do you want to kill people so badly?

...

No idea. If I had to guess, such a sudden drop in death rates is likely an anomalous data point, or perhaps a year with no proper data on death rates.

Lol we have a moral understanding of the world but your too retarded to understand it. Maybe, just maybe, someone can have a differing ontological perspective than you and they aren't evil sub humans. I hope that we can all live in peace and you can respect my different understanding of the universe and nature. I hope that's to much to ask of you. Also the guys on the left are qts.

kek gonna love showing liberals VR videos of africans mass starving and tell them "this is your fault" after the crash and/or revolution