What's the difference between Lauren Southern and Anita Sarkeesian?

What's the difference between Lauren Southern and Anita Sarkeesian?
They rant about the same stupid identity shit, claim to be harassed even at times when they're clearly not, and they're hyperfocused on the spectacle.

Other urls found in this thread:

anti-dialectics.co.uk/Outline_of_errors_Hegel_committed_01.htm#Hegels_Clangers_
everydayfeminism.com/2015/09/trans-partner-lesbian-identity/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Anita appeals to aging hipsters while Lauren goes for thirsty right-wing teenagers and 20-somethings.

its a trick question there is no different

They're particularists so they literally believe the same logic applies different to them. You could replace a neo-nazi rant about jews with "cishet white men" and it looks like an SJW rant, do the same with an SJW rant, turn "cishet white men" into "jews" and you get a neo-nazi rant.

To these people left-right politics isn't about universalism vs particularism, but two brands of particularism.

Nothing. They're both midly attractive women with a large following of thirsty white knights. It really just a brand thing like he/she said.>>1859915

I want to fuck Lauren Southern.

I doubt they even actually believe half the shit they say, as is the case with most internet pundits they found an exploitable market and stuck to it. Sargon doesn't even pretend to have a coherent ideology while Laci Green pulled a 180 when she realised the money was on the other side of the fence. Thinking about the spectacle can be depressing.

...

Antia is two steps away from being woke

...

Neither are attractive.

she's an airheaded e-celeb retard but her observation is accurate. no western, liberalism-indoctrinated news editor would allow black infants to front an article of that nature; they would be well aware of how that would appear. and a nation's population decline is not stemmed by importing people from other nations. it's like saying the african rhino's population decline can be be solved by importing asian rhinos. it's just ideological liberal nonsense

Lauren is hot, Anita is not.

Cancer

And you could replace jew with capitalist and it would mirror what leftists think. Fucking news flash you self congratulating morons "they both believe things and dislike other things but opposite aren't they exactly the same???" Isn't a fucking insight.

Nobody sprays anita with urine when she goes to public demonstrations. Because she tows the party line and has the full support of world jewry to gradually remove white males out of video games.

Anita also wouldn't wouldn't jump into the middle of a radical right right rally. If she did, I can't say the same wouldn't happen. And if it did, the right would ask why the fuck she was there in the first place.

She didn't even know if it was piss. Just like she assumes every goth kid is antifa.

The only difference is Lauren Southern's got blonde hair. Anita Sarkeesian ain't exactly hideous to look at either, trust me.

Well, I'll be…the mods approved of my early release. I ain't banned no more…

find me a video where she's said this once.

Anita is the protege of a literal scam artist.

Anita points out that dumb fanservice and wish fulfillment in media is dumb fanservice and wish fulfillment, but tries to make it political because it's dumb fanservice and wish fulfillment aimed at straight white males because she's a liberal idealist. She can be annoying, but at the end of the day she's just a female version of any number of channels that whine about irrelevant shit in media. She just gets attention because greasy shut-in nerds don't want girls in their special club.

Lauren Southern, on the other hand, talks about real politics and real political issues and pushes a far-right narrative on things that actually matter.

Anita is just an irritating provocateur. Lauren is a potentially dangerous ideologue. I don't think the two are really comparable.

Does anybody believe that Anita wasn't harassed? Sargon and Thunderf00t and their retarded audiences still go after her till this day and stalk the shit out of her.

All those people who irrationally hate her think she is just making shit up. It's like when Gamergate was happening and all those feminists got harassed: "Any TRUE gamergater wouldn't dox or harass people so you are either lying or being harassed by someone else."

Southern is honestly not super hot, i don't get the fascination

Anita appeals to idpoling SJWs while Lauren Souther appeals to Holla Forumsyps.

Honest to god, fuck them both. Though Southern more than Anita.

...

Right wing of capital.

Left wing of capital.

But class hatred is not necessary. You assume wrongly.

t. gay

t. taste formed by watching brazzers

Mass Criticism is actually harassement.

The problem wasn't really her as she's basically a liberal televangelist, but more about media who see her as a martyr and take what she say as gospel(and a convienient device to push that War on Women who was supposed to make Hillary wins).

Southern is just Ann Coulter 2.0.

(you)
take your meds

Very bad criticism is still not harassement.

Anita was mostly some etablishement media love story. Gamergay would have changed nothing either way, all entertainement would have gone full idpol anyway regardless of swarms of abuse elementals boogiemen. See comics, Ghostbusters, Nye,Magic the Gathering. Even EPSN gone full SJW.

It's not even against you leftists anyway. You had nothing to do with it.Etablishement just believed it was the ultimate weapon of pleb engagement until Trump because muh demographics.

Let's try!

Jeez, what's so bad about it? Silent Hill 3 was GOAT

Im pretty sure everyone has noticed the correlations between rad fems and evangelical Christians. The only difference being that one really hates men.
Feminism actually holds a lot of conservative views, like modesty, or wanting to separate men and women, or hating trannies.
The evangelicals wanted to ban porn, and censor or ban video games too.
The social justice people are the left equivalent of all those right wingers in the 80's, who were the "moral majority", trying to control everyone for their own good.
I mean historically if you actually read about the history of feminism they have done terrible things, the reason america had prohibition on beer was because of feminists.
Also a lot of of the so called founders of the modern feminist movement were racist.
The only reason the feminist movement started was because white women were butthurt that white men gave black men the right to vote before them.

What the feminist dont realize is that the system, capitalism, loves feminism, they love the idea of normalizing a minority, turning it into another cog in the machine, another consumer, another worker drone, more women ceos :DDD

Its machismo that is a threat to the system, because machismo is violence, and the system doesn't like violence, it likes the status quo, it likes happy, docile, emasculated, citizens.

As for white supremacy, it is identity politics you mong.

Wrong. Reproduction of capital is an impersonal process. It happens with or without capitalists.

I still have to meet this kind of feminist.

Anita's a straight up scammer instead of a mere metaphorical scammer.

< I want to fuck Anita

One's a fuckable Jew, the other's an unfuckable Jew.

Come on, Southern is at least a little bit fuckable

Ha! So predictable. Anita looks like she crawled out of a gutter and you know it.

It was just a standard joke fam. I'm not actually invested in Anita or her looks.

I know it was a joke, but still predictable. I'm not a fan of either to be honest but one must admit there is definitely a wide margin between the two in terms of beauty.

no difference

The difference is Anita is someone who uses critical theory for the sole purpose of making money off of it. Which is very common today among Neo-Marxists since the "communist" ideology today can be sold as a image. Lauren on the other hand legitimate believes her own political viewpoint while making money on the side.

TL;DR : One is a public figure propped up solely for profit, the other one isn't.

Anita has never presented herself or her theories as marxist, socialist, or communist. Critical theory is not marxist

Both of them are in it for profit, you moron.

Where is this from comrade?

Same. Right-wingers and sjws tell me they're everywhere but I have yet to see one.

I think they're all on /r/gendercritical

Antonio Gramsci and Gyorgy Lukacs who largely influenced Max Horkheimer, the same Max that laid the foundations of Critical Theory is not Marxist. K.

If you're influenced by people influenced by people influenced by marx you're basically a marxist. Which is why there are no marxists and only hegelians.

Christians: anti porn, want women to cover up, hate trannies

radfems: anti porn, want men to stop staring at them, hate trannies

lel

Nice strawman. No wonder everyone on this site laughs at Holla Forums.

How is it a strawman?
It's exactly what you are saying.
How does Marx have anything to do with it?

You're a retard.

Literally nothing wrong with this, sinner

I didn't misrepresent your argument I just exaggerated aspects of it for humor. The reason "I laugh at Holla Forums" is your only response is because your only consistent ideology is self-congratulating smugness.

This HAS to be bait.

He was being ironic lad. Read context before judging.

Unironically this. anti-dialectics.co.uk/Outline_of_errors_Hegel_committed_01.htm#Hegels_Clangers_

...

It's actually quite sad that a whole site had to be created to hammer in that Hegel is a retarded hack and that historical materialism can do well without dialectical materialism bullshit; but what can I do.

I think you need the gulag, friend.

So you are the creator then?

One is a puppet on porky's left hand, the other on his right one.

I wish I was.

topkek, filtered
>>>/tumblr/

Anti-porn and prostitution makes sense in an anticapitalist way. Chomsky is a radfem by your standards.
And I don't think they hate trannies, they just don't acknowledge their gender. I think they are not even opposed to transitioning. I recommend Magdalen Berns, she makes a lot of sense.

To add to this, read everydayfeminism.com/2015/09/trans-partner-lesbian-identity/ and tell me transgenderism isn't sexist and homophobic.

Anyone using Names+Flags should be banned.

Nah, it's true. Everything was alright when Japan made good games, before the PS3. I'm willing to trade pixel representations of white males for getting more weird cartoonish characters again.

What's the difference between David Duke 7 Anita Sarkeesian?

I would say "genitals" but that self-help sex book Duke wrote under the name "Dorothy Vanderbilt" makes me doubtful.