Turns out the centrist was a racist imperialist. Like clockwork

Turns out the centrist was a racist imperialist. Like clockwork.

twitter.com/joeprince___/status/884463860736028672

twitter.com/LevzOfGrass/status/884431511386296322

Other urls found in this thread:

web.archive.org/web/20160116035143/https://www.foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_DecWebClearedMeta/31-C1/DOC_0C05779612/C05779612.pdf
sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100121155220.htm
archive.is/SM7pK
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You consider stating facts racist?

Idpol libs on suicide watch!

hi falseflagging Holla Forumstard

B-but muh start-up country!

So much for the tolerant center.

tbh shitting 8 kids when you don't have enough food to feed yourself is retarded.

Africa does have a natality problem.

He's right though. A continent wide one child policy would help mightily with productivity and capital accumulation.

...

...

come now

when's the individual going to sack up and do something?

"Aid" nice euphemism for imperialism, bud.

I hate to defend the mini-bourbon, but where does he blame the individual in that transcript? It's two statements: one, Africa is in civilizational crisis. And it is - as is the rest of the planet. Two, the high amount of children per women is part of that. He neither blames women or Africans, but merely notes two truths about the conditions that rule there. Where is the blame?

Maybe if there were less people there would be more jobs and less starvation.
Ya ever notice how all the first world and successful countries have low birth rates

...

Ya ever notice that slack-jawed look you have plastered on your face all the time? Ever notice that you have a harder time at school than the rest of the kids?

A country has low birth rates because it's developed, not the other way around.

ya ever notice how in all graphs we study in school living standards improve before there's a lower birth rate

i dont follow

I agree that Africa's problems are civilizational. They'd probably have higher living conditions if there weren't dozens upon dozens of foreign interests taking the natural resources and exporting them elsewhere.

I don't know if you've noticed, fam, but most politicians don't talk straight

How on Earth do you expect it to affect the number of jobs.

but he didn't even mention skull shapes

Are you
that by merely raising the point he is already being a racist woman hater? Because I don't see moral language there, and I can't see where you read it.

...

Well yes, because a politician like Macron "merely raising the point" is tantamount to them stating it outright. Politicians are weasels, and any remotely uncomfortable statement they make will be hidden behind a million layers of bullshit

how are the neolibs gonna rationalize this?

As if they didn't agree. It's the white man's burden of ideology.

can't tell the difference between nigger logic and leftard logic at this point.

most don't talk straight to coddle the feefees of faggots like you.
And when they don't bother using novlang bullshit, you get Trump, wins, and mountains of salt.
in other words, disregarding your ass, or actually going out of your way to trigger the leftard is a good deal, because nobody likes lefties.

Do you believe everything the ruling class tells you?

I bet that's a totally new experience for you

Imagine my shock

The Eternal Faguette (faggot+baguette=French homosexual) strikes again. Seriously, French neo-colonialist rule of Africa *can't* be overshadowed by America when it comes to the topic of imperialism. They're up there with the burgers when it comes to destructive foreign policy and parasitic """trade""" relationships with developing countries.

He was set straight very quickly.

This explains everything.

...

...

Black people generally don't bother me because I'm not autistic.

I bet you are an anglo

Will liberals ever learn?

Le Pen can't win if Macon becomes Le Pen!

If you become your enemies, you win!

Maybe you need to kill yourself

it is not like population is the only changing variable here, productivity of labor changes too
unreproducible natural resources are the only real constraint on population growth

Maltusians of all stripes were bfo'd in the past century
faggots like yourself really need to read his Essay on the Principle of Population
no modern hypocritical political correctness there
ordinary brits are literally treated like cattle that uncontrollably breeds because they are stupid animals who only can act on instinct
Ricardo refused to donate to orphanage because he thought it would encourage uncontrolled breeding of plebs

Malthusians refused any form of welfare because they thought it would encourage uncontrolled breeding of lower classes

it's ironic cause social safety nets actually work well to reduce birth rates

the picture I never knew I needed.

Is that why Frog Kingdom went and killed all those Libyans?

Less children, more oil to sell to French Fries? The plan was so perfect! Where did it go wrong?

web.archive.org/web/20160116035143/https://www.foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_DecWebClearedMeta/31-C1/DOC_0C05779612/C05779612.pdf

This is 100% what would have happened if shillary had won. All the liberals would cheer about defeating drumpf and then she'd make a some super predator comment and they all act shocked as if no one would've seen it coming. Honestly the more neoliberals are elected the more I agree with Zizek's accelerationism. At least with trump the dude can't tie his shoes wrong without the entire country noticing.

what exactly did he say that was factually incorrect?

Normies can't handle the race realism.

And this was the centrist candidate during that election, lel.

NAZBOL GANG CONFIRMED

...

He's right though.

He's not wrong about Africans having too many children. They're breed like rabbits.

This place is filled with liberals, kek. Back to Reddit pls.

Race-realism is real racism tbqh
sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100121155220.htm

I get that you just discovered socialism for the memes 2 months ago but try not to be too spergy in the meantime, kid

Nazbols are borderline third worldists Holla Forums. Pick a different flag.

We need to purge Nazbols.

The Rwandan genocide is partially on her hands, so yeah

>>>/liberalpol/

t. college "socialist"

...

Repeat after me:
I am not idpol

Do you think children are self-sufficient?
I see your point though.


That doesn't really help much in case of subsistence farmers unless it's combined with modernization.

Thanks for confirming. Now fuck off

wew

You're the one who brought up racism, not me. You're such a stupid projecting faggot.

Well at least you're better than reddit.

Actually, it was OP.

Neither of us is OP, so bringing it up out of nowhere still makes you a raging faggot.

Politics aside, that's just unreasonable.

Not when you're using it as a comeback specifically to me

what did he mean by this?

soon this will be taught in every school in the world.

You said I was "defending imperialism" by not actively bitching about it.

That's some serious neolib "your silence is violence" shit right there

Lol what? No I didn't. Literally the first use of the word "defending" is in your post ITT. Stop projecting. I just said it was a leftist issue (it is) and you called it idpol (it's not).

Well when you call over half the board liberals what do you expect?

Africa would be better if only african women existed there

So much for the centrist center!

Just come out and say you hate black people, mate.

But only African women would be anyone

They chopped each other hands off. Whitey dindu nuffin

No you don't get it. Capitalist exploitation is fine as long as you get to virtue signal really hard that you CAN'T be a liberal because you don't care about black people.

thicc blacc babes is all we need in this world

White makes right.

and this is why your memes don't catch on.

That meme's been round since before I found Holla Forums. I only found it like 2 weeks ago myself, but thanks, Jimbo.

I'm sorry, but the numbers say otherwise.

...

...

Despite him saying this, how will it be possible to change this?

Oh wow, that's funny.


Oh. Look at that.

Oops!

Holy shit, what the fuck? He's a radical centrist or a right wing cunt? Le pen should have won

Shouldn't neo libs centrists be pro immigration, idpol, white guilt and shit? What the fuck is he doing? This sounds fishy

This is the third time I've seen that picture, but I still have no idea who that is on the left.

he's right tho

Quick rundown on the bog brothers:

Once there was rich, industrious and thriving civilization called Africa, then the white people came and took everything away. We know this is true because if you don't believe it then you're a racist and racism is wrong.

Fuck off Holla Forums

Why should I fuck of for telling the truth about how whites took all the civilizations away? You know it's true, you know Africans themselves are entirely blameless because all they had was taken away by whites, you're not a racist who goes to Holla Forums.

He's right though. African governments are notoriously inept and nearly all the able people there either exploit the situation for personal gain or get the fuck out as soon as possible.

wtf i love macron now!

archive.is/SM7pK

No one here is saying this
No one here is saying this.

I i'm not saying that africans are blameless, but macron in his speech ignored all the material conditions. Plus, I don't undestand this man. He should be a radical centrist. He's not centrist at all. He's going against everything that a radical centrist rappresents. He's a right wing neo lib

Bu-but Macron was a communist queer cuck backed by soros!

If you had to say out loud instead of simply blaming the whites with at most using a buzzword like neo-colonialism, you'd embarrass yourself. This is why I do it for you.


Given that "material conditions" effectively means "it's capitalism, I aint gotta explain shit" I can see why.


You don't understand France, it is simultaneously Europe's most politically correct, SJW country and one of its most reactionary.

they'll call it an evidence based assertion and defend it.

that's what centrism is in modern day lingo though.

Kekking at all the replies this got with the biggest shitpost image I've seen recently.

...

...

Wouldn't artificially decreasing the birth rate while maintaining the mortality rate (assuming they're not implementing measures to help with child rearing + conditions for healthy birth) just kill off the entire continent in one generation?

i need a quick run down, comrades

not retarded, bait

dreadful, isn't it
I guess the enlightened white man shall have to take up the burden of fostering africa's natural wealth
*record scratch*
*western poors digging in african mines*

Who's fucking stupid enough to claim being impoverished gives greater incentive to have large families? To anyone with a functioning brain, if you're poor, you have less kids. That's why in white countries in times of economic hardship birthrates go down, not up.

You say that like it's a bad thing. They add not one single positive in any aspect of life.

who the hell thinks macron is left?

...

We're not operating on gut feelings like you but on consistent stats/trends that have held true for the last couple centuries

I bet you're the kind of retard who harps on about "individualism" as if it means fuck all to you except "i'm too stupid to understand averages and trends"

Bro, do you even biology?

[CITATION NEEDED]
The most prevalent observation was that birth rates go up under economic hardship. We now know that Stress increases the release of oxytocin and other neurotransmisors which also play a role in romatic relationships and in general libido (that's why scary movies are great to bang girls).

I swear fucking race realists who get their sources via infographics are the most scientific illiterate fags spawned by the internet.

You act like this is an unchangeable natural law.

There's this magical thing called contraception


If they have access to medical treatment that makes their mortality go down this significantly then they have access to counterception.
The reason they won't use condoms is superstition and stupidity.

None of what you said here addressed the central point, which is that economic hardship → higher birthrates. You're just too retarded to understand trends, no one gives a fuck why each individual person had the number of kids they had you autistic tard

I didn't want to believe that the entire impetus for your and pol's autistic racial hatred was your inability to get laid but you make it extremely difficult to discount that theory.

So then, tell me if I'm missing something.

In his victory speech, he displayed the EU flag but not the French one, and wouldn't stop talking about muh globalized world. Suppoerted a monarchy. Talked bullshit about being a "Jupiterian" president". Said his ideas are 2deep4journalists (tho he's probably right). And now this.

Any other lowlights? I know he wants to increase the working week but he hasn't made any moves towards that yet.

...

The politically illiterate, which encompasses the vast majority of the Right

this


it is in all agricultural societies

I wish, instead all the focus is going to no nothing bullshit like the Russian investigation or some stupid twitter feud. The only policy the media's been focusing on, healthcare, has gotten maybe a 1/3 of the attention at most. My fault for watching 24/7 """news""" broadcasting

Nazbols are the worst posters on this board. Read some theory or history on colonialism before you post on here. Memes don't count

For an anti natalist board /leftycuck/ sure seems to love coming to the defense of Jajimbe and his 13 crotchlings in the slums and favelas of Lagos.

Never change!

No, the birthrates are related to the mortality rates. If a lot of people are dying, you need to have a lot of children to make up for it. If most children don't survive until adulthood, you need to have even more. And when you live a rural life where children actually help out with farming, having children is even more incentivised.
Now reduce the mortality rate and you get a huge population surge, which can continue for several decades since population growth has momentum. What you will get then is massive overpopulation that leads to more deaths and mass migration (what we have now), unless the population growth is coupled with industrialisation and improvements in agriculture (what our industrialised societies went through in the past). Eventually the birth rate will go down as the country industrialises and having flocks of children is discouraged
Basically, if Africa hadn't been buttfucked by imperialism, and if there had been investments in industry and agriculture (and protectionist trade policies in order to protect these industries from foreign competition), then the countries would have been far better off. But of course, that wouldn't have been in the interest of global Capitalism, and now that it is coming back to bite them, they are all trying to explain how actually it isn't their fault at all.
Again, read a book

the labour reforms are coming this year, I think around September from what I've read of the CGT agenda

How do you think that came to be. Both Macron and you are omitting the role the former European colonizers had and in France's case, continues to have in making it so that their former colonies are still organized to be around the interests of its supposedly former overlord, and not the development of their own country. Popular politicians across the continent were assassinated if they threatened French interests and dictatorships deliberately propped up as long they continued to support France