Looks like pol is worried about the declining birthrates

This is sho serious!

8ch.net/pol/res/10175051.html#10175111

Other urls found in this thread:

jacobitemag.com/2017/06/20/modernitys-fertility-problem/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertility_and_intelligence
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition
huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/04/richmond-california-anti-violence_n_7504554.html
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4265496/Georgia-couple-given-years-prison-hate-crime.html
reddit.com/r/videos/comments/32i99e/black_judge_gives_armed_robbers_a_light_sentence/
nytimes.com/2016/12/17/opinion/sunday/unequal-sentences-for-blacks-and-whites.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_world_syndrome
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nations_and_intelligence#Limitations_and_criticisms_of_the_IQ-data_collections
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Why don't they try and be their own person instead of some insufferable faggot obsessed with a muh legacy.

The spectacle gets in the way.

Feh. If they want people to breed like they used to again they have to make them afraid of God again or worsen their living standards.

So close and yet so far away but hey its the jews fault.

because their own person is not a very good person

Why not both? They aren't mutually exclusive, faggot.

I like how those young republicans are still pretending to be nazis.
Declining birthrates in the west aren't bad at all, the problem lies with the birth rate in developing countries still being too high. The solution is not for us to start breeding like rabbits, but ensuring proper economic development and secularism in poor countries.

Because when you're gone your achievements mean nothing.

That's where you're wrong kiddo. God judges everyone.

when you're gone you're gone. What does it matter if no one remembers you

We need higher birthrate because the niggers, curryniggers, and chinks are out-breeding us. Gotta take out all the shitskins in Europe too as well, increasing birthrate and removing the shitskins go hand in hand.

Why don't they try and define themselves seperately from their views on the economy and the government?

Because economy and the government actually have an impact in everyday life.
The decrepit bones of muh ancestors don't. The ghosts of the past won't get me a job nor make gas, groceries and rent more cheap so my life suck less.
You fucking retard.

...

It's because they're socially retarded. They're worried hard about the virginity of the girls they "try" to pick up since they're inepts at it.

Everyone has always known that Holla Forums is shares some shit in common with /r9k/ and so on. Vice versa. And with 4chan's /fit/ they only share the stupidness of their ideologies.
Holla Forums is a board of ideologies, the retarded have the dumbest ideologies.

Holla Forums on the contrary rejects ideology, usually. Some still live in la-la land through but the ones that read are down to earth.

Because birth-rates are possibly the single greatest indicator of how healthy or unhealthy a society is - the fact that birth-rates in most Western countries are below replacement should be a major cause of concern, but it is instead dismissed with a shrug because "Well if we don't have kids we can just import some Africans that will"

I mean I thought that for a board that blames everything wrong with the world on capitalism there'd at least be some sort of materialist analysis of this, instead of the usual "Looks like those racist virgins on Holla Forums did it again. What a bunch of racist virgins"

The real reason we don't talk about that is because those threads get swarmed by anti-natalist fucktards who then proceed to ruin everything.

Humans are a K-selected species, having few kids is normal under sufficiently supportive material conditions. This is why "capitalism = human nature" arguments are so retarded.

I thought we're letting in shitskins by the millions to remedy this though? Muh pensions and muh economy!

You do realise that if you're poor you are more likely to breed. If these countries were socialist, they wouldn't breed like rabbits.

Yeah, I didn't really want to comment in this thread because I know it will eventually devolve into anti-natalist shitposting and lame attempts to one-up Holla Forums strawmen with Africa's birth-rates

Yes but if the birth-rate is below replacement clearly it's not "normal". The Japanese response to its greying population hasn't seen the government cheerleading that this just means that the handful of babies born in Japan will have even more resources lavished on them

...

Birth rates have been dropping for around 200 years in most modern societies. It's not a bad thing.

leftypolists are such shallow creatures, there's more substance to even a gypsy than to these creatures of game theory

...

...

what is wrong with that ?
if a somewhat closed region (borders and restricted immigration like almost every country in this planet) has proven itself to be able to maintain and raise the level of technology and intellect, why shouldn't they try to maintain the population that made this happen in the first place before importing opportunists who would just leech off the benefits the society provides?

It is when most Western societies have birthrates below replacement, and the only thing keeping them up is a constant stream of immigration from non-Western nations - the only reason Japan is an outlier on this is because it isn't following the strategy of "we'll just outsource fertility to Third Worlders"

you fucking retard

you shouldn't look at birth-rates on a local scale, but on a global

and ona global scale, the homo sapiens is breeding too fucking fast

Or alternatively cut back on working hours giving muh middle and muh working class get the time to consider having a family, and so breeding like rabbits seems more like an economically more stable reality to the husband-wife working duo.

It may not be so much poor conditions, but too much time on their hands. But I'll have to look back at the numbers.

This
Seems like a lot of posters on leftypol haven't read any theory, like at all because they seem dumbfounded by any Holla Forumsyp that can put his pants on without poking his own eyeballs out.

You all should be able discuss subjects that attract reactionaries.

Birth rates are negatively correlated with almost everything desirable in a society. Its basically good when they go down, and the more parts of the world that undergo fertility transitions the better for all of us. That being said, once it happens birth rates are at below replacement and no one really knows how to get them back up. Its a unique problem in history honestly.

I hear you brother, I too have played a lot of RTS games.

most western countries are probably overpopulated to begin with (except the US which has a ton of empty space). Child rearing is expensive. It has no material benefit, as children aren't useful as farm workers like they might've been hundreds of years ago. People also have less time to take care of children, and many want to invest time into their careers. People blame atheism or welfare or whatever but I think South Korea is an obvious refutation - Christianity is popular, and it has little in the way of welfare for old people, hence the elder slums - but its birth rates are even lower than white Europeans'.

What's wrong with not wanting the population to increase endlessly? Earth can only support so many at any particular quality of life, and the more of us there are the shittier it's got to be.

tell that to every famous writer, war hero, and architect

Source?

what?

Why aren't you living a completely ascetic lifestyle, user?

Well they're sure as hell not doing anything about it. Holla Forums is the epitome of "I have never seen a vagina".

If you're so concerned then improve yourself and adapt so you can find at least one woman who won't find you repellant.

Some Holla Forumsyps are so close yet so far from becoming one of us.

Oh come on. Aside from a few Stirnerites, Holla Forums is choke full of ideology, which isn't necessarily bad.

kek

And what happens when even the handful of places left in the Third World with above-replacement birth-rates decide that they'd like to join Westerners, South Koreans and the Japanese and just have a bunch of cats instead of children?

Is there no sustainable middle ground between Japan and Bangladesh?

Yeah, Japan and South Korea's birth-rates tend to blow a lot of the lazier explanations out of the water like "it's the Jews fault, innit"

jacobitemag.com/2017/06/20/modernitys-fertility-problem/


Even if America was isolated and left to autophagic population reduction, humans wouldn't die out. Demography would merely shift in favor of certain religious sects (the Amish, Quiverfulls) and people with certain traits (those so stupid and irresponsible they fail to take birth control and start having kids when they're 16).

...

Don't think of it that way. Just think of it in a sense that if you're highly unintelligent you literally have one goal of existence. This is something pitiable, not a subject of envy.

This is a problem that personal responsibility is not going to solve, especially when about half of the political spectrum gets defensive over it. There are compelling economic and sociological reasons not to have children, and they ought to be addressed.

Religious nuts that actually practice what they preach are too rare in the US to be statistically significant, and sexual education in America is actively opposed for ideological reasons so I don't think there's any evidence that it'd fail naturally. In fact I would argue that abortion essentially keeps lumpen genetics in check because people who might have a hereditary predisposition to poor decision making would have an easy way out.

The real question is, is a birth rate below replacement level actually a bad thing? We have to assume this decline is necessarily permanent to make such a judgment. I don't think there is enough empirical evidence to draw any conclusions.

You're right, and it would be a worse situation without abortion, but there's still a negative correlation between fertility and intelligence.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertility_and_intelligence

There are pretty intuitive narratives which explain this. Intelligent women pursue careers, dumb women become teen mothers. Intelligent women become atheists, less intelligent women remain their birth religion.

Anti-natalists aren't building a world without people, they're building a world with only retards. I don't like a lot of the traits being selected for currently (although many traits being selected for are probably good, there's huge reproductive incentive for narcissism and low intelligence), so I don't like where the low birth rate is heading, or, I will like people less when it's at a point of stability.

The left can and should address this, because it's easy to understand and it's pulling the world towards fascism.

You guys didn't read the part where he said this could be combated by decreasing the birth rates of the other regions of the world instead of increasing our own?

Just because they are intuitive doesn't mean they are true. I Q as a grand unified theory of modern society would sure as hell be convenient, but reality doesn't care whether it's easy to understand.

Reading through this page, I think it's made pretty clear that fertility is a direct expression of material conditions. The idea that less intelligent people are more likely to spread their genes in the same material circumstances is contrary to the basis of general intelligence as a positive adaptive trait. I think the Flynn effect argument is pretty convincing.

Then why don't they just go out there and make lots of baby's by having lots of sex with wom-

Oh, wait…

You are asking to somehow magically weaken an opposing faction and not strengthening ours.

Oh, the one world, one race, one color, kumbaya.
Look nigger, in Africa they invented nothing for 100.000 years, we cant fill earth with blacks and wait another 100.000 years to see what happens, that window of opportunity is gone.

...

Pol is you once you have understood the jewish question, then they pretty much want the same you want but without jews and all the shit they have introduced in your head.

Yeah, fascism and communism, pretty much identical right?

Pol is mostly Not SocialisM, lets call it a sort of communism without international elements being sent to your country to kill your elites and peasant opposition and "redistribute" wealth among themselves.

Holy fuck, you guys are so kiked you have certain words automodified. First time i came here to challengemy views and im getting nice vibes so far.

He's saying we need to lower their birth rates too you ironically illiterate dipshit

Oh yes, now tell me how you are going to do that, specially with no population to enforce it and the remaining few cucked like you and singing kumbaya.

No thanks, I'm not going to play strawcuck for you you stupid stormnigger

Im genuinelly interested in how do leftist plan to lower fertility rates in the world when the only groups that preach them and practice them are disappearing and being replaced by high fertility peoples, precisely for putting it into practice.

by changing the economic conditions determining the decisions made by the high-fertility groups, in this case in terms of family planning
if you think whites have few kids because they are white and blacks have lots of kids because they are black, read a fucking history book and de-Holla Forums yourself

People living in less poverty fuck less, as third world industrializes (which is already happening) these rates will drop off and migration rates will also cool off so you'll be happy too (assuming no catastrophe wrt climate change or war which is incredibly unlikely at this rate)

But whites do have less children because they are white and blacks do have more children because they are black, it is due among other things to the fact that infant mortality has been rampant in places like Africa and high fertility was a desirable trait selected for and imbebed in their genes, it works like this even within ethnic groups, for example polish jews reacted to the worsening economic conditions in the 19th century by having more kids while christian poles reacted the opposite way.
You are giving me no information, just some vague bullshit like, "economic conditions", "family planning", and blablablas, no hard data, no historical examples, just your head full of shit.

...

But thats not true, as demonstrated by the differential in fertility rates of 3rd generation immigrants into the west compared to westerners, which is still higher even though they dont live in poverty anymore.

But those 3rd generation migrants do have lower birthrates than their grandparents.

You know materialism isn't applied on an individual or single-generational scale right? Like it's not literally "plug in X conditions for any person and they get exactly Y result". I feel like non-leftists and even a lot of leftists don't understand this.

the demographic transition model is pretty well established. Read the wiki en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition

it's like pottery, it thymes

european whites had similar birthrates 200 years ago
in 50 years birthrates plummeted, wow that's super fast evolution when it happens before there is even a new generation
and look, other regions exhibit similar change, except for africa, hmm why could that be it must be because those niggers just are so special
now go read a book, you are not cultured enough to hold opinions

But stil higher than westerners, and a small diferential will in the long run turn the demographics drastically, the middle east used to be christian and whiter.

Cultural momentum is a thing.

I mean different peoples have different customs, it is biological and they will adapt to whatever hellhole system we have in the west, but there will be differences and conflict, and as long as there is conflict within the peoples the system owners dont have to worry.
Population displacement and mixing is as old as Egypt, it is a form of political control.

they will continue to depress. the fact that the two haven't equalized over 2 generations means nothing and the trends are on my side

Customs are not biological, not even the most ardent race realists will make that claim.

European birth rates and marital ages change with economic conditions and it has been like this throughout the centuries, so? I simply dont get what you are trying to tell me. Blacks do have more children than anybody else, and when they do it in western countries they mostly end in prison, i rather have not blacks in my country than several millions of them filling the prisons.

Again this autistic technicalities, cultures are created by peoples, not the other way around, cultures also will shape people once they are in place. People are biological units, they have genetic predispositions towards certain behaviours and thats why some cultures are so different from others, and why when you import, for example, blacks into the US, a sizeable percentage of them ends in prison and welfare.

...

That's interesting…

So if the black working class people's economic situation changes along side with the rest of the working class in World, would like us to be in your country then?

He's trying to tell you that the reasons for them having more children are based on external factors rather than genetics, given that whites, who Holla Forums says are genetically predisposed to having less children than blacks, did have as many children in the past as the blacks do now. This implies an external cause. Therefore, if one wants to make sure that blacks don't outbreed whites, one needs to change these external causes in order to make sure that happens. In other words: one needs to make their countries and become like ours.


Or perhaps it is the material conditions that sorround a certain people that causes their culture to be what it is, rather than some mysterious culture-genes.

Both of these things are direct consequences of poverty. Even poor whites are likely to end up in prison and welfare. As for why the crime rates for blacks and hispanics are higher than those of whites, one can find several explanations, ranging from the smaller ammount of opportunities that are given to blacks to find a job and such (due to racism), the culture that they have created for themselves which incentivates and glorifies crime, or their higher levels of testosterone. Only one of these is genetic.

Do they emit some kind of pheromone that causes judges to give them harsher sentences for the same punishment and criminal record?

Is there a gene that gives them an innate sense of what is and is not illegal to do and tells them to break said laws, which are inherently arbitrary?

Or, let's be honest, do you just think blacks are evil?

Come on, enlighten me.

You are talking nonsense, blacks get lighter jail sentences than whites and felon blacks are even paid to stay out of crime in places such as California. Everyday there is a black person killing, torturing or raping a white and you hear none of this in the news exactly because it is nothing new, and it is a case of dog bites man, but when a man bites a dog, that is when a white kills a black, even if it is a cop killing an armed thug, you have it on the news for a month and riots and lootings all over the country.
There are genes that predispose you to violence, anger burst and many more, it is already stablished by geneticists and mainstream science, but i bet you dont read of those, it would give you too much cognitive dissonance, you live in a world of fantasy, you are the propaganda and you are retarded.
I dont think blacks are evil but i would rather waalk among a pack of silverbacks in Congo than withing a black guetto, at least gorillas wont take my wallet, if they ever attack me at all, i hope this answers your question.

Your fanfic is nice but it doesn't trump actual stats

Let me guess, Obummer gave out mini mansions to unemployed blacks too.

Your entire post is so completely disconnected from reality that even Holla Forums would become a little self-aware after reading it.

Ironically, the whole thing about violent genes functions as an argument in favour of mixing race, because that would mix the genes in a way that would decrease the prevalence of the violent ones.

Are pol tards really this stupid?
Protip you dumbasses should just stay in your basements.

From your friends at /k.

He is technically right about that part. What he likely doesn't know is that this predisposition is most likely epigenetic. He would also presumably babble about fake news if someone told him that crime rates in America have been rapidly declining for decades, independent of racial demographic.

Sure niggers, and affirmative action actually doesn't exist and its all some sort of white supremacist invention, give me some links and FBI stats so we can compare.

They been got rid of affirmative action you retard.

What the hell does affirmative action have to do with this? Are you so bitterly obsessed with blacks that you literally cannot stop screeching about it?

Just as blond hair and blue eyes dissapear when mating with blacks, other traits may also, you are talking nonsense.

Whats wrong, give me some sources, nigger.

Such as the violent genes?

You made the claims first, faggot. But you won't ever bring up stats to back up your own claims because you know you can't back them up so you meander into your fantasies of gorilla orgies instead

No, the black violence genes remain.

I bow before your superior knowledge of genetics.

I can't tell if this retard is worse or the people who read and quote one Lynn paper and know enough cherry picked stats to feign knowledge on the subject.

This kid is actually jontron tier though

Tell me user, what gene is responsible for White Europeans raping and colonizing all of Africa?

Remember user, it's not "rape and colonization" it's "spreading civilization and the word of God", their consent isn't required.

California paying felons to stay out of jail, most of them blacks and mexicans:
huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/04/richmond-california-anti-violence_n_7504554.html
More than 3000 murders and 30000 rapes a year by blacks, on FBI statistics, you can check them by yourself.

Just a recent example: Wichita Massacre Killers, in 2014 the Kansas Supreme Court, vacated all of the death sentences, citing the fact that the Carr brothers had been tried and sentenced together, rather than separately, Its 2017 and they are alive. Death sentences given to Dylann Roof have never been challenged.
35 years for this:
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4265496/Georgia-couple-given-years-prison-hate-crime.html
If you drop money into the judicial system you have more chances for lenient sentences, but that has nothing to do with being white or black, blacks are dirty poor though. You are just stupid as fuck and it should be normal that blacks got harsher sentences as the chance of them reinciding is astronomical and a high percentage of them lives in jail anyways.

...

You dont have to be a genius to have a look at Spain and then have a look at that mongrelized continen of South America and compare the level of developement and aggressive behaviour of mestizos with that of spaniards. It looks to me that the violence genes prevail.

First of all putting an end to the slave trade of Nort of Africa, where 1 million europeans were enslaved as late as the 18th century, and after that because thats how the this have been done forever, read some history you losers. You think the rest of the world shares your defective loser mentality and that you are not going to get raped and killed if civilization is not protecting you, you are up for a surprise.

Those are your favourite outlets, thats why i got them for you, they are in your line.

reddit.com/r/videos/comments/32i99e/black_judge_gives_armed_robbers_a_light_sentence/
You can get thousands of cases with a simple search.

So are the genes magically dissipating over time or something?

in other you just got here from your conservacuck hug box and think we're liberals

You are talking nonsense, all crime is dropping ok, but blacks are still overrepresented in jail population, violent crimes and so on, and will continue in the future even if crimes are dropping due to whatever reasons, one of them cops stopping to enforce law in certain areas, famous case Detroit, get lost kike.

No it's not. And this almost certainly isn't true, I.Q is positively correlated with kinship ties even if people are separated through adoption. This has been studied a lot.

It simply is not very computationally difficult (at least for women) to reproduce. Nobody would choose to be less intelligent, don't be a faggot and say that pattern recognition or arithmetic competence are bad because they make you have fewer kids if you live in a post-starvation society.

Flynn effect has been tapering off, and has increased mostly because of nutritional benefits and the removal of hazardous materials such as lead. Technological improvements which make children interface with more sophisticated technology may help, but it's very difficult to take lower preforming children and increase their relative Autism Level.

the Atlantic slave trade was far more brutal and practiced on a much larger scale.

post an academic study or shut up

If there were 3 violent crimes committed and 2 of them were by black perpetrators, your claim would still be true. It means nothing.

I came here to challenge my belief system and all im getting is talmudic jews looking for loopholes in my posts, starting to stench.

lmao, fuck off liberal

Exceptions do not disprove the rule: nytimes.com/2016/12/17/opinion/sunday/unequal-sentences-for-blacks-and-whites.html

Keep in mind that there isn't any systemic bias in favor or against any race, judges are just dicks that aren't obligated to do their job in an unbiased manner.

So your evidence are huffpo and dailymail rag pieces and fucking ledditor bullshit? Just kys already you're way too cancerous to allow to survive

No you didn't, why even lie about something so obviously untrue? Also I wouldn't call other people jews as an insult when you're such a blatant cuckservative who fellates zionists on the daily.

Look nigger, i deal with the real world, decades of national TV have shown almost none of the 3000 murders by blacks a year, and that doesn't mean they didn't happen, if you cant understand the deeply triggering and problematic bias everywhere you are retarded, or probably a nigger or a mongrel, and it benefits you too much to aknowledge it, the fact that theree are anti hate laws protecting minorities already make whites second class citizens in their own countries, just get lost.

Dude, your arguments are literally all unproven generalizations, anecdotal evidence, and unproven conclusions, whereas we are using statistics.

Maybe these statistics were invented by the jews in order to deceive whites! Or the whole global jewish conspiracy thing is schizo-level paranoia.

...

I Q is correlated with practically everything that results from a healthier and more productive society because on a large scale it is a measurement of human development. Genetic predisposition to high cognitive ability doesn't mean shit if you're sick, malnourished and mentally understimulated.

It is pretty difficult if you die because you are stupid, and modern society has yet to discover how to save idiots from themselves.

Heritability of intelligence varies based on age, and the reason for this heritability matters, i.e. simply being below average is not the same as having a developmental disorder.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_world_syndrome

I now understand what is like to talk to a tranny sitting in his moms basement.

Im using FBI statistics and everyday local news, since national news dont show 99% of the crimes black commit against whites.

it's like violent crime isn't actually worthy of headlines

The Autism Level question is already solved, there have been billions dropped at blacks in the US for special training and educational programs and the gap is still there, maybe 100 years ago some idiot could go to Africa and see how they operate and still believe they would be traveling to mars in a hundred years only if we gave them all the gibs they wanted and affirmative action to Harvard, today it has been disproved by the hard and cold reality. Intelligence heritability varies based on age, that means once you reach maturity you have reached your peak Autism Level and thats when Autism Level correlates better with heritability, since before that enviromental factors will have a bit more influence, nothing more.

Well, i dont see 100 crime stories of violent murders, rapes and tortures produced by blacks on national TV, and that is short of what happens everyday in the US, get lost nigger.

This is why women aren't fucking you en masse fyi

You want to solve violence with violence in such a way that is becoming increasingly unpopular, not to mention untrue, and then beg to question

Why don't the white women like me? Let alone, let's just consider, women who aren't white.

It's because you are your own problem and will continue to be that way until you've become your own minority and that, is your problem

But they are, although i know you trannies and faggots are very promiscuous and i cant compare.

LOL

...

BUT

THEY

Damn, 2 hours here and not a single link, not a single statistic, infograph, nothing, just trannies and hasbara jews, and talmudic twistings, im out.

...

Look at this infograph, every time I do it makes me laugh

That's because most of us are in college, most of you aren't, and we can see when something is pushed the original paper would find dubious as fuck

Muh graphs

...

It contributes to human development. China is not generally a better place to live than Norway, but they have a higher average I.Q.

Genetic predisposition to high cognitive ability makes a huge difference once most people are not sick, malnourished, or mentally understimulated, which a lot of societies really are progressing to (at the moment).

Fucking retarded.

Death from injury is extremely rare, and does not remove that many people from the gene pool. Plus, we do save a lot of idiots from themselves- see mental hospitals and social security for the mentally impaired.

None of this suggests that the heritability of intelligence is unimportant, or that the difference between 80 and 120 I.Q points is unimportant.

Do we really want to bring up lives fam?

Blacks kill less people yearly than capitalism kills monthly.

That's because you're a fucking liar

When your average Holla Forumsyp looks like this and it's not hard to strike up conversation with women about communism today, and not being a nazi, and you know not being a nazi, also not being a nazi

It's really hard to take you seriously with this shit anymore

I'm tired of you fags defaulting to calling the people who disagree with you virgins and losers.

Are you only into this shit to get laid? Why the fuck does socialism attract so many lifestylers who just want to be cool and sexually promiscuous?

I really don't give a shit what you're tired of because issues like these aren't related to class, and if they refuse to help themselves so be it, fuck em

Particularly given the topic

A Holla Forumsack is genuinely right if they say that individually starting a family is barely putting a dent in the problem. This is a massive, global demographic trend which springs from political, economic, and sociological pressures, it is rightly treated as a political topic. Making this a subject of individual accountability makes as much sense as making poverty a subject of individual accountability.

If you aren't interested in anything unrelated to class, then whatever, but this probably is (in some way) related to class, and you're dishonest if at any point you believe you're flaming people for talking about stuff you're merely not interested in.

hahahahahahahahahaha

You fucking idiot it's they're fault they're in this situation and it's impossible for them to right it without measures involving genocide or subjugation so why is it even worth it?

They're no talent, no fucking Autism Level, no fucking life morons, who don't give a shit abotu the consequences of their lives and actions and are growing increasingly unpopular in the west despite their "best efforts" to "defend it" by making themselves publically known

It is not their decision who controls life, no one alive has ever had the power to change these things, and neither will Holla Forums. Holla Forums at best can only hurt themselves socially and psychologically

And really if they refuse help and refuse to admit they fucked up,. and refuse to read on countless issues, and refuse to admit class is above identity

that

is

their

fault

They have no answers, and they've done this for so many times the last four years that mocking them the same way is just what happens.


Yes, then whatever

National I Q is a whole different debate since the only proposed numbers for a majority of the world were basically ass pulled by one old Britbonger that twisted them around to have a strong racial correlation: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nations_and_intelligence#Limitations_and_criticisms_of_the_IQ-data_collections

That a large portion of the world hasn't gotten to that point is why I think making broad generalizations is hazardous at the moment.

Death from injury, maybe. Death from preventable causes in general is extremely common. It's pretty easy to die of a heart attack or overdose before you can shit out another five babies.
Mental illness is also a poor argument since high I Q is positively correlated with it.

It depends on what you mean by "important". Any leftist that isn't afraid of books knows that the "true equality" line is a straw man; literal inequality between people does not necessitate or justify hierarchy in government. A dullard is no less entitled to the fruit of his labor, nor is someone with a sharp mind any less of a leech for extracting his surplus labor.

The point was that you aren't disinterested, you're asshurt, and you are.

Holla Forums is trying to eventually affect state action. Just because no individual can do anything about the current state of affairs doesn't mean the current state of affairs is unchangeable, it means there has to be a concerted response from a collective. There have been plenty of historical changes no individual is wholly responsible for.

Insulting people does not make them wrong. Eugenics just isn't that stupid, no matter how much you whinge about fascism.

Ah yes, the "everyone making fun of virgin nazis is actually hurt by them" theory

Just like everyone was hurt by atheist neckbeards and everyone was hurt by furries.

I really like your logic

Here's the thing

How are you going to save the white race when nobody wants to fuck you?

Pictured, Holla Forums's competence in getting their way

Only in the First World, where more and more become petit bourgeoisie.

Bitch you can't even have sex one how the fuck you gonna knock anyone up force it on them, and how are you going to make that political action,

Y'all are stupid this isn't going to help you at all, your decline in Europe and America is fucking rapid. Getting more popular isn't helping you, it's sealing your fucking fate and making everyone goddamn socialist. You are so cringy your sudden popularity has caused the opposite to happen and now everyone is worried about class instead of race, and nearly all women are open to socialism now.

Congratulations on doing our job for us you really are a fucking Machiavellian genius

Being open to socialism and theory has knocked me up five times on campus already

why on Earth should I support you

Capitalism is ruining the planet, pitting ourselves against each other, and your prime concern is fucking white girls getting pregnant?

Honestly this is why people dunk on you all over the place now, you're not welcome because your politics is fucking freakish

God damnit, I'm not even Holla Forums (unless you think literally anybody who cares about measurements of intelligence is Holla Forums). I'm just sick of the people here being useless poseurs who use politics as a means to gain entry to campus social events.

If you don't believe anything that's fine, but leave the world to people who actually give a shit about it.

so much for the tolerant left.
Leftypol apart of the same jagged coin as pol. Before you retards call me pol ill say I'm from b shitposting on break.

Glad most of you faggots are like pol and will never seize power.

You can do both. In fact. Organizing is necessary. You're the problem by being stuck in your books and nothing else.

Last snap election showed this more than anything else.


On the contrary you dumb bitch

Based on , convincing you to be a white nationalist literally consists in telling you how it could get you laid.

I'd say that the reason that a lot of young people aren't having children are because of having no money to support children, people aren't meeting each other anymore, so stronger communities and maybe even match makers? Plus women are required to work so they can't stay home and look after the kids and have adequate love and parental bonding with them, So give men enough money to support all of them with his sole job.
Pretty much you just need communism. Look at east germany in the 60s, they were having a million children and everyone loved their lives.

That's never going to happen so it doesn't matter at all. White nationalism is unattractive is my point. It's a correct point.

Do you tell everybody you're a communist? I mean, you're a student, so you might, but eventually it will be a secret around a lot of people (employers and some coworkers, for example).

With the far right, it's a secret around everybody. That doesn't make much of a difference, though. There are plenty of intentionally apolitical people to blend in with, and it's easy and probably healthy to avoid talking about political stuff anyways.

Hahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahaha

oh man, how can you fucking be so stupid every response

I've met at least ten people on campus who browse Holla Forums in class they're fucking clueless

Not anymore

I mean, it should be a secret. If you know what you're doing you don't talk about it.


It's more easy than ever now. "With the state of things I don't want to get mixed up in it, people get way too resentful."

HAHAHAHAA