Any good meme's for refuting Holla Forumss autistic "Race +IQ" nonsense?

The individual is superior to the group average.
Also they make total non-sequiturs from that premise.

There are none because it's true.

On what do you base your assumption that it isn't? Does evolution stop at the neck, allowing different populations to differ in all characteristics but the ones induced by the brain?

I agree. The tests are a nice supporting argument, but I want non-Whites gone in either case.

OP Here
Part 1
Adoption studies are the most effective method for attempting to quantify just how much of the black-white Autism Level gap is genetic versus environmental. By ensuring that blacks & whites are reared in the same environment, one can conclude any differences that arise are genetic. Inversely, by ensuring that two groups of blacks are genetically similar, we can conclude that any differences that arise are environmental. There are four major transracial adoption studies that I know of. I will consider each.
Study 1: Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study
I'm sure many of you have heard of this study, so I need not give it too much detail. Basically, the study examined the Autism Level test scores of adopted children of different races & of non-adopted white children, all of whom were raised by white families. The study found higher Autism Level for the whites adoptees compared to the black adoptees [1]. If this study did indeed equalize the environments for blacks & whites, then the results would seem to indicate that the Autism Level gap is largely genetic. However, there are two reasons to doubt that the study equalized the environments for blacks & whites:
(a) the children with two black parents were adopted substantially later than the other children. The average white child was adopted at about 19 months old, but the average child with two black parents was adopted at 32 months old [2]. The results of the study showed that children who were adopted later had much lower Autism Levels than those who were adopted earlier. Black children adopted within one year of birth had Autism Levels 7 points higher than those adopted later, for example [3].
(b), while the study did somewhat equalize environments after adoption, they failed to equalize environments before adoption. This can be extremely important as well. For example, a high blood lead level in infants can result in a noticeable reduction in Autism Level during adulthood [4]. Blood lead level is particularly important for the blacks in this study because when this study was published in the 1970s, the blood lead level of black children aged 6 months-5 years was extremely higher than the level for white children of the same age [5]. Thus, lead could have played a significant role in the black children's Autism Level. Blood lead level is just one example. Factors such as social stimulation before adoption are also important to a child's cognitive development, but the study could not have equalize such factors.
Study 2 German Autism Level study by Klaus Eyferth
This was a study conducted by psychologist Klaus Eyferth concerning the Autism Levels of white and racially mixed children in West Germany. The mothers of the children studied were white German women, while their fathers were white or black members of the US occupation forces. The white children recorded an average Autism Level of 97.2, whereas the mixed children recorded an average of 96.5, a negligible difference [6].
Some have discounted this data by asserting that the samples aren't representative of the average population because about 30% of black applicants were rejected and not admitted to the armed forces, while only about 3% of whites were rejected. It is true that the samples are not representative, but that doesn't discount the results of the study. Despite the unrepresentative sample, if Autism Level were genetic, then we would still expect the white children to have much higher scores that the black children because:
(a) The white GIs should have had higher scores than the black GIs. It is true that both the white soldiers and the black soldiers in this study had Autism Levels above a certain threshold; however, the Autism Level scores for the white soldiers would be distributed higher than the blacks, leading to a higher average score. If the Autism Level gap were genetic, then we would expect this difference to be found in their children as well.
(b) Regression to the mean. Even if the white soldiers and black soldiers had similar Autism Level scores, then, if the Autism Level gap were genetic, we would still expect the black children to have lower Autism Levels than the white children. The reason is because the black kids' Autism Levels would regress downward to the black mean of 85, while the whites kids' Autism Levels would regress to the white mean of 100. Of course the gap between the white & black kids would be smaller because both groups would have white mothers, but the gap would be larger than 0.7 points.
The lack of an Autism Level difference in this study means that the results are not compatible with genetics being the biggest cause of the Autism Level gap. Like the Minnesota study, the study is flawed in its own way. Nevertheless, it is compatible with a 100% environmental explanation.

Literally Feelz>Realz

Part 2

Study 3 British study of young children in nurseries
In this study, psychologist Barbara Tizard studied black, white, and mixed-race children raised in British long-stay residential nurseries. The children were given psychological tests to determine their cognitive abilities. The scores were converted to give a mean of 100, and a standard deviation of 10. On one test, the white children scored 102.6 and the black/mixed children scored 106.3. On another test, the white children scored 98.5 and the black/mixed children scored 98.6. On the Minnesota Nonverbal test, the white children scored 101.3 and the black/mixed children scored 107.7 [7]. Apparently there is a fourth test, but I didn't manage to see it in the pdf. In any case, this study clearly does not support the genetic theory. This study is compatible with a 100% environmental explanation of the Autism Level gap.
Study 4: Autism Level scores of black children raised by white families versus Black families
In this study, psychologist Elsie Moore compared Autism Level test scores among 23 black children adopted by middle-class white families and 23 age-matched black children adopted by middle-class black families. Their findings indicate that the black children adopted by black families scored a 104 Autism Level, while the black children adopted by white families scored a 117 Autism Level [8]. Clearly, these two groups of blacks differed in their environment and not their genes. Therefore, the difference in the black/white family environments must account for the 13 Autism Level points. Keep in mind that the black & white families were of similar socioeconomic status (middle-class). In actuality, the average black family has a much lower socioeconomic status than the average white family, therefore the difference in black/white environments would account for more than 13 points, accounting for essentially the entire Autism Level gap. Clearly, this study is compatible with a 100% environmental explanation of the Autism Level gap.
Many have criticized the three latter studies because they did not do follow-up testing on the children. It is true that the genetic component of Autism Level increases as children age. However, this decline is not necessarily relevant. We are concerned with the gap between blacks & whites. The Minnesota Transracial Study implies that there is no significant change in the gap after age 7. Looking at this study, the black-white Autism Level gap fluctuated by only about 2 points after age 7. Therefore, the lack of a follow-up study is no good reason to discount the latter three studies. If the Autism Level gap was small for younger children, then it would likely remain as such.
Conclusion: It seems to me that the evidence suggests that the Autism Level gap is almost entirely environmental. The Minnesota is the only adoption study that suggests otherwise, but it has flaws, as I've indicated earlier. The German study also has its flaws, so it's not clear which of those two studies should be preferred. In any case, the latter two studies seem to confirm the German study. So three of the studies are compatible with a 100% environmental explanation of the Autism Level gap. Taking a comprehensive account of all of the adoption studies seems to suggest that the Autism Level gap is, for the most part, environmental. The only way one could conclude otherwise is if they blindly accepted only one of the studies and ignored the other three that contradicted it. At best, one could argue that there's a negligible 1-5 point genetic Autism Level gap between blacks & whites. Anything more is wishful thinking, based on the data.

TLDR: Nazi Scum get's BTFO.

Feels are the basis of decision-making. Even if one accepts certain facts, the interpretation of these facts depends on one's emotional disposition.

Not wanting to get murdered is just a feel, as is not wanting to be poor - though some people do want to get murdered, and some people do want to be poor. It's feels all the way down.

That said: it is objectively bad* to have niggers and/or Muslims in one's country.

* "Bad" meaning "disadvantageous on several commonly accepted metrics such as crime, workforce participation, political violence, community trust, intelligence".

You do not know the distribution of the Black soldiers, and the null hypothesis in such cases is that it's Gaussian. The filter that the admission to the army (and likely other factors) played effectively shifted the Autism distribution of that subpopulation to the right vis-a-vis the general Black population in the US.

Utter drivel. Regression to the mean isn't some magical force that hard-codes a value of 85 of Black Autism Levels. If you take a subpopulation of Blacks with an average Autism Level of 110 and breed them, then regression to the mean will keep the scores of subsequent generations near 110 (barring outside influence). It doesn't matter (and how the fuck could it?) that there are some other Blacks somewhere in Africa that have average scores of 65, unless you propose that they're linked by some ether-connection.

Partially true. Heritability of Autism Level is negligible at a young age, but is shown mostly during adulthood (about 80% heritable).
00a6514b-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/philoclubksu/club-info/topics/oct25thethicaleugenics/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf?attachauth=ANoY7cphFE-R66kUfj9PSlF8gJgkzJGGIbDA-zRGHTPEEPhBs2kDOKG7mano6rS15Ff0a0hEorSHvrNnQ3BK87gV2wBUfxWwPTpRUFykIlCT9P-2u2M9-NDHaJ2DwNxRgDpy1sx9gU4LePjbyKJjd8bwo-Xo40Pc4SdL21alMRSQP2OyY-RvY3UCsqST8um6O7pvQDZhtM2btE4v70HjVZUJH3Jwlv66Tj1v3y4Y26aBEkA42DzrYBTO7UbfZifSh3WSwl_ZCO8Kv6xpcQrhn0N87FEHDShTcyfJiReYv7--LZLZ7MZ5nhA=&attredirects=0

>Autism Level
Ebin :DD I meant +I.Q.

Wrong. One can't be empathetic and logical at the same time, one cancels out the other.
blog.case.edu/think/2012/10/30/empathy_represses_analytic_thought_and_vice_versa

...

Untrue. Every race has the same amount of intelligence. You're a fucking retard if you think some test is going to show any difference in how life outcomes happen.

Races don't exist so I wish you'd stop bringing dumb shit like that up.

That explains why rich blacks have higher I.Q.s than poor whites which is definitely something I will not look up since that's racist as fuck.

thanks for the pdfs but I don't see the point when we all know that I.Q. is a big meme done by the porky to keep down the workers!! !

It's really weird how they are treating Black American (who have significant amounts of northern european genestock in them from all that rape) to Africans but I guess niggers all look the same so w/e

Stellar argument. I bet you're also a master at prooftexting in your Bible study group.

Why is Autism Level and blacks Holla Forums's favorite topic? They never come out for any other subject.

That's not true and I resent that slander. We talk plenty about the Jews too.

Interesting, but never any talk of how compared to Jews or Asians, whites might as well be albino blacks.

This kills the Nazi.

Why do I have to qualify my racism by pointing to psychometric data anyway? That's already a losing position.

Negros just creep me out on a visceral level. I'm sorry but it's true.

Psychometric data showing they incontrovertibly dumber is just a cherry on top.

Huh, really ticked the engine over.

They're our enemies, why wouldn't we hate the fact that they have power?

You're being evolutionary out competed by hook nose big toothed dark haired Anglos and Heebs, this is natural selection, deal with it

That's what you'd like, wouldn't you, my big-nosed friend? :)

yeah by the way that they lie and scheme and steal theyve been able to do a lot of harm to white countries. It's a shame.

...

...

The greatest mistake of the common man's analysis of history is that Hitler was a pied piper who seduced the German people and destroyed their country. On the contrary, Hitler and his ideology were the ultimate expression of everything German. Inside the heart of every individual belonging to the so called Germanic race is a ruthless, paranoid, insecure, self pitying totalitarian pervert whose means of compensating is projecting the collective insecurities of his people onto whatever the supposed "other" was convenient for him at the time, in this case the Jews. The German ideology is not positive. It does not build, but only seeks to destroy. What these barbarians do not understand is that if they had their way and all the "degenerates" were gone they would be left to themselves. These sorry excuses for human beings would be cold, afraid, empty inside, and have no one to blame. Truly a horrifying fate.

But what makes them so competitive? Their uncompromising identity and nepotistic in group preference? The higher intelligence of their Ashkenazi elite? How they seek to gain positions of power within foreign nations while remaining loyal only to theirs? All of the above?

Maybe we should all emulate them in order to be more competitive.

Read this book.

Germans tried playing geopolitics and failed, history chose against them, they reaped what they sowed.

...

classic

lol

Stirnerpill this user.

cute image though

Who actually cares other than deliberately malicious bourgeois snakes and their lackeys? Doesn't matter how dumb or smart you are, a worker is still a worker and a capitalist is still a capitalist.

The whole obsession with race and Autism Level is just an attempt to make workers fight one another. It's a bourgeois obsession to distract workers. It does not justify hierarchy. It stems directly from eugenics, which was a tool of the elites to control and subjugate the workers by painting them as genetically, mentally and socially inferior. By painting the nature of society and economics relations as "just so", unfixed, natural, unchangeable etc, it just serves as ideology to justify the position of the bourgeoisie over the proletariat, the coloniser over the colonised, the landlord over the tenant, the slaver over the slave, and so on. It's no coincidence that the whole field over eugenics and race/intelligence only emerged when European empires briefly dominated the world in the late 1800s; they had to look for justification of the brutal treatment and exploitation of millions of people. The whole field is tainted and should be ignored or eliminated.

Jews and Japs are smarter than your snow nigger ass so sit the fuck down while adults are talking.

Google:intergenerational spiral of crime and marvel at the wonders of capitalism and cast out your retarded racialism

Prove it. Because I'm not sure whether this is true or not.

who's the guy with the retarded hair and beard style whose head is photoshopped on everyone?

t. newfag