Why do so many neo-""leftists"" push for open immigration?

why do so many neo-""leftists"" push for open immigration?

More competition for jobs pushes wages down. That increases profits.
Porky wants it.

Corbyn isn't for "open immigration." Also immigration doesn't hurt workers, porky does.

Guilt over colonialism, Nazism, and slavery, post-Christian desire to atone for past civilizational wrongs, and romanticization of third-world peoples as a result of anti-imperialism and identity politics becoming the primary mode of leftist thought (import the revolution!)

Because that means there are more foreign girls to fuck.

But 70% of current migrants in Europe are male…

This. My ideal immigration policy would require 3 14-30 year old women for every one man of any age.

1) Underlying dream of removing borders all together.
2) Refugees deserve refuge
3) Enlarges proletariat

Free movement of people should be an ideal leftists strive for; however, that is quickly perverted under neoliberal capitalism as they strive to bring wages down worldwide by either creating more competition for work like said or by just shipping those jobs overseas.

It's a good ideal, but doesn't reflect our current reality. is right

That's because I don't write the immigration policy.

This.
Liberal values are the best but capitalism fucks them up and makes them untenable.

What do you hope to achieve by keeping the immigrants out?

Avoiding getting blown up in the name of Allah is a start. Stopping the American military behemoth is untenable for the average person, but stopping Muslim migration is far easier.

But then how will I be able to cum on a muslim girl's head and ask her to wear her hijab for the rest of the day? Your plan doesn't sound tenable to me.

Free movement of people is not a good ideal at all, it only means lower wages for workers and the middle class and alot more Money for the elite. It is a crazy ideal that only benefits the rich.

Muslim ones, in particular, are big help with solving the kike problem.

idpol, it’s a censor. Also people automatically assume nationalism is right-wing which is false.

Who am I kidding, the alt-right would love Islam if it wasn't an Arab invention. It's no surprise that Hitler was a fan.

...

Fucking idiot, did you just stop reading my post halfway through? I acknowledge that. Post-capitalism, the free movement of people is a great ideal.

idk man, maybe if we stop bombing them they'll stop bombing us?

Did the swedes run muslims over too?
Cut the cliches

Did you even read? Literally any non-American can vote to protect themselves from Islamic terror by not having Muslims. The Japanese employ this strategy very effectively. You are not easily going to stop a country that can effectively print an infinite amount of money to finance its military from doing what it wants to do in the Middle East, but you can insulate yourself from the consequences.

...

...

...

Borders necessarily entail private property.

If you are for borders you are not a leftist.

If you can't stop one you're not stopping the other you massive dimwit

Because borders are racist and punching down is not self defense.

10/10

Ok comrade, if you say so.

Why? It's very easy to stop. Stop offering benefits packages to new migrants from Muslim countries, turn away migrant boats, refuse to re-settle refugees, and actually deport people who try to sneak in. It's cruel, but you won't have an Islamic terror problem.

When they bring ultra-reactionary religiosity with them, they aren't really getting any.

Because modern capitalism relies on the Muslim bogeyman to continue pillaging the middle East and immigration in general to undermine domestic worker protections and to inflate profits. "Immigration" is hardly a factor now anyway as just about all the most recent terror attacks were perpetrated by natives of parents that immigrated a generation or more ago, pointing to the reality of deeper social issues than just scary Muslims, not the least of which are 1) the complete breakdown of social mobility and 2) the very real possibility that domestic security and intelligence services are not only aware of, but also facilitating these terror attacks, so even if you did wave your idiot magic wand to stop immigration, it's likely they would just import them anyway like the US did with the Saudi 9 11 attackers.

So the only real reason you'd have to oppose immigration for the vast majority of innocent people being driven from their homes by the system you passively enable at this stage is to satisfy your own faggot racial revanchism.

Free movement of labour is as important as free movement of capital.

plus it breaks down national identity he he ;] x

Wall building does not solve the problem, and is a bit against our integrity

Why is it so hard to believe he wants to " stop offering benefits packages to new migrants from Muslim countries, turn away migrant boats, refuse to re-settle refugees, and actually deport people who try to sneak in" but also pull out the military and nationalize a ton of shit to distribute its products and profits from the sale of excess to the nation's citizens?

Abolition of borders works if the people coming in do not belive that child marriage, sharia law and islam are good things. Seriously i'm an hardcore socialist, but everyone who want to talk about islamic refugees should read the koran and visit their country.

This is true.

We should do for able bodied male Syrian refugees precisely what they did for the revolution happening in their country. Nothing.

No, I don't want to get blown up, and Islam is not a race.

So, why encourage it?

Stop making the problem worse.

Maybe, but why make it easy?

It doesn't take a genius to diagnose the causes of the current Muslim diaspora, but discussions of avoiding Islamic terror attacks tend to degenerate into the following circular pattern:

That's wrong tho retard, there can be borders and communally-owned property. Native Americans distinguished their lands from those of other local tribes and they didn't just tell white people "lol u guys r refugees u can come in and it's ok if you take our land too because borders are fascist."

I agree, deporting of right wingers to siberia when

I can believe that's what he wants, but it's completely divorced from reality, or any kind of human decency.


Yeah, you're a real hardcore socialist, so then why are you backing up this reactionary bullshit? You're going to deny a safety to thousands of people because of what a few may do? If you're a socialist then you're a shitty one.

Why are we speaking of human decency on a board where many of us reject morals as a bourgeois fiction and support mass killings in the name of eliminating reactionary elements? Never mind that if we ignored their brown faces, Muslims would be considered reactionary elements, of course - typically more right-wing than the nuttier American Christian fundamentalists.

Territory is the earliest and most primitive form of property, but it's property all the same.

Were the Bolsheviks wrong to defend Russia against Nazi aggression?

An armed invasion by a national military force bent on your annihilation isn't at all comparable to the refugee situation.

Exacly
Which means if you lived hundreds years ago you would have additional tax and would not have some of the political rights. that's it.
Today no muslim country has dhimma.

No, they wouldn't like non-racist religion about being good person ("cuck" in their language)

Notice that it is an universalist religion, meanwhile he hated judaism, a racist religion. Right winger does the opposite.
There is no comparison of Hitler to a rightwinger.

Why didn't the Soviets just let anyone into their country? Surely there were needy African babies in the 1920s-50s why was Uncle Joe such a sh*tlord by allowing Soviet workers to become well-off before some far-off peoples in need were well-off.

There were no African refugees because America (and Europe) weren't intentionally turning Africa into a war torn shithole like they are today.

What the fuck is this shit? When did I said that we shouldn't let immigrants in or we shouldn't help them? What I said is that right wingers and left wingers should both read the koran and go visit their country before talking.

Probably because this is kind of an antimaterialist stance to human behavior.

I know right. The people in other countries are just inherently inferior. We should keep them out to avoid polluting the gene pool.

-Carl Marks

...

he was going in right direction in the second picture and then descended into a retard

...

Immigrants are proles. Open borders is a way of countering the fluidity of capital by making it so wages in those countries rise as the people experience better lives in the higher wage western countries. It builds class consciousness in poorer countries.

Neo-lib shill