What the hell was his problem??

What the hell was his problem??

Other urls found in this thread:

sinistra.net/lib/upt/bollet/guua/guuabhoboi.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

He sacrificed everything to build socialism only for Stalin to destroy it

Character assassination

I'd love to meet him and pick his brain :^)

The terrorism book and Kronstadt were his only worthwhile contributions

menshevism

He both looks like and actually is an incarnation of Satan?

He destroyed Kronstadt and Makhno.

Wished I could gas the kike.

Too Jewish.

His only problem is that he was not Nazbol.

why?

Dumbass got killed.

A DotP wouldn't last if it backed down from an uprising. No matter how much in the right you think the sailors were, it's silly to expect the Bolsheviks to not respond to the revolt with violence.

...

you're spamming this dude in every thread. I don't even know who it is.

Is this what a Holla Forums-raid looks like?

I bet a million pesos that it's Latin Americans. 27chan or something.

Spics are the masters of torrential nonsensical shitposting.

I don't hate Trotsky at all, I just think the terrorism book outshines everything else that I've read of his

this is true, spics and leafs and slavs are the worst shit posters by far

hearty rofl

A Leftcom that actually has a sense for reasonable realpolitik, now this is rare

But a DotP must consist of proletarian self-activity in order to be acknowledged as such. Lenin's cadreist vanguardism was very different from the truly proletarian vanguardism of Bordiga, and hence Bordiga cannot be considered a Leninist, for the better. At best, he adopted some ideas from Lenin into actual communist praxis and theory.
I assume you're a Bordigian leftcom
By the time the sailors were forced to revolt, the insurrection and resulting communization had already ended, and war communism marked the reintroduction of value production. If they had succeeded in toppling the Bolsheviks and returned all power to the soviets, that would have been a DotP, with the soviets playing roles akin to the Council of the Paris Commune within their respective areas.

Both Bordiga and Bordigists supported the suppression of the revolt: sinistra.net/lib/upt/bollet/guua/guuabhoboi.html

I disagree with your characterization of Bordiga not being a real Leninist. I suggest reading his "Fundamentals of Revolutionary Communism", this passage regarding Stalin is particularly telling on his views:
"In our fight against the Stalinist betrayal, we have always considered its distortions of economic theory as a thousand times more serious than the 'abuse of power' which so scandalised Trotskyists and Khruschevians, or the famous ’crimes’ which world philistinism keeps on harking on about…Every criticism and ’improved’ programme put out by all the various so-called anti-Stalinist groups relies on the ridiculous notion that there needs to be a detoxification – sterilisation as far as the revolution is concerned – of the Party and the State, forms (according to the extremely hackneyed thesis of ’the tyrant and his cronies’) which were supposedly abused by Stalin because of his "insatiable lust for power". It is important show that all those who nurture this bigoted preoccupation (and who probably want to be leaders, and crave personal success, themselves) have succumbed, as far as economic and social matters are concerned, to the same reactionary illusion as Proudhon: they are blind to the fact that the historical opposition between communism and capitalism means that communism and socialism are opposed to mercantilism."

Cared more about bitches than socialism.

ok we bolsheviks have destroyed kulaks, removed other parties, nationalized all thats needed, we have mostly completed whats necessary, the work on the revolution,
should we move to actually running a society instead of looting?
No.

He foresaw 1991 in 1923. Just like lenin did during the Georgian affair.

Only retards believe the character assassination campaigns against him. Truth was and always will be, that Lenin wanted trotsky to take over and that Stalin did exactly what Trotsky said he would, he murdered intra-party democracy and his legacy of corrupt petty-bourgeoisie lackeys in key party positions is what slowly rotted the ussr from the inside.

History essentially proved him right.

He had the makings of a great and characteristically Russian leader in that he was ready to impose orders on everyone from the top without any say from those below.


You're the only namefag I've ever liked

...

Time to wear the scarlet F.

Have you ever read the demands that the kronstadt sailors made? I think that anyone who would deny the people of a city the right of free press is opposed to liberating mankind.

smelly dumb anarkiddie scum

free to do what mate, print anti-revolution propaganda? why dont you fuck off

...

Orwell was correct to rat on retards like you. Marxism-Leninism was a mistake.

Hello, Bob Black.

orwell was a liberal just like you

The Russian SFSR was being attacked on all fronts. Everyone was trying to kill them.

It's retarded to demand and uprise for such things during such a dire situation.

wew lad

rip my sweet prince

Trotsky done fucked up siding with the Mensheviks early on. He didn't even believe most of their shit, he was just pissy Lenin kicked them from Iskra. If Trotsky actually followed his writings and started bolshevik and wasn't the spokesman of the mensheviks, he probably wouldn't have gotten his ass handed to him by Stalin.

Lenin did not want Trotsky to take over.

Dubs, truth.

Correct.

That and a lot of their demands were petty-bourgeois as fuck

Stalin was his problem

Orwell knew exactly what he was doing and those guys deserved it.

Nekulturny scrub requesting precise sources, please.

Judaism is a helluva drug.

Why don't you remind us of all the great MLs who actually served in the wars they claimed to represent and experienced combat firsthand alongside their fellow proles? Lenin? Stalin? Mao? Trotsky None of them.

Now let's be reminded of all the great anarchists who served in the wars they claimed to represent and experienced combat firsthand alongside their fellow proles? Makhno? Orwell? Durrati? All of them.

Your leaders are all class traitors. Ancom/Ansyn is closer to real socialism then you are or ever will be. Suck it, MLs.

*Only retards believe the Trotskyite character assassination campaigns against Stalin.
Fixed that for you.

dgaf all touts are targets.

I've said it once. I'll say it again. Anarchists are retarded.

How is free press bad?

If you're good, you have nothing to fear from free press. If you're bad, then it's a damn good thing there's a free press to print all the bad stuff you're doing so the people can be informed and take action.

Because in the 20th century a select few big media magnates completely controlled the memes of production through mass media. Now that we live in an age of information anarchy, freedom of speech has become a lot more interesting.

...

...

I hope you realize that this beloved freedom of speech for bourgeois media paves the way for lies and ideology very easily. You only need to take a look at the tons of lies made up about socialist countries in the past and social democracies today.

pointing a finger and saying "attack this" doesn't count as fighting a war firsthand, faggot.

nod an argumend :DDDD

So there should be no dissent? Blind faith in the leader and nothing else? What if you disagree? What if they do bad things?

this is why no one likes anarchists.

I like anarchists