What do we do about the shitty redditors that come here ?

Had me until there. Pedos and weebs will get the bullet too.
Kys parasitic scum.

haha what a story zizek

you are one of them arent you

Trigger them.

Maybe in the backwater shithole you live in they tolerate pedos, but in my country pedos and weebs are walking right on the line of society thinking they should be shot anyway.
I'm not saying I would have any say, but general society would.

>pedos and weebs
whats wrong with weebs?

You don't have the right to control other people's bodies, and they have every right to shoot you for trying, which is exactly what's going to happen.

t. gun owner

The former are facing an involuntary psychiatric disorder which requires counseling and treatment and the latter are just people who like anime and Japanese shit.

Quit being silly.

If your country defines pedo as under 18, your country should probably not exist anymore.

>>>/reddit/

lmao

This.

Weebism is very often an expression of pedophilia. Lusting after "cute" "innocent" girls is pedophilic.

so what

t. 35 year old feminazi landwhale

Dude what. Weebism is just being overly obsessed with anime. I would consider myself semi-weeb, loli porn is fucking gross.
Also cute is a term used to refer to attractive girls in english in general and innocence is not age-related, although liking "innocent" girls is fucking trash tier taste.

"Hot" is a term used for attractive girls. "Cute" is used exclusively by pedophiles.

Haha holy shit the edge. I live in a section of the world with, by far, the most guns per capita, in a state with, by far, the most guns per capita. We also have a long history of lynching people society deemed unfit to live alongside us. I have enough guns in my house alone to arm everyone living in it twice.

I don't have as much as a problem with weebs, but they intentionally depict women to be as young as possible, and 'birds of a feather' applies well here. I know a weeb and simply put they are a systematic drain on society.
I'm not even Nazbol or other authoritarian idealogy.

...

Listen mate if even a second language speaker like me knows youre full of shit, you should take a good look at yourself.
Also, its more of a defect of the godawfull language that is english that you use cute for attraction, instead of just cute puppies and rainbows.

ANOTHER thread where every fucking retard bites some cheap bait.

You're a sick fuck.

no, its not

Pedophilia is attraction to pre-pubescent children so no, putting the age of consent at 16 instead of 18 doesnt make you a pedophile.

i agree. we need to bring back arranged marriages that are blessed by morther church

Shocking.

Oh fuck off, you know the difference.
Anyone bitching about the age of consent is doing it because they have a vested interest.

How does it feel knowing that your rulers are banging all the cute teenage girls they want and laughing at you for actually believing their hysteria about it? How does it feel to be a cuck?

>>>/reddit/

There are plenty of socialists who are as well, and they're pretty tired of people like you.

The original poster said pedophile, I was speaking in to regard of that.

Are we being raided by >>>Holla Forums or something?

This reads like borderline comedy. Lenin and Marx would personally help us take care of pedos by any means necessary. Suck it up, buttercup.

He said that labling someone who is attracted to people under 18 as a pedophile is retarded. Because thats not what pedophilia is, nor is the age of someone a magical line at which they suddenly become attractive. Its a law protected to children. Theres 13 year olds looking more sexually mature than 19 year olds. The law is there to protect those 13 year olds, not because they are "less attractive" than the 19 year old I mentioned.

yeah and thats why we need our moral leadership in the church to guide us. we must have a strong moral shield agains tthe evils of this world.

This is why we can`t have unified left.

autism

Bullshit. Leftcoms have been here forever.

Not sure about Marx, but the age of consent in the Soviet Union was puberty, so Lenin definitely wouldn't. Not that I'd expect you to have more than a meme-tier understanding of history.

Yeah, just like drug laws are there to protect people, and gun control laws, and laws that say you can't film the police.

The whole point is that they aren't mentally developed enough yet the make those decisions for themselves.
Sure, magically overnight on their 18th birthday they don't magically change, but the point is that it is an acceptable standard wherein you understand what you are agreeing to, and the potential consequences of such.

Might take me a while, but give me a bit to skim my Lenin and come back with a quote.

Yea thats what I said.

Piss off cunt. Theres a difference between forbidding the mentally insane from buying guns and forbidding anyone from buying guns, just like theres a difference between forbidding or allowing people to fuck children.

but only recently have we gotten more autistic/shit leftcoms probably from reddit

(these are from /r/ultraleft btw)

My mistake comrade, I misunderstood your post.

It's a wholly manufactured standard created purely for the purpose of artificially inflating the value of aging, stank ass feminist pussy and it needs to be done away with.

So who gets to define who's mentally insane? Oh, right, your super-reliable and totally-not-totalitarian, totally-not-bought-and-paid-for "mental health professionals" who just so happen to render judgments in line with your politics.

...

This, we have always had leftcoms, but their numbers and turbo autism have never been like this until right around the end of 2016 or so. Then when the board went down for April it got magnitudes worse.

Would you blindly trust a 13 year old with a loaded gun?
Would you blindly trust every 13 year old with a loaded gun?
Do you really believe they fully comprehend the consequences of one?
I get the feeling I won't like your answer, but that's besides the point. Their brains are literally underdeveloped.
But there's a much smaller gap in processing, understanding information, and reacting to it from 18 - 25 then there is from 13 - 18.

...

Hating redditors is a hangover from 4chan and another attempt to divide the workers. Anyone can be retarded, it is not limited to reddit despite what people will have you think.

I know muh mental health is a spook, but talk to someone who is bipolar, talk to someone who is down syndrome, talk to someone who is schizophrenic, and tell me that they are always in control of themselves, and never make judgements that they normally wouldn't.
I used to know a schizophrenic who would break his TV almost every month because he believed it talked to him.

More than I'd trust half the posters on this board.

More than I'd trust half the posters on this board.

Point gun at thing, pull trigger, thing dies. Not hard to grasp. You don't even have to be 13 to understand that.

According to who? A community of "academics" who've repeatedly been shown to lie for political reasons and censor any evidence that goes against the politically-decided consensus? Interestingly, there's a study by Ernst et al. about the performance of healthy teens versus adults on the Iowa Gambling Task, a test of abstract reasoning. Turns out there's actually no difference, but even if there was, are you going to forbid an 18-year-old from being with a 40-year-old as well? Milestones are the key, and the milestone of being able to understand sex is reached quite a bit earlier than 18. Hence having sex ed at around puberty.

My brain was more developed than the average 25-year-old when I was 13. Most adults are stupid as fuck.

If that's true, why are so many older people stupid Trumpcucks or Hillshills and so many younger people so much smarter and more knowledgeable? Face it, this whole "they're not developed enough" shit is just another fake crisis engineered so authoritarians can grab for power.

It's true that anyone can be retarded, but Reddit is a site specifically designed to socially manipulate people into being retarded by shilling a false consensus full of retarded views. You can always tell a Redditor not only by their views, but by the way they respond to disagreement. Sadly, many of the posters on this board display traits consistent with Reddit, and it got especially bad with the catgirl drama. I wish we could send every poster we got from that back.

Hating redditors has always been a chan thing, not a cuckchan thing.
Reddit has always been a site made for liberals, by liberals. Hence why r/Socialism and r/FC stew in idpol. The conversations they have, the articles they read, the science they learn, is all first filtered through this lense.
As long as Reddit is run like this, it will always be like this.

I can tell you're a young American, even if you won't admit it. America has undergone a dramatic shift in perspective on leftism in the past couple of years. Communists were considered terrorists. People were called spies, thrown in jail, and fired for being IWW members, or merely attending a meeting of such and signing the guest roster.
This histeria then trickled down into schools, where right wing teachers would scream right wing rhetoric as if it were fact so not to be accused of being a Communist.

I don't believe for an instant that every scientist around the world conducting brain development studies lied for shits and giggles.

I guess the theory that Reddit's infiltrated the mod staff has been confirmed. Apparently getting rid of Redditors will also require ousting the current mods.

This isn't every scientist from around the world. It's only in America.

I think it's because idiots like you don't know when to sage so the mods won't have to bumplock.

Ever heard of the Rind study? Interesting how the American "research" community reacted to it - with censorship, because they couldn't refute anything in it.

What's that quote from that one show Reddit loves? Something about how if you tear out a man's tongue you're not proving him a liar, but showing the world that you fear what he might say?

It's called sample bias.

If you can find a peer reviewed, unbiased, reputable study backing your claims then I'd be more inclined to believe you.

Funny, sampling bias and insufficient sample size were exactly what the ephebophobic studies Rind was dissing were guilty of. That was one of his main contentions, seeing as Rind's meta-analysis of 59 studies had a total sample size of 36000, so the large sample size would reduce the likelihood of sampling bias affecting his results.

Quit being disingenuous. If it was just an issue of sampling bias, there would have been no need for the government to officially censure Rind. Sampling bias is something the academic community should theoretically be able to handle on its own.

A link you might be interested in:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

...

...

Wow, they sure are a reliable source. Rind actually issued a followup dealing with these objections, which was never responded to by the people who raised them, except of course in the form of threats.

I don't trust them to decide what those are.