Why are the Alt-right such hypocrites?

That's not why pol is all about "muh fun".

Again, the roots of sexual repression in order to build autocracy is deeper. Read Reich.

Probably because you are making the only subset of the alt right you interact with, imageboard dwellers, into the whole movement.
It's only imageboard users as a group that are so depraved. Sicko pride worldwide.

They're not just complaining about gay flaunting like at those pride parades. They whine and cry when marriage is legalized. Yet, they get off to yuri, yaoi, loli, shota, scat, bestiality, and other shit that is generally frowned upon in conservative circles.

I don't get why they're ok with gay sex in porn but the moment the lgbt are granted rights they throw temper tantrums.

Because liberal capitalism has penetrated everything, noone is safe, especially not the retards whose political beliefs are just a badly thought out reaction against feminist hambeasts like Anita. In general traditionalism is dead and modern "conservatives" are busy posting shitty frog memes on their social media accounts, Evola must be rolling in his grave
Also we have this thread every second week

...

Open sexuality and deviant perversions only create a society of vice and sin. And such a society is doomed to fail.

Also there's no reason to march around with 3 black dildos up your ass.

Because it advances gay culture? Gay culture is inherently open and flamboyant. Compare this to depictions in doujins. Yaoi and Yuri in fiction is portrayed far differently than real life.

Regardless, there's no reason for gay marriage. Such a marriage cannot bear a child and has no reason to exist as a result.

Because unless you go full Amish you can't escape how sexualised modern society is.

We're talking about a generation that's been streaming hardcore tranny porn since they were 12, you don't really graduate from that to "everything outside marital sex in the missionary position with the lights off is fun"

Sin is a fantasy concept for adults who have imaginary friends.

There is no such thing as gay "culture", unless you consider the flamboyant shows at the prides parades to be the epitome of gayness. You realize most gay people aren't like that, right? Maybe actually interact with gay people and realize they're normal, just like everyone else. Also, marriage isn't about children, otherwise infertile people and the childfree wouldn't be allowed to marry.

So that excuses the hypocrisy? :) If they truly believed that fun is a terrible thing, then they wouldn't partake in it or enjoy watching it.

The rates of alcoholism, mental illness, HIV, promiscuity, and drug addiction in the gay community tend to argue against "they're just people that like members of the same sex"

user it's really that simple, these people never matured beyond the age of 12.

They're cucked by spooks

Partly this:

Partly, they justify it because you are such hypocrites. It's like the middle east: you justify your hypocrisy by their hypocrisy, and they justify their hypocrisy by your hypocrisy. The only way to break the chain is to be better people yourselves.

Americans in general are insanely dysfunctional.

Because they're the ideology of "it's only bad when someone I doesn't like does it"

LEFTYPOL WATCH OUT

Even the Dutch, aka the height of Western liberal tolerance, have a gay community that is significantly more dysfunctional than heteros across most of the above mentioned factors.

Unfortunately you can't bring this up without the inevitable "Everything that makes the gay community look bad only happens because of homophobic persecution!" argument, as if San Francisco caused the AIDS crisis by its relentless evangelical fundamentalist atmosphere

Ancucks pls go

Was that pic supposed to be parody? Because it pretty much confirms the quote on the screen.

There's no hipocrisy in getting off to a prostitute. A women who is open about her sexuality is essentially a prostitute. This always existed in the most traditional and sexually repressed societies.

What happens is a re-shape of categorization. They're not getting off to free women, but using a proto-prostitute. Filmed Pornography is essentially filmed prostitution.

Therefore, no hipocrisy. At best, weakness and lack of Discipline in ranks.

The fact is, you don't give a shit about degenerates, but do give a shit about treating people equally. You can't say "these people never matured beyond the age of 12" without being a hypocrite.

makes people free.
are created by capitalism and sexuality turned into commodity.

No. Unless you want to. But it still doesn't do any good or bad. It's a byproduct of capitalism.

> there's no reason for gay marriage
I agree. Marriage is only a means to inherit private property.

North Europa. AKA everything wrong with socdem and capitalism.

kek'd

*woman

Rates of all of those things are more prominent among straight people. There are also multiple factors that go into why certain communities have these issues. I know, for a simpleton, nuance is scary and the "is cuz they're gay!" is an easy answer, but there really is more factors into this.

I understand that's the mentality, I just don't get how they rationalize it. I mean, I know people in general are hypocritical, I'm just fascinated by alt-right hypocrisy in this instance because I've come across it numerous times.

I used to be part of a discord server ran by one of these alt-right morons. The server was for alternative hentai, like guro, loli, inflation, scat, watersports, all sorts of weird shit. Yet, the guy went on and on about how much he hated niggers and faggots and wanted the white race to reign supreme. I left it eventually, and come to find out later the guy who runs it actually gets off to real child porn.

I don't see how acknowledging someone hasn't matured makes someone a hypocrite.

1. there is no such thing as the alt-right
2. moralfags are not the same as ironic fascists like the ones you see on Holla Forums

Of course there is.

youtube.com/watch?v=Cp0uq-QafYQ

...

no, there actually isn't

there is no manifesto of the """alt-right""", there is no collective identity besides 'fuck liberals'

civic nationalists, moderate conservatives, libertarians, far-rightists, neo-fascists, or classical liberals could all be branded "alt-right".

if you believe that, then you're telling me that basically anyone who isn't a hardcore idpol or socialist is "alt-right".

Literally google "gay community" and any of the illnesses I mentioned and you'll find multiple articles belating how disproportionately the gay community suffers from alcoholism, mental illness, etc. I honestly want to see where you're getting your statistics on, because it seems to go against practically every study done on those illnesses prevalence in the gay community

aka "It has to be any other reason except their homosexuality! I most certainly am not going to reconsider my default assumption that there's nothing inherently different about homosexuality outside sexual attraction, I'm just going to find ever-more unfalsifiable excuses for why it's not actually associated with homosexuality"

What is wrong with you comrade?

Just like SJW is a term to describe the radical leftists, alt-right is a term used to describe the radical right. There is no SJW manifesto either, but most people know what you're talking about when you use the term. Alt-right is just the right's version of SJW.

"I really want to hate the gays and not see them as people, because that would require I actually have empathy for people who aren't exactly like me. It's also easier to just blame everything on the sexuality rather than other factors."

You don't see a problem here?

Not really.

This one is more accurate.

But SJW aren't really top left. They don't care about capitalism.

Why do you assume I hate homosexuals?

If I want schizophrenics to be treated for schizophrenia, does that mean I hate schizophrenics?

I know it must be hard for you to envision anyone critical of homosexuality that isn't a raging Christfag that thinks "God says it bad, and thus fags deserve to go to hell" is the start and end of any debate on it, but at least attempt to try it

From what I've seen they rag on and on about how oppressive capitalism is. They just claim it's a white cis male thing and make it about racism, sexism, and other isms.

Homosexuality isn't an illness. It hasn't been in the DSM since the 70s. Again, I know it's easier to blame it all on the gays but you could try being empathetic.

Hi Volodymyr!

They are not ironicly…

SJWs wouldn't last a day without capitalism and daddy's money.

Shit wrong post, this was meant for>>1754428

Because not enough brown women are in the boardroom. They're crypto-neoliberals with trappings.

Some of them argue for that, yes. Others argue for the complete abolition of capitalism.

Homosexuals themselves admit that the removal of homosexuality from the DSM was the end result of a co-ordinated campaign of political pressure, and not the dispassionate application of psychological theory, and a resulting lack of evidence over the potential pathology of homosexuality

thehomoculture.com/2016/09/19/32707/

>Some groups seeking greater understanding and acceptance of sexual diversity have lobbied for changes to the legal and medical status of unusual sexual interests and practices. Charles Allen Moser, a physician and advocate for sexual minorities, has argued that the diagnoses should be eliminated from diagnostic manuals.[13]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilia#Terminology

Hmmm…I thought SCIENCE! was supposed to be immune to lobbying and other political pressure?

So being leftist isn't what unites them, but you're going to call all radical leftists SJW?

I'm "socked"

Go back.

No no it was classified as mental illness because of politics so politics is what reversed it.

It's similar to how most economists in a capitalist nation will just happen to favor capitalism across the board.

"I don't like acknowledging facts because I want to remain being non-empathetic to a minority group of people who have done nothing wrong to hurt me.

I'm ignoring basic biology, psychology, and neurology because I can't past my own biases."

IMAGINE MY SURPRISE

IT IS FOR THE BEST THAT SOME THINGS CANNOT BE IMAGINED

People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

You forgot your ancap flag.

The multiple pathologies associated with homosexual demonstrates that even if it was politics that got it on the DSM, it probably should have stayed there

independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/drug-use-seven-times-higher-among-gays-8165971.html

nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/report-lesbian-gay-bi-adults-face-higher-substance-abuse-rates-n671876?cid=sm_tw

web.archive.org/web/20150209213637/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/surveillance/incidence/

I would go on, but the longer I post this stuff the higher the chance I'll piss off some gay mod here for "irrelevant shiting"

That 18 year old should not be on the sex offenders list. I think the sex offenders list should be abolished.

Also yes, the alt-right are hypocrites for getting off to degenerate porn while crying about people they themselves deem degenerate.

"I still continue to ignore other factors that may contribute into why these groups might have these issues. Naw, it has to be the gay."

Are you a closet homosexual?

I think you're trying to say that correlation is causation when it adds weight to your argument.

Fujos get out.

Fujos are bad when they ship. That show was actually about fags iirc.

What is it with you people and this "everyone who disagrees with ameriburger taboos is an ancap" bit? It's both fascinating and revolting at the same time.

How much more evidence is required?

Evidence that won't, of course, get shrugged off by posters like with "it's obviously homopbia that caused it", as if England of all fucking places is overwhelming homophobic

But I thought England was full of gay hating muslims?

Are you a closet homosexual? :) It's ok to be gay. I know years of internalizing homophobia is hard to overcome, but with the right psychologist and support system, you can overcome it.

...

I somehow doubt gay Muslims are a significant proportion of the people questioned

You can do better than that, user

This is a work safe board please put spoilers over explicitly erotic pictures please and thank you.

Abhorring explicit, subjective violence, while ignoring or out-right excusing the continuously sustained objective violence needed to maintain the perception of peace within a system shambling in a perpetual state of undead-like collapse, grinding the poor under it with each lurch forward.
Let alone the instances of outright violent suppression of nations who attempt anything that even remotely smells like anti-capitalist policy, even shit like new-deal style Keynesianism.

Liberals will tolerate anything if you tell them it's to preserve the status-quo first.

It's just not very convincing, your argument. The study may say 40% of gays do illegal drugs but then I'm thinking 'well what about the 60% who don't do drugs?' I just don't buy that you have to liquedate (or whatever extreme solution you prefer) an entire demographic because of the (possibly explainable) high rate of foolishness.

That'd be like me saying we should nuke america to fight obesity.

Fuck their memes. Memes are the death of political discussion anyway, and they're clearly demonstrating that they can only think in thought-terminating cliches like "you can't be allowed to control your own body because your age is less than an arbitrary number we pulled right out of our asses based on absolutely no credible scientific evidence". These people are every bit as bad as the Soviet homophobes and I want them well the fuck away from a position of power in any socialist movement. They'd create a society every bit as unjust as anything that exists now because they refuse to abandon their need to create an outgroup to otherize, and they refuse to critically examine the social mores they've beed fed. They're not capable of logical reasoning and their leadership would only bring socialism to ruin. I'm not interested in living under fucking IngSoc and if joining with ancaps is the only way to prevent that, it might be worth considering, because there's at least a chance they won't turn into raging social conservative tankie faggots (never mind that the USSR set the age of consent at puberty, because tankie LARPers don't read books). It's something a lot of people who may otherwise become socialists are considering because they don't want this fucking Americancer in their countries.

It's because he has a bias against homosexuals, and rather than recognize this bias he grabs hold of it and won't let go. I've seen this several times in closet homosexuals, which is why I asked him if he's closeted.

Forgot your ancap flag.

I see it all the time in closeted ephebosexuals (aka normal people).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_formation

American sexual hysteria is quite interesting from a scientific perspective. We need to study the psychological roots of their deep-seated need to control teenagers' sexuality so we can figure out the best way to apply a cure to them. Just kidding, the only cure for ephebophobes is a 9mm anti-puritanism pill directly to the back of the head.

Back to Reddit.

They've got an ancap sub, you might like it.

Do you have a single argument to refute any of that or are you just going to keep posting memes?

When did that happen?

Tankies are psudo-leftists who arbitrarily picked a different flavor a fascism from Hitlerism. Don't let them bother you too much. We'll find a way to purge them in any real revolution.

I feel like a lot of these armchair-fascists you see on the internet just haven't thought through their ideology. Do they really want to go searching for and lining up 'degenerates' and non-whites and eliminating them? Not that I'm willing to rule out that may have the right solution in mind.

Why would I want to go there? Questioning ephebophobia is banned on Reddit. It's the perfect place for people like you who can't make a real argument, because you can just scream to the mods and ban any opinion you don't like so your meme circlejerk will be safe.

Forgot your ancap flags.

They don't. It's a religion, it doesn't have to make any sense.

If you keep this shit up we're going to make Stalin look like a fucking anarchist when we come after you.

maybe it's because homosexuality doesn't exist other than as identity for wannabe victims to latch onto, and no one actually cares if you jerk off to trap porn as long as you don't turn it into a civil rights issue

The fact that across all the metrics previously mentioned homosexuals perform significantly worse than heterosexuals indicates that maybe there's something there beyond the default assumption that "we're literally exactly the same, they just like dicks instead of pussies"

Also, following that logic it would be stupid to monitor depressed individuals for suicide prevention because "only X% of depressed individuals actually kill themselves"

Again, who promised liquidation? It says a lot that members of this board simply can't countenance any association between homosexuality and mental pathology without automatically assuming the person making this connection wants to throw them off buildings for the greater glory of Allah or whatever.

pandys.org/articles/lesbiandomesticviolence.html

You're already making your self look like an anarchist. An anarcho-capitalist.

And you're already making yourself look like a Redditor. Between those two choices I'd rather look like an ancap.

Dude, just come out of the closet. It's ok.

I knew that, I've been telling you to remember your flag the whole time.

Repeating your argument is not going to suddenly make it a different argument. I fully understood your reasoning before.

Actually the logic of your example would follow that we should increase education on stds and the risks of illicit drug use if it adversely effects the homosexual population. Of course that is without doing any examining of why individual homosexuals tend to be effected by these problems.

Very disingenuous. By arguing that homosexuality should be classified as an 'illness' you are implicitly arguing that it should be 'treated' in same way.

Guess most of the American socialist movement is just Democrats, then. Yet another reason to exclude American socialists from everything.

Where's your feminist flag, by the way? You're doing an excellent job of imitating their lack of logic.

Except given that gay men still represent ~80% of new HIV infections I doubt there's much anyone can do to save them from themselves. I mean this is a community that lived through the horrors of AIDS, and still engages in sexually-reckless behavour like bingeing on meth and fucking all weekend

vice.com/sv/article/watch-the-trailer-for-our-new-film-chemsex-422

Expecting homosexuals to police their behaviour is like expecting a schizophrenic to supervise his own treatment - if anything advances in HIV prevention/treatment have just enabled homosexuals to double-down on the sexual recklessness, "because if I just take PrEP the morning after it's not really a problem!"

I want more research into addressing the root causes, given that it seems that environmental causes (i.e. molestation, etc) are disproportionately responsible

link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-008-9386-1

Ancap flag.

thats the only hypocrisy about them that bothers you?!

Bullshit. Tanks are top left are are very different from SJWs.

It's one that I notice a lot more since I'm a weirdo who gets off to degenerate porn.

I always wondered what a broken record sounds like.

youtube.com/watch?v=UePtoxDhJSw

The fact that most homosexuals live happy and fulfilling lives doesn't even factor into his world view. Even if all these issues were because they're icky poo poo gays, the fact of the matter is that this is still the minority of the lgbt community.

I'm going to try to guess what this is without watching it because I don't want to catch the retard disease that's infected you. Is this that one Reddit video where they falsely equate ephebosexuality with pedophilia?

Le mad ancap is man.

Why do liberals get so seething mad over right-wing hypocrisy but are completely oblivious to their own?

...

Your argument is still the same as is my response. Your data is enough for you because it benefits your argument. But you're only looking at one set of data to explain HIV rates. That's not enough to convince me of the implicit illness of homsexuality.

Well I know quite a few homosexuals and not one of them has ever mentioned having been molested. Maybe these cherry picked stats mostly come from the gays that frequent gay bars and other seedy city hangouts that druggies and the sexually promiscuous tend to frequent across the board.

Now you may say that's anecdotal but I say that that's a descrepancy which I feel isn't examined enough.

Here's another idea:
Did you know that 40% of homeless youth identify as lgbt? Did you know that 70% of that number say that their former homes not accepting their sexuality is the reason for their homelessness? Now what are the rates of drug use and stds among the homeless or formerly homeless?

Just the quality of argumentation I've come to expect from someone who has to fall back to the "u mad" defense. Holla Forums isn't wrong because they're angry, they're wrong because their beliefs are retarded. But seriously, some things actually justify anger, like corporate exploitation, needless war or social conservative tyranny. Your inability to attract the teens you're desperately trying to convince yourself you don't want isn't one of them.

I'm not mad, I was curious about this instance of hypocrisy

Stop it with your nuance and looking into other factors. Clearly gay is icky, clearly.
.

Ancap flag.

Well I'm not the "pour over statistics" kind of guy. So I'm trying to just give him my very non-expert (which he obviously is as well) reasoning why his arguments fall flat for me.

Unfortunate that his own reasoning seems very shallow despite how many chances I give him to better explain it.

If you didn't care enough to proofread your bigoted shrieking, you didn't care enough to put any thought into whether or not it's justified.

Stay mad rhymes with ancap flag.

And you're simply doing the reverse and using excessive standards of proof to find any excuse to dismiss data that doesn't meet your expectations

As mentioned above, LGBT seems to be comorbid with a number of negative socioeconomic metrics, so it's not that surprising that individuals from a community with disproportionate incidences of mental illness, alcoholism, drug abuse etc would also struggle with gaining and staying in adequate housing.

To use your absurd standards of proof, we're only getting one side of the story - for all we know they were kicked out for other reasons, but thought they'd get more sympathy from researchers if they just claimed that they were kicked out for being gay.

And what's the correlation between homelessness and mental illness?

How much further evidence is required? You yourself admit that gays seem disproportionately represented among the homeless (who themselves are notorious for disproportionate prevalence of serious mental illness), to make the argument that what? Getting kicked out by their homophobic parents causes them to engage in reckless and self-destructive behaviour?

Not with Nazis/fascists.

The other major neo-Nazi/neo-fascist faction from the Holla Forums and T_D keyboard warriors is literal drug trafficking gangs that started in American prisons.

The Aryan Brotherhood is a drug cartel with a coat of racist paint.

It's a possible factor. I'm not entirely sure why you're opposed to the idea that other factors could contribute to the high number of issues within the lgbt community. Your bias is showing.

Are you a closeted homosexual?

Because this rests on the assumption that they were kicked out purely due to their parents homophobia, and since we only have the gay participants' side of the story how can we be sure they aren't lying?

Any gay person with two cells to rub together and a lack of integrity would choose "My parents kicked me out because they're homophobes" to researchers investigating LGBT homelessness, not "My parents kicked me out because I was stealing from them" or other mundane reasons.

Well of course I must be, in the same sense that racists are just closeted blacks and anti-semites are just closeted jews

Well at least you, unintentionally, admitted that you're just a bigot. You don't care about the facts if they don't fit your bias.

Are you a closeted gay? Were you brought up in a bigoted household? Were you bullied by gay kids? Did a former girlfriend leave you for another woman?

Fuck off retard, stay spooked

You can whine about my "wanting more research because I'm not a brainlet who cherry picks data to suit his argument" until your fingers go numb. Your argument is shallow.
kek that's a good point. Evangelicals have every reason to manipulate data to their own ends and have been known to distribute disinformation in their own anti-gay propaganda.

Wow I have absurd standards of 'proof' (correlation is not causation) but you're willing to jump to the conclusion that they're disproportionately lying for sympathy? This is a horrid lack of empathy.

Or that being homeless has this effect. Many homeless people have to sell their bodies for rent or food and prostitution is an easy way for people to get stds or involved with drugs.

Reminder that reactionarism is a pathology, and that includes the authoritarianism and conservative social policies of Stalin and his heirs.

It was already assumed that I was a bigot from the moment I questioned that maybe homosexuals aren't exactly like heterosexuals save for sexual preference

Do you have any argument that's not an ad hominem?

Did that study contact the parents of the homeless LGBT individuals mentioned? Or did the researchers simply take the homeless LGBT individuals at their word?

…except the studies cited were committed by, or on behalf of, LGBT organisations, so I doubt there's a conspiracy of undercover evangelical social science researchers out to distort "the real picture" of homosexual life.

What's the difference? You want to claim that evidence I cited is probably because bigoted social science researchers targeted the most broken LGBT individuals to prove some sort of homophobic argument.

All you can do is ineffectually whine "your arguments are shallow", without citing a single study to prove me wrong. There's no further point in arguing with someone that can't even bother marshaling countervailing evidence, and thinks that grand conspiracies of evangical fundamentalist social science researchers are distorting data on the LGBT community

Nice tinfoiling brah, it's like I'm on Holla Forums

Also lmao that the excessive involvement of out-and-proud homosexuals in the far-Right never gets any sort of comment from the Left outside weird psychoanalytical mumbo-jumbo

You have an interesting (and wrong) definition of rhyme, much like your definitions of rape and pedophilia. But I've got more important shit to do than sit around and yak at your stupid ass. All you do when you ignore repeated requests to produce evidence, reasoning or anything other than memes to support your position is convert people to our side, so by all means.

Just love the random gay porn in the thread. Never change Holla Forums never change

i know who the fuck those two are and I feel ashamed to know it

Typical libtard, make a statement with no instances or substantial examples to back it up.

ITT: Social science researchers that study the gay community on behalf of LGBT organisations are actually part of a sinister evangelical conspiracy to promote homophobic attitudes in the wider population

Never change Holla Forums

...

It's okay mate, these faggots (literal or otherwise) can't argue for shit.

The image that I started the thread with is from an alt-right artist who mainly draws lolicon and watersports, yet he yammers on and on about how much he hates socialism and worships Nazi Germany. He's even stated that people who cannot contribute (e.g. disabled people) should be put to death.

I also stated earlier how I was a part of a discord server ran by an alt-right moron who, come to find out later, actually got off to real child porn (and not loli or shota.)

Problem? C:

Imagine being this mad that people don't blindly accept your rational for hating gays.

Because not accepting weak arguments and asking him to actually think about why things happen instead of assuming, means we can't argue. ok

90% of all channers suffer from depression, social anxiety or both.

...

"Hi I'm going to keep shoving the false premise that homosexuality, in and of itself, is an illness and ignore any factors otherwise that might explain why they have these issues"

>the counter-'''argument''''' that /leftysafespace/ provides is that research by LGBT organisations is part of a big conspiracy

commit suicide

"Hi I'm going to find any excuse possible for why homosexuality - despite being co-morbid with as many signs of social dysfunction as your typical mental illness - really isn't at all a sign of mental illness or pathology. I mean if I was a straight man I'd probably still get fucked off my face on meth and fuck one hundred women in a heterosexual bathhouse (heteros have bathhouses, right?)"

Cry harder closet cases.

I simply made an unrelated point about evangelicals since you brought them up to strawman my stance. Didn't mean to trigger you, m8. My original argument is still the exact same considering your argument has never hanged beyond the initial stats you used to validate it.

Actually the implcation was that they would have accidentally targeted a concentration of damaged gays. Again, you started us on conspiratorial talk. This was also specifically in reference to your assertion that homosexuality is caused by molestation. So you're having a hard time keeping up with the conversation.
I assume because you're getting emotional.

Yes, seems like you're getting pretty emotional.

A full mental breakdown even.

Why are you bringing this up out of nowhere? You mean like Milo? He's the exact kind of damaged slutty gay that makes all other gays look bad. Or are you yourself one of the "proud far-right gays"? I'm just trying to grasp why you would bring this up out of nowhere…

Nice liberal meme, pozzlord.

...

...

No, but if you have this much of a rage boner against THE GAYS then chances are you're a closeted homosexual.

It's ironic because the alt-right love (or loved) Milo yet his behavior is the type of degenerate shit they whine and claim all homosexuals engage in.

Still not an argument.

Sorry that you're mentally ill, then.

I'm also sorry that Uncle Bobby molested you as a child.

At least I got laid.

Sodomy 👏 doesn't 👏 create 👏 life.

Stop believing in fairy tales.

...

Milo did nothing wrong. Well, except for advocating for Trump and working for Breitbart. What he said about the age of consent was actually pretty mild compared to the truth, but even mild questioning triggers certain people. They simply can't tolerate any dissent because they're too arrogant to admit that their witch hunt has done much more harm than good, and if dissent was allowed they might be forced to admit that they ruined a lot of lives for nothing. Since their virtue signaling has deluded them into a false sense of moral superiority, that would destroy them psychologically and socially because it would force them to admit that they're fucking evil people who habitually do fucking evil things.

The only bad things there are the Pokemon picture and the BLUMPF! book that he didn't even write.

Kill yourselves cucks

a
n
c
a
p
f
l
a
g