According to Stern, Stone asks Putin if he’d take a shower in a submarine with a gay man

“Well, I prefer not to go to shower with him,” Putin explains, according to The Daily Beast. “Why provoke him? But you know, I’m a judo master and a SAMBO master as well.”

yahoo.com/news/putin-most-putin-response-whether-185727171.html

Besides the god spook, is Putin /our capitalist/? He routinely blows out idpolfags and triggers Western babbies. He defends man + woman relationships because they actually help society and the workers, unlike fags and trannies who just want their feels. Thoughts?

>>>Holla Forums

yeah totally our guy

Holla Forums truly cant esape the idpol. Your precious hetero identity does not mater in anyw way

Not repressing, but not making them a huge factor in a healthy society. They can diddle in their rooms, fuccboi.


lmao imagine being this edgy

Yes forcing people to deny themselves raises the birthrate, what we need in our society is more prejustice and self hate!

...

Spooked as fuck.

despook yourself imbecile

That's in Chechnya, boy. That has nothing to do with Pootine.

Nobody is telling anyone to deny themselves, fag. It's simply a matter of not letting fags run wild.

It's part of your Putin pushing quote.

“Gay propaganda” and pride parades should absolutely be banned. Not counting Chechnya, homosexuals are not repressed in any way in Russia.

I don't think that's true, user.

I used to like and admire Oliver Stone as one of the only vocal celebrity critics of US imperialist designs.

But this is fucking ridiculous. Stone was absolutely infatuated with Putin and it seems like he actually thinks he's a "good guy" now.

...

i told you this is what happens when you make a big deal out of criticizing ess jay doubleyoos

i told you dog

nah

Putin is even more stupid than I thought.

gays need to do their part for society.

In what ways could a society in which gays are a "huge factor" (?) be described as unhealthy?

Kadyrov is an Islamic fundamentalist, it's his own idea. There's no way Putin asked him to imprison gays.


It is true, if you don't kiss in public or try to have a pride parade, nobody is going to object to what you do in private or if you go to gay bars. Yes, there are gay bars and gay saunas in Russia.

1. less chilluns
2. more disease
3. feelz
4. might get poked in the shower

Come on now.

Tell us again how you're "against idpol". :^)

Only if we ban all hetero sexual expression in public too. So no kissing and hand holding!

It's not okay for heteros to kiss in public either


Idk, user

You're right, public affection a shit. On the other hand, a man and a woman holding hands is not the same as gays walking each other on leashes in panties.

that right there is just poor parenting

that's how most fags raise their kids tho

this

How is this a bad thing? In fact, in our current context of global overpopulation, how is it not a good thing?


Not if you have proper sex ed and easy access to condoms — and both tend to fare poorly under conservative governments.


You really can't think of anything, do you?


I wouldn't be surprised if this was actually the main reason motivating your opposition to gay rights.

Alright, I can understand if it's for both types of couples. Though, why would you want to do that?

This is what happens when you let Holla Forumstards in all in the name of "combating SJWs" or whatever.

t. handholdless virgins

Gay men should go back to sham marriages and having kids while being fags on the weekends. Gay men refusing to reproduce is having catastrophic society wide dysgenic effects. Turning faggots into life long degenerate hedonists is the greatest Jewish trick of our time.

t. exhibitionist

kek as long a it's equal then

I can't stand seeing people all over eachother in public


Not a virgin. People don't like seeing that shit in public

Read a book, nigger. And even if it is the case, you have to have children to continue the next generation. You're dumb as fuck if you think being pro-life means 6-7 children per family.


Sex ed and condoms turn sex into something which it isn't. I can see how this fits in well with your gay ideology.


It's a fact that gays base their life around dick, have you ever looked at stats comparing them to heteros?


That's funny, I could say you want gay rights because you want dick. The last one was obviously a joke, but your response leads me to believe that you're actually a homo because you seem quite triggered.

Just stop with your ideological nonsense. Gays have always been outcasts in any sane and healthy society. The best they can hope for is to be treated fairly and stick to private gatherings. The LGBTQWERTY crowd has got to go. They serve no benefit to the revolution whatsoever, and go hand-in-hand with neoliberalism.

Well, kissing is one step from fucking. Once as a kid I was riding a bus (90 minute ride) with my older brother. There was a couple sitting behind us and they were very noisy, brother told me to not look back. Maybe they were fucking, don't really know, didn't look. And they were going at it the whole ride. Disgusting. If I had a kid, I wouldn't want him to be in the same position as me. Anyone making out in public should have shit beaten out of them.


Stop projecting

The welfare system will collapse spectacularly unless people start having kids.

Too bad that countries contributing to the overpopulation the most are not the ones where faggotry is widely accepted.

You're fucking retarded. You are absolutely and totally fucking retarded.

Typical brainlets. People don't have kids because it is not economically viable.

This.
How often have you looked at a gay pride parade and thought
Is the answer 'never'?

KILL YOURSELVES

FUCKING KILL YOURSELVES, EVERY LAST ONE OF YOU WORTHLESS SHITHEELS WHO THINKS THAT A DEMOGRAPHIC THAT CONSTITUTES LESS THAN 5% OF THE POPULATION IS RUINING MARRIAGE AND FAMILIES FOR EVERYONE ELSE

YOU ARE IRREDEEMABLY STUPID

the guy on the right looks like he's covered in a Ukranian flag
amusing

It's bullshit. There is no correlation between progressive views on gays/sex/other-left idpol, and decreased birthrates. Decreased birthrates are entirely a reaction to material conditions.
Plus, if religious people care so much about making babies and upholding values, go ahead, have ten of them and raise them Catholics or whatever. But if you want to regulate other people's behavior, I'll need better evidence of (societal) harm than the same two pictures (>>1746707 ) over and over again, or Holla Forumsyp infographs.

I never implied such thing
The fags don't have kids because they're too busy fucking the wrong hole in the wrong person, obviously.

So it's not economically viable in the richest countries but it's viable in poor shitholes?

It's not, but the ideology that promotes such people is.

Hmm why should such a tiny portion of the population be allowed to hold pride Marchs and dominate the political discourse so much then?

HMmmMmM why do leftists care about trannies so much they're practically a non existent demographic


Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

And that would be…?

But you and op are the ones talking about them.

B-but reddit told me it couldn't possibly be because the left has been co-opted by i-idpol!!

commodity

This thread is the best proof supporting why we should ban Holla Forumstards and their ilk on sight. These people are intellectual embarrassment who add absolutely nothing of value to the general conversation and invariably derail debates with inane shitposting, edgy contrarianism and worthless memes.

This post is proof leftists are modern day puritans and zealots uncritically regurgitating whatever their kike neolib masters tell them to think and LITERALLY need thought police to stamp out crime think.

Faggot here, pride marches are the most retarded thing ever, not only does it put way to much focus on "gay rights", it is also directly hostile to the part gay population that are trying to be somewhat normal. I don't know what damage hand-holding can do tbh.

You're a complete retard who has never read the tiniest bit of socialist theory and clearly does not understand what "commodity" even means.

I don't know,NotSoc, why would people dedicated to the unification of the working class not encourage disunity in the working class? Doesn't make sense.

half this board is gross fags, fuck off snowflake

I never said this, you drooling retard.

...

russki here kissing is already mostly tabu
not that your point isn't stupid. cry more fagboi.

I asked you what you believed "sex ed and condoms" turned sex into that it shouldn't. You responded with "commodity". It's not my fault if your mental capacity does not allow you to post more than a few words at a time you braindead mong.

god that response was so dumb.

God damn you're fucking stupid
You can't make someone fucking gay or trans by "promoting" it
It doesn't fucking work like that, fuckstick

First off, you ass, Freedom of Assembly. Second, Pride Marches are usually dumb and counterproductive, but being dumb and counterproductive is not against any law or statute, nor should it be as long as it constitutes no harm to other people.


No one actually fucking cares about trannies, shithead. They have one side threatening to hurt them constantly and the other side encouraging them to commit self-harm and shining them on in order to seem as "progressive" as possible to the rest of their idpol-loving voterbase. Neither side actually gives a fuck about the trannies themselves.

It's your fault that you immediately think that not worshiping condoms and sex ed must mean I'm some sort of pseudo-conservative. It shows that you're a brainlet infested with ideology. I'm not going to spend the time educating you about sexual experience, you can figure that out on your own since you're a titan of theory.

You absolutely can, just how porn influences fetishes and makes certain desires form.

if we ever hope to replicate the conditions that led to the most glorious european civilizations (ancient greece and rome) we need to push with all our strengh towards homosexuality

man, sometimes i think this place is pretty cool and has a lot for me to learn from and then there's discussion on gay people or trans people and whoops nevermind this place is awful
i guess it's to be expected from an imageboard but goddamn

gay people are great, they make for good porn and conversation

Understand it's a very vocal minority.

Most people here are strongly in favor of LGBT rights.

Being gay or trans aren't fucking fetishes you can develop, you utter mongoloid. You can't make a man be attracted to men unless he was already at least incidentally homosexual in the first place. Being trans is a dysmorphic disorder brought on by a gigantic screwup in brain development in utero, wherein the brain of a trans person LITERALLY DOES NOT MATCH THEIR BODY. There are retard "transtrenders" all over Tumblr, but they're not fucking trans, they're RETARDS who have found something they think is hip and trendy (usually because some other braindead Tumblrite convinced them of it).

You cannot make someone trans or gay if they were not already. Anyone who suddenly "becomes" either of those things is either a retard or has been in the closet about it for a while. The retards are STILL a small minority of people, the real gay/trans people are an even SMALLER minority, and the fact of the matter is that the straight people have been fucking up their own shit with NO help from the gay/trans people for a LONG GODDAMN TIME NOW.

Quit pointing fingers at the gay/trans communities for YOUR OWN GODDAMN FAILURES, you worthless sacks of shit.

Woah, that's a lot of words there — don't push yourself too hard. Anyway, you didn't actually answer my question. You unambiguously claimed "sex ed and condoms" turned sex into a commodity, but won't answer to any inquiry on why that would be the case or even what you believe a commodity even is in the first place. It sounds to me like you're just a complete idiot who talks out of his ass. Every second of your presence around here contributes to slowly turning Holla Forums into an irredeemable cesspit of mediocrity and imbecility. It would render us an immense favor if you'd consider suicide as an option. Thanks!

Well, this board is 50% homos, so I can't really blame you for your objection. As for your inability to contemplate my statements, I feel bad for you son. Enjoy your next dicking, friend. Just know that the gulag will be waiting for you around the corner.

user, how did you come to be this retarded? you don't even know what a commodity is. why don't you just go back to Holla Forums?

Wow yeah capitalism with right-wing idpol is the way to go if we want to stop capitalism and idpol, I agree OP!

Well they do have negative birth rates, and that’s a big problem for Russia.

Most gays don’t raise children like that.

Wow, you sure got me there.

"So it's not economically viable in the richest countries but it's viable in poor shitholes?”

The cost of raising children is much more expensive when compared to an average income in the first world than in the third world.

no really though. how did it get to be this bad? did you just decide you like the color red one day and switched from reactionary capitalist to reactionary capitalist with hammer and sickle? at least know something about communism if your going to post you drivel here.

Gay marriage would be fine. But most gays refuse to adopt in order to raise children (the point of marriage).

Not to mention that in third world shitholes, kids increase the household income with their work…

Actually user, homosexuality is caused by environmental conditions and is most likely not a result of genetics. So is gender dysphoria.

most studies conclude it's a combination of the two

Homosexuality is caused by older men raping prepubescent boys. The gay scene in SF and NYC was very open about this practice well into the late 70s.

Proof?

Environmental conditions can have permanent effects on physiology my dude. Is it cool with you to mistreat cripples who lost a limb to environmental effect instead of congenital deformity?

Are you trying to tell us you were raped, user

The only occupation in the first world where it’s econmicly viable to have three or more children and not be rich is farming.

I think it depends on the family and whether the parents treat and raise their children as actual children and not as pets

No, they would look for confused adolescent boys who they thought were gay and try to help them accept it. There are obvious problems with that but you're overstating it.

Why is faggotry some integral part of western leftism?

It isn’t. It’s an integral part of western liberalism. Which people in the west confuse with leftism.

why are the majority of pedophiles gay men then???

Shut up, retard.
The fact that this has 80 replies is astounding. How much of it is OP doing damage control?

I wonder who the real faggot is. Hmmm

really makes ya noggin joggin, huh

Dude, just answer my question:

1. What is a commodity?
2. Why should unreproductive sexual relation be considered commodities?

calling stuff spooks, is a spook in of itself.

No it isn't.

Being a spook is what makes something a spook.

Aren't most women though?

a true leftist hero!

...

Actually I saw a report that said most gay pedophiles are not attracted to adult men and don't identify as gay.

Why is she so cute

Because she's not real.

kill yourself shill.