Is Israel possibly Britain's most hilarious mistake?

Is Israel possibly Britain's most hilarious mistake?

nah that would be america

No the Jewish people needed a state. Many early communist leaders were Jewish. We owe them a debt of gratitude.

Actually this was

Resulted in decades of unnecessary warfare

What doesn't exist can't have a state.

First of all, the only thing the Jews need are a nuclear holocaust,

jewish communists were always anti-zionist, retard

...

hi pol

Yes so funny.

...

Really makes you think

...

The holocaust was a JOKE white boy

Did someone say NAZBOL?

Sup Holla Forums. Stop relying on shitty jpegs and open a book for once in your life.

If not: Kill yourself you zionist stooge

Judaism is a religion.
Israel is supposed to be a nation-state.
If it is to exist it has to exist independed of relgion.
The only actual reason it was created, was for Burger-UK to have control over the oil in middle east.

The only debt we "owe" to the Israelites is to help them figure out their borders and create a secular state.

Jews in the UK lobbyed and even committed terrorism for Israel's creation.

RIGHTFUL
ARAB
CLAY

...

not in its current form

...

The occupied 6 counties of East Ireland AKA 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧Israel🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 need to be reclaimed in the name of the 38 county Irish Socialist Republic.

fucking jews and their damn debts

Well, except Einstein

...

...

this but unironically

Anonymous image boards were a mistake.

idk how much blame Britain deserves. There were Jews in the British government that probably pushed for Israel's formation but Britain generally was not exactly sympathetic to the Zionist cause after the likes of Irgun and Lehi had spent the better part of a decade terrorising the Mandate. It's America that mostly supplied the Jews in Palestine, iirc.

Of course it's also worth remembering that Israel may have lost the Yom Kippur War if not for America's intervention. It's always the yanks who are to blame.

Israel is a great diversion for mudslime attacks.

Sure we get a lot in Europe but Israel gets them daily.
Muslims are angry at non muslims simply for existing. If it wasnt for Israel we would be the primary target of muslim rage.

No, pal, muslims are only angry at the west due to imperialism…
Expect at the VERY LEAST some 50 plus years of terrorist attacks, not that it matters, they are severely sensationalized by the media.
Compare the amount of deaths by fierarm in the US against the amount of deaths by terrorism… they won't number up to 10% of the first.

You're actually completely wrong. Israel doesn't get attacked daily and beyond that they fucking should be. I'd be attacking the people who made me a refugee too if I were the Palestinians. On top of this most of the terrorist attacks carried out against Israel throughout the 20th century were carried out by comrades like the PFLP.

Churchill was just mad that Roosevelt liked Stalin better than him.

lmaoo

How the hell is the Ottoman Empire the wests fault?

Do you mean, "How was the destruction of the Ottomon Empire the West's fault?" See, there was this Great War…

Hi Holla Forums

The question would be what possessed to Ottomans to involve themselves in WW1? And why join the German side rather than the allies?

The answer is of course expansionism and greed by the Ottoman empire. Protip the Ottoman empire is not ''the west'

forgot to take my shitposting flag off.

One of the guys who stabbed people in London used to get mad and shout at women for riding bikes in public.

Russia was allied with France and was expected to join the war in support of France. Russia and the Ottomans were vying for control of the Black Sea, and both empires were facing the threat of grassroots insurrections. The Ottomans planned to choke the emergent Russian fleet off from the Mediterranean and hasten their collapse, while the Russians wanted unrestricted access to the Mediterranean and figured that a French victory over the Central Powers would finally allow that.

When the British threw in with the French, things turned sour for the Ottomans. The Brits began an aggressive campaing of support for nationalist uprisings within the Ottoman Empire, which ultimately ripped the empire apart at the seams.

Of course, that is just the political aspect of the conflict. Economically, all of the old empires (Russian, Ottoman, Austrian) were in rapid decline, as they were being out-muscled for resources by the modern capitalist empires in Great Britain, the United States, France, and Japan (Germany was just beginning to become a modern capitalist empire) which were all experiencing explosive growth. The aristocrat class had yet to completely fall to the bourgeoisie in the old empires, and the differences in productivity between the competing modes of production was stark. That is why the Austrian, Russian, and Ottoman empires were obliterated by the end of the war.

No, but nice try.

The Middle East is pretty funny tbh, but nothing compares to India and Pakistan.

It wouldn't be the meme machine it is today if not for British Imperialism.

Everyone hates bike assholes.

Sometimes terrorists are right.

Hmm you just backed up what I said but then you ended your post with 'no nice try'.

Im confused.

The Ottomans were in survival mode. If they lost the Black Sea to the Russian Empire, then their own empire would collapse. Egypt already had one foot out the door, and if the caliphet showed further weakness they could have taken the rest of North Africa with them. They were not interested in expansion. They wanted to hang onto what they already controlled.

Couldnt they have just said that empire was bad and stopped being imperial?

To put it another way, IMO up until WW2 everything was Britain and France's fault, afterwards the blame shifted almost entirely to America with the exception of the Suez Crisis which was too shady even for the US to play along with

What about 1200 years ago?

Protip America is only 250 years old so you cant blame them?

Obviously I meant 'everything in modern middle east history' you pedantic fuck.

That is not how class conflict works. The aristocrats' lives, livelihood, and way of living were in immediate jeopardy. The revolutionaries invariably kills the aristocrat class in a revolution, which the assassination of Ferdinand illustrated beautifully.