Have you thought on making your own ideology/ system? If yes how would it look like?

Have you thought on making your own ideology/ system? If yes how would it look like?

pic unrelated

No.

Yes.

Its called anarcho-pikeyism. I control everything as a secret dictator, get rid of all heavy industry and revert back to an agricultural society. Most people farm potatoes, but the women, Scandinavians and midgets all work in the cheese mines. Theirs no police, just a lot of loyal dogs that will kill and eat people if they don't have potatoes and cheese on them. Did i mention all the drinking water has loads and loads of
LSD in it?

ive been searching for years for the perfect ideology. At long last, i have seen the light.

Sounds like the basis for a '90s point-and-click puzzle.

it sounds like the perfect political ideology. Your life is centered around food and work, everything else is up too you. As long as you have cheese and potatoes, your free to do as you please.

Because you see, the dogs will just instantly kill anyone who isn't being a productive member of society, removing them and freeing up more resources for the whole of the global collective. This will, in turn, increase productivity of the masses, and since what you need to not be killed by dogs is the same thing that sustains the whole population, only the truly lazy and useless people will be eaten.
The LSD in the water has 2 purposes. 1, it keeps the population in a state of eternal enlightenment, realizing life without the individual ego getting in the way of day to day life. 2, it keeps people in line while preserving their individual autonomy.

I've though about it, but I don't see much point in it. I'd rather just advocate different aspects of different ideologies in different scenarios.

If I ever did, it would include Bookchin's approach to understanding technology and nature, Mao's approach to imperialism and third-world resistance, Trotsky's approach to the prospects of successfully establishing socialism in one country, Emma Goldman's approach to understanding gender relations, Daniel DeLeon's approach to industrial labor politics, Kropotkin's approach to understanding human nature, and Huey P. Newtons approach to urban resistance and racial politics.

It would also work in Eugenics by voluntary sterilizations and genetic engineering, as well as a Stirnerite Egoist conception of morality, and technocratic methods for democratic decision making.

I already have.
A hybrid of the best aspects of Technocracy and a total Stratocracy.

All of the working age population holds a military rank and maintains military discipline during work hours.
Indeed the military and the state are the same entity.
The economy would be centrally planned and based upon a thermo-economic system.
Most aspects of society (Education, Industrial Production, Transportation etc) would be organized into 'corps', in a vaguely syndicalist like manner.

...

I wrote an entire manifesto this one time

this is peak liberalism fuck off

have to bring this up again bc she's still right

nice try Mussolini

Everything would be nationalized. The government would consist of a parliament thats proportional representation and multi party. As well as all the nationalized industry being head by people elected by ranked choice voting. There wouldn’t be large cities. Instead it would be mostly small towns and villages where all the factories are underground. Because of this there’s lot’s of farms. Most people are farmers. Also everyone has to serve in the military for two years at minimum after education which includes everything from kinda garden to collage. There would be a above 2.0 birth rate. It’s an ideology for a space colony.

Also there genetic engineering to make people smarter and healthier.

The genetic engineering is mandatory.

The ideological supermarket is only fit for looting, I cobble together what I like.

faggot

What a wonderful in-depth criticism.

One has to wonder how the left has not already conquered the word when it has such intellectuals on its side.

I hate to say it, but have you thought about human nature? Just what are you trying to achieve, Howard?

Yet you did.
Remember that the next time some asshole brings that up regarding Socialism.

you will have to be more specific in regards to what you are asking.

The maximization of overall happiness.

...

wow old timey popsci was retarded

The eternal anglo strikes again.

My own ideas are more or less a blend of DeLeonion/Marxist syndicalism, council communism, and communalism.

Given that both personally constructed ideologies are the topic of this thread, and the number of questions I receive on this board regarding my ideology.
I have to say that the material evidence does not back up your claim.


There was plenty of silly ideas, sure.
But almost everything had at-least a kernel of a good idea in it, even if it was not expressed well.

Before I became an anarchist I had an idea for democratising the state through different means;
there would be bicameralist
and somewhat parliamentary government where the upper house would be a small amount of ideologues from political parties that are elected based upon propositional representation. This upper house can only propose laws, which are based upon ideological fervour that you often find in part politics and is meant to act as the driving force of the politics of the country.
The president would be elected based upon the propositional representation vote and the cabinet would all be elected by the voter.
the lower house would be a larger group of seats of locally represented MPs voted on the first-past-the-post system and are intended to merely locally represent their constituency and accept laws based upon how it would affect those they represent. This is intended to be a more conservative reviewers of the more radical upper house. However, when I made this system I wasn't really sure if the lower house would accept party politics or not.
The system didn't have an economic model of it's own but I guess it could work to anything.

It's an ideology that likes to puts symbolic emphasis on "There's a spectre haunting X" (perhaps "spectrism"?): a strain of pragmatic, non-sectarian Socialism/Leftism that collaborates with any and all leftist ideologies and sects in every country, even S.trasserists. By doing this, the Bourgeoisie class/the State won't know what to fucking do because you'd have SocDems/DemSocs trying to legally get into office, Maoists in the cities and countryside grow by mobile, fluid facilities and armies and Anarchists being Anarchists, effectively making Leftism a boogeyman among the current establishment

That seems like more of a strategy then an ideology.
A rather confusing and nonsensical strategy at that.

Why would I need to make my own ideology when a perfect ideology already exists?

...

Low-hanging fruit 2bh

I've been thinking a bit about this at least in regards to what comes after the revolution.

I'm sort of split between full on communization and all that because I won't deny that it is essentially the purest form of communism.
On the other hand one of my main concern is 1. having a materially functioning society that fullfills peoples needs and prevents a capitalist slideback. 2. More free time.

I'm sort of drawn to the idea of extremely rigid work-duty to provide the material basis for free access. However this work duty would be time-limited to something like 20 hours a week max, with the overall aim towards its gradual reduction. War Communism but geared towards free time basically. This gradual reduction could come quickly as the reserve army is reintegrated, autocratic management is disassembled and so on. Now of course this could probably be achieved voluntarily along the lines of what is suggested by Kropotkin.
Professional sports, art, music, and such would disappear in favour of a society where every individual is an artist, musician, athlete, what have you. End the separation between the artist and the people.

Baseline economy is extremely time-limited barracks communism with work-duty instead of wage-labour, more free time then leaves room for communization efforts to supplant this work-duty. Dictatorship of the proletariat should be the armed workers organized as a class ruling directly, not a single party state along the bolshie lines. Take the good parts of State and Revolution and do that, follow what Lenin said rather than what he did.

Apart from that I think Marx-syn, council com, communalism mix is pretty close to what I support.

some new spin on russian nihilism or something

...

It's hard not to pick the low-hanging fruit when it's fucking everywhere

Parody, yeah, but not very convincing really regardless.