You liberal CUCKS need to learn basic economics

you liberal CUCKS need to learn basic economics
supply and demand decide who gets what and not what you bloody liberal sjw CUCKS decide
Its called BASIC ECONOMICS

Other urls found in this thread:

libgen.io
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Wtf I'm a nazi now

Wtf I'm a liberal now

Nazis are CUCKS too
I like to fuck 9 year old asian traps and no govermint or cuck can stop me

fuck off

sounds like khomeini..

Economics is a pseudo-science created to overcomplicate relations between people. Economics schools are nothing but an hivemind of corruption apologists.
Your invisible hand does absolutely nothing.

Wtf I'm a braindead lolbert now

Who wants to buy some human children? Anyone?

nice sequence
In what way actually?

Fuck off REEEE LIBERALCUCK
TAXATION IS THEFT

PRIVATIZE
THE
MILITARY
AND
POLICE

Really activates my almonds

Libertarians are extremist liberals. Turn off the fox news for like 20 minutes and read something

FUCK OFF REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

They consented to give the surplus away, hence not theft you SJW retard

No wonder there are no smart lolbert economists

Oh shit awesome argument.

We're not liberals you fucking faggot.
Are you a shitskin by any chance?

T-thanks, free market…

this is why we cant have nice things

It's literally not theft. I feel sorry for you.
And it's normal to have to work or starve. Nobody is obligated to feed you.


You signed the contract, kid.

right back at ya, ya dingus

sage shit threads, sage goes in the email

Defenitely not theft.

this is some really quality bait desu

either braindead or troll, hard to tell

Yes, because you signed a contract.

Not literally, but so to speak.
It would be theft if he was forcing you to do it. Otherwise you're agreeing to it and selling the imaginary 'surplus value' because it makes you better off.

Sure sounds volontary to me.

The boss isn't responsible for the threat of starvation. 'Nature', not your boss, is forcing you to work.

ids human nadure to do eggonomigs. loony libbeys btfo!!

so if I stab my boss in the throat and take his luxurious goods, is that nature? sounds like it.

property is a meaningless fucking abstraction, go shove your liberal bullshit down some more gullible throats elsewhere.

It really isn't. Go try your theory out at the nearest supermarket and see :^)

i do whenever i dont have any money and hey it works fine lol

the same supermarket that's defended by the state to make sure the proles don't get too much food. That could be a disaster!

lmao

Capitalism, which the boss is an active part of by his very nature as a boss, is responsible for not allowing the people who create goods to enjoy their full value.

WEW LAD

It's not a meaningless abstraction if countries all over the world enforce it.

He said property.

the cops enforce it, retard

It would be nice if he specified what kind

what is property?

Theft. (for private property, of course)

His 'active part' is a voluntary relation with the worker

...

the law of nature dictates the strong rule the weak. therefor, a group of employees should rule their singular employer (and kill him)

yeah I wonder who's enforcing it

who consented to him being boss or owning property that could be managed by the commons?

False. People have to indulge in capitalism or die or starvation.

Pretty much this
The burden of proof as to the need or existence of privet property falls on those who advocate it, and normally they just fall back on enlightenment feel good liberal bullshit

Nobody. Or maybe they democratically chose to have that system of property.

its time to start de "capital-sage" cycle.
sage - poor quality thread - sage'

Capitalism is, not nature. Vastly different.

why should you prevent nature from taking its course and tell the lions to come to a mutual contract that allows the zebra to collect part of their meat instead of letting them just tear all zebras to shreds

they democratically chose to have that system of property because the boss fucking duped them into believing it's necessary

Capitalism might force you to work, but that's normal. And you aren't forced to work for anyone in particular, so you can't say anyone is stealing from you.

I mean no one is forcing you to pay taxes to any state in particular so no one is stealing from you :^)

ummm… no i mean… where would i go??? that's not right… thats not fair!!

That would be true if I signed a contract when I moved into a state, and if all the states were someone's property.

Just start your own businesscountry dude

you signed a contract when you were born in a hospital, bucko. now pay your fuckin taxes

this basically btfos lolberts

simply leave the country

It's not the same thing imo

it absolutely is. who built that hospital? who gave birth to you? you didn't spring fully formed from the head of zeus, someone gave you life. thats a contract.

It doesn't follow

...

someone absolutely did make a choice to create life. now you're their property and owe them filial piety until they abandon you

Its just human nature to be born dude. 'Nature' is forcing you to be born.

says who? them?
fuck them

just the law of nature :-)

They're my property tbqhwyf

I just realized you were being sarcastic

Your own body is a paradigm case of property.


Just because we draw a distinction between mind and body does not make us dualists

only if you're talking about the Austrian School

No Arguments: The Thread

u wagecucks need to learn advanced economics, modal algebra, and stochastic processes. supply and demand have no influence on long-run prices.

If the US government listened to Sowell we would have a revolution within 10 years. I'm a fan.

noooooooooooooo fug :DDDD

do you have a pdf for this? looks good

Lmao no, if the us listened to sowell the dollar would be non-existent.

libgen.io

Now we're getting somewhere.

...

And Socialism is called advanced Economics.

No user, you are the liberal.

The "unscientific" Austrian school merely says that prices are determined subjectively and the market as a whole is built up from individual rational and irrational decisions in countless situations unique to unique individuals. For example, one person might pay 100,000 for a limited edition Rainbow Dash beanie baby based on their autism, and another would throw it away.

Therefore, macro quantitive analysis in a free market is very crude. There's way too much information that is not captured. This is being rediscovered in the "behavioral economics" field.

i dont and it's also a thousand pages technical work that costs 50 bucks

no

neoclassical economics is garbage and has no relation to how economies actually function.