The fuck's wrong with communists?

The fuck's wrong with communists?

>this time our coup revolution will be a part of the inevitable dialectical development of history, honest

It keeps happening.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change
youtube.com/watch?v=JM5WqJp7tUQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

just embrace left accelerationism, my fam, then prepare to welcome our AI overlords

whomstvt couldsnt evere thinke that the reigne of mine lordes could ende?

they never read a book outside of Marx and his buttbuddies

Maybe if capitalism wasn't such trash you wouldn't have so many people trying to escape from it?

...

...

Nigga fucking please

THE FIRE OF HUMAN LIBERTY BURNS WITHIN ME DEMON

That's why you should be an anarchist :^)

wew lads i guess cia and nato dont real

According to what was posited in response to Land's assertion that there can be no left accelerationism on the basis of a critique of Srnicek and Williams's works, it was developed as a thesis that what has entered absolute deterritorialization under capitalism is not technological development, which in turn constantly revolutionizes the organization of value production (as posited by Land), but rather it is the process of value production itself which has entered this state of no return and the destruction of any state of being in the traditional sense (as it means an elimination of equilibrium). In both conceptions, one is a mechanism of directing its own reproduction by controlling the physical world. With left accelerationism, however, it's proposed than an absolute, immediate acceleration of value production will make it entirely impossible - it is only by the failure to consciously revolutionize the system within the expanding bounds brought about by its own deterritorialization through advance of information technology that we will create any sort of AI which replaces the human as the common unit of mediating the transformation of energy into useful forms by work before the entire historical system of this work-capacity mediation breaks down through the main system's own deterritorialization and leaves us with communism.
AI overlords mean game over and either that the Landian accelerationists were right or that we didn't do our job right.

feudalism ended when the necessary conditions for feudalism ended

the market will endure for as long as demand outstrips supply when price = 0

Saying things like "dialectical development of history" without knowing what that means won't make your high school-tier objection to Communism sound literate and well-thought-out this time my dude

why don't you just call yourself right wing?

Still waiting for the rebuttal

...

DUDE SAYS LAW LMAO

If we don't establish a commune, the top 1% will do it themselves. We'll have nothing else to do but starve while machines take our place. Get it now?

did someone say coups?

And that's just North America
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change

I'd say banker software counts as AI overlord already, so we're way past the point of no return.

WE'RE BREAKING THE CONDITIONING!

Naziposter is actually correct. You cannot just force socialism to come into being and that is the mistake of most revolutionaries. Automation has the potential to actually disrupt capitalism to such a degree that even UBI will not save it, as it violates the basic logic of capitalism to begin with. The problem comes with being prepared before the bourgeoisie realize that exterminism is their only option other than being deposed by a revolution.

This. As an ironic example, China is much more fit for communist revolution than it was before the Maoist regime.

Capitalism will sell us the rope, but narcissistic cult personalities refuse to wait for a sale and insist on bartering their life savings to get what they want immediately.

The Chinese government suspect that if they were to have a general election tomorrow, the Maoists would win.

Read up on communization. And you do realize that most of the "revolutions", you are thinking of aren't even socialist? I mean ignoring eastern Europe and their tank-instituted "socialism", other popular ones like Vietnam or Cuba were primarily national liberations, which formed alliance with USSR/PRC became their interest (eg. nationalizing US industry) went contrary to US interests. And of course you could get a lot of support from the population by calling yourself socialist or similar. Other than that, it still doesn't make sense to look at a mode of production on a nation to nation basis. After all, capitalism underlies all of this. Just because smuggling good over the border isn't legal, doesn't exempt it from being part of capitalism, and just because black markets are illegal, doesn't bot make them integral parts of the system. It's slightly more complex than " Successful country A implemented system X, and unsuccessful country B implemented Y, therefore X is better ".

Could you post where this video comes from ?

youtube.com/watch?v=JM5WqJp7tUQ

Thanks, that was hilarious.