Bunkermag Response to Jason Unruhe

bunkermag.org/response-jason-unruhe/

Other urls found in this thread:

bunkermag.org/third-world-cannot-bring-global-socialism/
maoistrebelnews.com/2017/04/21/refuting-victor-villanuevas-anti-proletarian-theory/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

Previous articles:

Bunkermag: bunkermag.org/third-world-cannot-bring-global-socialism/

Jason: maoistrebelnews.com/2017/04/21/refuting-victor-villanuevas-anti-proletarian-theory/

Ow.

So tl;dr jason didn't read the article and threw a hissyfit. It's kinda amusing that he thought that low effort response was adequate.

KEK

We're just running in circles here, c'mon Holla Forums, when will you admit Marxist economism is an intellectual burden and you can only be an effective anti-imperialist by becoming NazBol?

unruhe will now respond that this response is "literally not an argument"

finally someone who admits this

nazbol is stalinism's autistic stepbrother so no

>Mao himself was no stranger to class collaborationism, willing to put up with domestic bourgeoise in the name of anti-imperialism, “The national bourgeoisie differs from the imperialists, the landlords and the bureaucrat-capitalists. The contradiction between the national bourgeoisie and the working class is one between exploiter and exploited, and is by nature antagonistic. But in the concrete conditions of China, this antagonistic contradiction between the two classes, if properly handled, can be transformed into a non-antagonistic one and be resolved by peaceful methods.”[2] It is then no wonder that Deng would later liberalize the economy, and redefine socialism as capitalist development.

LOL WUT

Unruhe>>>>>>>>>>>>>Holla Forums

sorry but it's true

Third Worldism is the biggest crock of shit to come out of the Left since EuroCommunism and PoMo.

So, 3rd Worlders are somehow more "authentic socialists" than 1st Worlders simply because they've never had or have barely gone through a stage of capitalism? Not only is that completely illogical but it's also profoundly un-materialist and relies on a complete mystification of 3rd Worlders (the noble savage).

On the contrary, we are "more authentic socialists" *because* we've had a 200-year struggle AGAINST capitalism.

Realize too that most of these 3rd World countries have only been capitalist for the past 50-70 years after decolonization. Socialist revolution isn't just about development but also about consciousness and the will of the people, and it's blatantly obvious that 3rd Worlders don't identify as proles but keep with their religious, ethnic, and tribal identities first and foremost. There's a good reason why nearly all the violence and militarism going on in the 3rd World is NOT anti-capitalist but ethnic and religious strife (Sunni vs. Shia, Muslim vs. Christian, Hindu vs. Sikh, etc.).

So in other words 3rd Worldism is completely bunk.

There's no doubt in my mind he'll focus his next response 90% on this one case of "personal attack" without responding to the actual thesis of the article.

Is anyone going to tweet this article to him?

Unruhe completely BTFO.

...

We should get personal attacks man and not an argument man to debate, just imagine the memery potential

New Democracy paved the way for revisionism.

no u

This.

...

He looks like he's about to go full Columbine.

One can only hope

It is true but it doesn't make either one good.

Rumor is, he raped a girl years ago and his mom covered it up.

rumour is, he's a huge fuckin idiot relevant only in the sense that his larping and shitty politics make the rest of us look bad

gtfo EuroCommunism was actually good for its time, because there was no justification for the retardedness of tankism.

eurocommunism was not good for any time you reformist shill

This.

Yeah, with the only source on this being some random feminist crazy in a comment section somewhere I have no doubt to take this as gospel.