/leftipol/ - identifying problems without offering solutions

/leftipol/ - identifying problems without offering solutions

What happens the day after the revolution, comrades? Do you all become conservatives and wait for the cycle to repeat?

Easy to bark at the moon. How about you offer a comprehensive, easy to implement, competitive internationally and fair domestically model.

Other urls found in this thread:

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_communism
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-syndicalism
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_communism
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Confederalism
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Themes_in_Nazi_propaganda#Jews
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Simple, make sure that we ensure that our institutions educate the masses and help the workers (not the state) control the means of production, arm said workers as there are likely to be those who want to fuck with our revolution.

Honestly Holla Forums, read a fucking book, your political illiteracy is showing.

How do you protect the post-revolution from foreign capitalist powers?

Fuck yeah. Preach it, Bat'ko.

โ€ฆ Or at least, I think you're Bat'ko. ^^; I automatically assume any user with that flag is Bat'ko, to be honest.

Attacking and overthrowing them

Utopianism is bad and you should feel bad.

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/

When all the labor is automated does this mean the mudbloods will go back home and stop killing us in the streets to redeem their soul for that one time they had a sip of whiskey?

Sounds like asking for a civil war, as the armed people fail to stick together and start fighting each other over trivialities, and a foreign power invades with its organized military and the idea of bringing peace and order to your people. A noble, humanitarian invasion that you enabled.

By collectively producing and utilizing guns, tanks planes, and atomic bombs, obviously.

As opposed to the much, much, much worse solution which is offering solutions without identifying problems.

like N.Korea?

Stop contradicting my worldview.

Stormniggers are basically right wing SJWs at this point

Yeah. North Korea will try to defend itself by whatever means it has, as is their "right".

If the revolution is not global it will always end up being an authoritarian state like the URSS, China, North Korea etc.

If its global it will end in multiple authoritarian states. It only takes one of the revolution leaders to decide he doesn't like what another is doing, and everything spirals out of control.
The revolution you imagine can only work in laboratory conditions.

So a communist utopia is impossible.
brb killing self

P E R M A N E N T R E V O L U T I O N
E
R
M
A
N
E
N
T

R
E
V
O
L
U
T
I
O
N

Jee Wiz satan, it's not like there aren't any other forms of socialism/ communism which advocate for decentralised power and autonomy!

Oh waitโ€ฆ

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_communism

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-syndicalism

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_communism

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Confederalism

We're waiting for any of these types of revolution to occur. Until that, M-L has the monopoly of tried-and-true revolutionary method.

The anarcho-syndicalist revolution happened in Britain, they just all got shot at from warships and had the army sent to deal with them.

Rightio lad

Hence why it's important to do this

Invaded and conquered, because commie-anarchist societies can't produce heavy artillery, tanks or aircraft.
There goes your revolution into the sewer. This is exactly why I ask how you will preserve your state. Protip: you can't. War requires centralization and total mobilization that a free state can't provide.

Rightio lad

*Rojava

I ignore it, because it only existed for a couple of years, and during a period of civil war.
Basically other defacto states in the region are shielding it from being destroyed by being even bigger pests themselves.
This model will not persist, either the region will be Balkanized into conventional states, or incorporated back into a united Syria.

You asked for what would happen in a revolution, we provided you an example

Your arguments are incoherent m8.

You mean

It is tried and tested, and you are ignoring the results. The only successful revolutions are the French, American and Russian, and they all resulted in centralized power, much more centralized than had been before said revolutions ironically.

...

The fascists next door invaded and annexed the withing a few years, dummy.

Not an argument. It functions as a libertarian socialist economy and society which BTFO of the Daesh.


You're not even trying m8.

Right after they got back stabbed by the Soviet Union.

Again

You're either advocating for Marxist Leninism, or Titoism.

You asked for what we would do during a hypothetical revolution, as oppose to going back to """conservatism""" when we provided you answers you started shifting goal posts, and changed the subject.

Stick to one topic in future you sperg

I can offer solutions to specific problems, but those are not indeed the big solutions.

I don't know what they ought to be. But I don't think that is relevant at the current stage, either: we must build a movement and from that movement, our solutions will arise. The current struggle is ideological in nature: how to free ourselves from the ideology that makes change impossible, and so on.

I'm very Zizekian when it comes to this. We can not currently imagine or theoretize how exactly should we organize ourselves tomorrow. We hardly have a very clear picture of where we are today.

We can learn from the previous revolutions, of course: for example, from China we can take that we should build the post-revolution movement in a very inclusive way. In particular, we need to include all generations, not only the young. The young can get too violent and too quick to make expensive mistakes.

Why isn't Israel communist? Surely the sons of the greatest tribe would practice the teachers lessons after the leaders of the Soviet Union so great and prosperous for all peoples, after all the majority of the original leaders were Jews, until Stalin purged them. Why would he do that? It worked so well. Surely they're our the greatest ally.

Forgive me for missing a comma, I don't want to go to the gulag daddy Stalin, oh daddy please don't send me there with the ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€others you don't agree with๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€ please, please please.

Ha ha ha ha, funny guy. Go to gulag.

According to Hitler they were capitalist too.

Maybe, and I know this is hard for people like you to process, maybe the Jews aren't a hivemind?

Who knows, probably another layer of jewish conspiracy

How? I'd love to see a quote.

...

You're right! They weren't all Jews! Muhhh Holodomor.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Themes_in_Nazi_propaganda#Jews


CITATIONClose[1] Koonz, Claudia (2003). The Nazi Conscience. Harvard University Press. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-674-01172-4.

Perhaps you'd like to team up and kill Capitalism, then fight each other later?

Sure. Between us we have around 0 tanks, 0 planes, 0 ships, 0 soldiers, and around 200000 fat NEET male virgins.
Capitalists, watch out!

It's how it was for us in the end. Destroyer of Worlds. Could have had it all, a future for all. Should have used gas.

Fuck me this board is slow, do you bot or what?

Utopianism always leads to failure. You want easy answers, which is why you're a Holla Forumsack, but these easy answers don't exist.

Stras.ser tried that. But in the end, Hitler was more commited to Capital that he was to the Germans.
And Stras;ser got purged.

The world is an unfair place.

We try, but it gets attacked on the right by fascists/capitalists, and on the left by leftcoms and other armchair socialists.

10 year old understanding of revolution OP, I bet you think the state is just cops and robbers too.

Permanent revolution is the worst meme.