Is being a NEET a protest against the current system? Will my status and benefits be protected under gommunism? I want to watch anime and not work, apparently Holla Forums thinks this is degenerate.
Is being a NEET a protest against the current system? Will my status and benefits be protected under gommunism...
Other urls found in this thread:
marxists.org
twitter.com
who the fuck wants to be a neet? this is shit, i actually want to do something with my life. Get a fucking life worth living you shit.
...
A society that has to pull deadweight will be simply conquered and wiped out by a society that doesnt. That's my opinion. If a group of modern Spartans, who all know their weapons and are in top form and so on, clashed with a group of modern people who are fat, lazy, obsessed with trivial shit because there is not infinite amount of stuff to go around, the Spartans would simply be favored by the universe, and the other group wouldnt exist.
Anyway that's what I think. Weakness should be a sin instead of a virtue, a thing to punish instead of a thing to reward, a thing to reduce instead of multiply.
If you can do it and make it sustainable, I say go for it. I just hope you have a way of developing yourself.
No, it is not. The unemployed are probably the data collector's best workers. You'll really be protesting if you delete all of your accounts and go talk to people IRL.
are you implying that anyone who doesn't have a regular job (or refuses to have one) is fat, lazy and weak?
It's a LARPer, don't even bother.
Under the current system, yes. But if you're asked for a couple hours a week of labor under socialism, would you really refuse?
not if it was something i enjoyed and was good at
...
its okay to be a neet under capitalism but under socialism you will be given a job and if you don't work than you can fuck off in the woods somewhere. It will be different under fully automated gay luxury space communism but in the decades in the meantime your not getting away with parasitism
The only way for you is nazi social democracy.
Under ancapitalism society will fall apart
Under non nazi social democracy you will have your benefits taken away for being white and anime would be outlawed
Under communism there would be no anime coming out of Japan
OK see, you my comrade. I'm a maintenance guy, so I'm a glorified neet anyways. I work for two hours and spend the next six pretending to work
well no, if you have your own farm for example, but I wouldnt consider you a neet in that case, i guess it just depends on what we call neet
I just think that if you arent self sufficient, you must be pulling someone down or perish, and society that has a whole bunch of people pulling someone else down would be wiped out by a society that doesnt (if all other things are equal)
tell me more
...
Traps aren't gay and you fucking know it
neet means you aren't employed and aren't enrolled in any education institution. it's pretty simple
who in this society is self-sufficient? do you grow your own wheat to make your own bread? do you raise your own animals to produce your own meat? everyone gets something from someone else
like the capitalists and the state?
well i work as an electrician, i fish from time to time, and im pursuing an engineering degree at university and have 0 debt so far, never borrowed money in my life..
i consider myself self sufficient simply because i am alive, and while i do not grow my own wheat, i do electric installations in houses of people who do, and they trade me wheat for the cables
no for real i went to the dentist a few times like this, and from time to time if i have the opportunity i trade this for that, i do not obsess with profit as long as i am afloat
i just dont think that neets have either any marketable skills they can use in trade, or weaponry to take things by force, so in case a natural disaster or some shit happens, and there's not enough shit for everyone, neets will be starved first
"Is being a NEET a protest against the current system?" Thread #10,502
They don't have wombs and are incapable of baring children. Therefore having sex with them is LITERALLY hwite genocide.
...
I'm currently a NEET and I wish I could do some meaningful work 15-20 hours a week, instead of only having the choice to become either a wageslave or a worthless lazy ass full-time.
NEET is the cowardly path. (Which I'm currently on.)
The end philosophical conclusion should be suicide. There is no ethical consumption under capitalism, so why not cease consuming? The game only works if death is considered a failure-state, if you fight it. Why not embrace it? If the choice is to be "work for me or die", why not die?
This position may need revising as labourers become less-and-less necessary and this position changes from fucking everyone (depriving porky of labour and yourself of life) to aiding fully-automated-luxury-porkyism, but at present it remains the case. Doubly so if you kill yourself in a JobCentre (only yourself, though. Mass murder is bad, okay?) or better yet in the middle of a work capacity assessment as a political statement about the nature of the welfare system today.
Porky is a much bigger example of a deadweight than the entirety of NEEThood globally.
(Unless we consider exploiting others a valid form of self-sufficiency, but then having the capacity to get your parents to feed you or the state to throw unemployment money at you is self sufficiency…)
or murder-suicide. or just murder (my choice)
...
Saved.
On the one hand, you're not giving Porky any surplus-value.
On the other hand, you're still mooching off other people surplus-value via taxes, and feeding it back into the capitalist economy.
In a way, you are a capitalist in a minuscule scale. A Nano-Porky.
but arent we all porkys of tesla for shitposting on the internet, and of that guy who cured polio etc etc?
there is no surplus value, there is only lawful contract
Yes modern cubicle work is definitely the same as being a spartan warrior.
REEEEEEE
Might be.
No, you'll be sent to gulag for "re-education". Be an anarchist instead.
Only indirectly, assuming MMT or something similar is correct.
(tl;dr taxes don't actually pay for spending, that's a meme. taxes help to control inflation while the government can fund any ongoing spending commitment with their ability to create money.)