I need help. Recently, I've started feeling hate towards homosexuality, thinking of it as unnecessary, grotesque, and the "accept me for who I am" speech as childish.
Since you're lefties, I'm assuming many of you are at the least bisexual. I would appreciate any literature and propaganda you have on how to be more tolerant, and how to respect those who disgust you. Because I can't deal with this hate…
Other urls found in this thread:
What does it have to do with you though? I think country music is moronic and grotesque but I don't try to ban it. If you don't want to do gay stuff then don't.
Do you have any normal gay friends? By normal I mean people who don't make their sexuality the center of their personality.
Being friends with someone of a certain group generally makes you less likely to hate it.
Well pal I think you just have some growing up to do.
Odd assumption.
Personally I just don't care. I think two guys kissing in public is icky, but I don't think it ranks among the top problems of this world.
Besides, the world is big enough not to have to deal with that stuff anyway. One example is the polyps I heard complaining about degenerate cities such as SF, but does it matter? It's not like polyps would want to live there anyway.
Just as long as people keep public displays of affection and nudity to a minimum, we're fine. The rest is just personal preference.
Why? Wil you let a mere feeling dictate your life?
Just stop giving a fuck about other people's sex faggot.
Faggots who march in parades and run their mouths about their homosexuality are cancer but for others just ignore them like anyone else.
Also I think that hating something is kind of a first reaction that comes with rejection. When you see more of it you start to become less sensitive to it and it stops seeming so gross. Your feelings are understandable but imho you can rationally figure out that there's no reason to hate on gay people.
There isn't much stuff to be said that you haven't heard already. I also think men kissing each other is pretty awkward and the "accept me for who I am" speech sounds stupid, but I wouldn't say it's "unnecessary", as it implies there's much choice and I'm speaking from autopsy, despite my bisexuality I fancy men more than women I have fucked fetishes I can't fucking get rid off and I would probably commit sudoku if somebody ever found out about them
interesting what part of the accept "me for whom I am speech" do you find childish, and why? Do you yourself feel you have to hide an important part of who you are?
And these other words "unnecessary, grotesque" To say that sex is "necessary" or "unnecessary" is a very unusual point of view.
Is there perhaps another reason you "can't deal with this hate" Why you want us, to say homosexuality is okey?
It's okey you know, there is nothing wrong or unnatural about they way you where born. Only pain and shame will come from this charade, love and pleasure awaits you once you become true to yourself.
Others will accept you for who you are.
If you hate homosexuality, then why do you sound like a whiny faggot
...
Fags should go back in the closet, as soon as they were normalized hormone treatment for transchildren become the norm and pedophilia and bestiality are right around the corner too.
Peoples behaviors shape society and this "as long as it's not bothering you" is libertarian every man an island bullshit. Society is an organism and maladaptive behaviors should not be encouraged.
fug>>1536856
Time to sleep
fugg, I forgot you can't say that in english
Homosexuality is unnatural and must be expunged from our society.
Why do people still push this maymay despite tons of evidence showing that a lot of animals engage in it?
Feels >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reals.
'Nuff said.
Is what you really mean to say "homosexuality occurs as a consequence of abnormal psychological development?" More nuanced language is always better than less nuanced language.
Kill yourself
but yeah dude realz>feelz, free love amirite??????
I don't know if just looking for correlations is the most sound methodology there.
I'm gay and I get a little uncomfortable when I see straight people making out in parks or in movies tbh. I imagine this is similar to how straight people feel when they see gays doing the same thing. Doesn't mean I want to ban all straight people though.
Honestly though I know more than one gay person who hates straight people vehemently but they're a dying breed.
It's just that, say, a certain gay person makes a point of talking to me, but still acting all queer and speaking in voice tones I didn't know exist. Now, if my face demonstrates, usually automatically, the slightest hint of my repugnance, he will become offended and call me, or at least think of me, as an hateful monstrous homophobe.
I do, even in my family, I guess it's the ones who DO
that bothers me…
I guess so, yes, detachment will help.
And is that really supposed to be a good thing…?
Many homosexuals seem to me as psychological shut-ins who are caught in their narcissistic vortexes, rejecting any conventional means of expression towards a more definite form of self-assertion, a way of finding an identity, a distinguishing mark, not attention-seeking in the sense that they want Others' attention, but really their own. Paradoxically, they find their own identities through the conventionalised "unconventional" forms of being—such as homosexuality.
I mean, in these cases, I just think they're making life so much harder for themselves, I really don't believe it's their Destiny to be gay, that's deep embedded in their souls, and so I don't get why go through all the trouble.
For the sake of social interaction, I do think all of us have to sacrifice a bit of our innermost subjective and emotional lives to cooperate and concentrate on the larger problems.
I know I'm an hypocrite.
I guess.
Not "live there" but rather regain that place and repurpose it into something useful, non-degenerate and functional.
It's a natural reaction.
Gay people are disfunctional, they should be hated, they are disgusting for people not-totally-brainwashed by the "accepting" movement bullshit.
Although i respect each person's privacy and tastes, obviously gay behaviour should be at least "not encouraged" in the sense of spending government money in that degenerate way of living..
i don't think that ignoring strong correlations between mental illness, sexuall transmitted disease, dominance hierarchy behavior, rejection by women, improper parental behavior, genetic mutations and homosexuality is an intelligent stance to take. I think all signs point to it being a vaguely, harmless, undesirable fate that shouldn't be encouraged or protected by society.
...
...
i hate normies making out in public, if i sense two people (m&f) are in love i never feel uncomfortable unless they're being gratuitious and overly sexual in their show of affection. the sight of a man and woman in love is beautiful and enlivening
Even you point out that fucking each other in the ass is so apparently natural that even retarded animals with no neo-cortex and a lack of language systems or organized ethics do that, just stop trying to play "muh nature" card because that's almost sad.
Well so are image boards but here we are.
Reactionary spooks. I think cheese smells like ass and is gross but I'm not going to tell people they can't eat it.
I think you're talking about the behavior for those who subscribe to the modern LGBT movement. The movement was a reaction against those who wish to restrict sexual and social freedom over arbitrary feelings and not any objective standpoint (like say, rape or murder). While I agree the LGBT "community" is nothing more than identity politics, you need to separate the state of someone being homosexual from the act of joining a cultural movement, otherwise you just join into the idpol and make it worse. There would be no gay culture or parades or rainbow flags if reactionaries would just let live.
if we want to appeal to completely arbitrary abstract human ethics then homosexuality is bad because its unproductive, entirely centered around sexual desire and spreads mental and physical illness. It correlates strongly with hard drug abuse, childhood sex abuse (the startling number of homosexuals who were abused at a young age is telling), mentall illness and hedonistic behavior. Therefore its unproductive and anti-social and should be discouraged just like drug addiction is.
There, you idiot
...
Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Homophobia Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Faggots Fucking In The Street Close Your Eyes Haha
Yeah, this'll make sure you get a good answer.
Doubleposting but:
Let's suppose i have two populations of humans, 100 each one. In one of them, i will instigate, by propaganda, chemicals, and other means, to force them to be gay. In the second one, i will generate propaganda in favor of traditional roles and family. Two hundred years after i will confront both groups and let's see which one has made most progress (i.e.: scientific or technical achievements, that kind of progress). Also, i would like to know which one has the strongest "army" or group of people willing to defend their kin, etc.
Which group do you believe will prosper, Holla Forums? the faggot infected weaklings, or the traditional one?
Gay behaviour is a disease and a problem because gay people won't reproduce, so they will remove themselves from the gene pool in time. Thus, in short, "unnatural and unconvenient for human society".
But i know that some natural and simple concepts are hard to grasp for you.
I'm not saying I'm restricting anyone's freedom, I'm not forbidding anything, I'm not banning anyone. Would I, if I had the power to? No, because I wouldn't accept that that sort of power, I wouldn't want anyone to have it, in fact. I value freedom, but there are some aspects in which I'd say: be yourself, by yourself, stay away from me. I mean, are there no standards anymore? On how to behave in public? On what the differences between private and public life are? Because putting up with your gay tics is like having to be in the presence of your B.O.
I need help. Recently, I've started feeling hate towards white people, thinking of them as unnecessary, grotesque, and the "Muh white race!" speech as childish.
Since you're alt right, I'm assuming many of you are at the least nazis. I would appreciate any literature and propaganda you have on how to be more of a retard, and how to scream memes and shit post arguments that btfo and disgust you.
Nice argument there. I thought you weren't easily triggered (by the offtopic image i posted, which is true, but irrelevant to the thread i think) but after the 8ch hack and your board fiasco regarding number of users, i would have known you were particularly sensitive these days.
pick one and only one.
It is a good advice to avoid these faggots, but also it would be wise to ask your respective governments to not-encourage "gay pride" and these sorts of shilling and propaganda. At least stop wassting people's money in these brainwashing. That's how i see it being in a third world hellhole where "socialism" failed to us (inb4 not real socialism)
Straight male here. Sexuality is not something you simply change based on your political leanings.
So lemme guess. You are one of those people who hate Game of Thrones but watch it so they have something to complain about. Especially towards friends and family, who actually like it and talk about it during their free time.
Because your obsession with homosex is kinda the same.
Game of Thrones is objectively bad though, its a bad show for normies
I've never felt comfortable making out or even holding hands in public. Not sure if that's because I'm gay and I fear people's reactions or because I'm socially awkward. Anyway, I kind of resent how open straight people are allowed to be while I'm forced to hide for fear of being beaten up.
The problem with this kind of reverse-statement, is that it is actually true that many 🍀🍀🍀 governments 🍀🍀🍀 and companies are actually what you parody, they are deeply triggering and problematic and anti-racist openly and spending tons of money in this propaganda efforts.
They are also censoring people, free speech, etc.
I hope you realize this.
They are mostly unnecessary, but think in terms of population and governance. Do you want your own people to be gay? If so, 100 years of so from now, if it were for you, they would self-extinguish.
You are clearly not thinking with all the data available, yet many of you call yourself "literate" by reading a bunch of mostly-jewed books.
You're not very accurate, but as I corrected you innerly, as I read your post, I think I figured it out. So, thanks
Traditional societies are either stagnant (see third world countries) or they fall apart, because future generations may not agree with rules set by the previous one.
You basically want a Christian Saudi-Arabia.
There are but they are changing, as they always have. You sound like some old fuck who's bitching about women being able to wear pants.
That's your argument to try and destroy tradition, culture and volk?
Better let those invaders into germany, right? Ahmed will empower us all! Diversity is strength!
I don't feel comfortable doing that in public too, but that's because I have always dated down and I'm ashamed to go out in public with them. I know I'm a piece of shit
Is volk still a thing?
you are legitimately a piece of shit
damn dude…
Yeah I know, just said I was. I'm actually legitimately OK with the girl I'm dating now, she has a 9/10 personality and a thicc body and I find her attractive, but I know most other people don't and I just can't live with that.
I guess my values are old-fashioned. There is change, but there is also—continuity. Improvement on the past rather than merely redefining everything in the light of the newest revelations of the mystic spirit of the social body.
But yes: If I want them to stay away from me—and if I can't make them leave, I'll obviously have to be the one to leave. I just hope I'll find a better way to do it than sudoku…
...
bitch we need less people having kids. it's capitalism that brings in immigrants because they have 10 kids to "grow the economy." Are you this stupid?
Homosexuality is legit spooky, as is gender
I didn't even think about such cases, but about animals fully capable of differentiating such things like most mammals.
There are incredibly many species fully capable of engaging in homosexual coupling "consciously" and homosexual acts "consensually".
Im half a homosexual myself and I hate faggots too.
Hating faggots and hating gays isnt the same thing, almost everybody hates faggots.
Key and peele video related youtube.com
Nice vid thanks
Ironically letting those "invaders" from traditionalist countries in may actually be the only chance for you to destroy the liberal states you hate so much and reinstall the traditional society you carve so much for.
Sure it won't be white and christian, but at least those fucking libruls get kekked, and admit it, this is what you really want.
You better not disrespect the Gram Parsons portraits we will hang in every city after the revolution if you don't want to spend your last days in a gulag.
You better pay your respects to the Gram Parsons portraits we will hang in every city after the revolution though, if you don't want to spend your last days in a gulag.
Gay men often adopt female vocal patterns subconsciously
Though obviously people like that are annoying as hell, there are allot of straight males and females who childishly flaunt their sexual exploits also
Delusional hypothetical, fampai. We're not dealing with two completely separated hypothetical societies, we're dealing with society as it is. Maybe 1 in 100 people are gay. If 1% of the population either not reproducing or doing via sperm donors is an immanent and deadly threat to your race, then somehow I think that your race has bigger problems than the 1% of gays. Your posited social scenario has absolutely nothing to do with the real world, because nobody's arguing here about whether or not the whole world should be gay. We're arguing about whether or not gays should be allowed to exist in society, and your whole notion that somehow they shouldn't because it'll reduce white breeding rates is the most useless shit I've seen in a long time. "Nature" has nothing at all to do with it.
Dubious. Companies do stuff because it's profitable. There's no larger 🍀🍀🍀agenda🍀🍀🍀 here. If being openly racist was profitable, they'd do it. As it stands, minorities have been increasingly successful at making your brand of bullshit unprofitable, so they don't. You're still free to say whatever you want, or in this case scream about degenerates on an imageboard, but your favourite corporations aren't going to pander to your particular agenda anymore. Don't like it? Maybe you should get interested in abolishing capitalism to preserve genuine culture.
I'd suggest Adorno.
Any modern conceptions of "tradition" in our current society have been overwhelmed by cynical political re-appropriations, capitalist greed, and distortions by edgelords disconnected from it. You'll notice that a Holla Forumsack can never actually engage with tradition as the kind of organic, evolving entity you describe. The most they can argue is a bunch of screaming about "ahmed", grainy reversions to modernist pseudo-science, and decontextualized pictures of statuary devoid of any real meaning to them.
They may call themselves traditionalists, but they're not really engaging with what tradition means - the engaging with the fundamental morality, worldview, and value system passed down from previous generations. You can understand someone else's tradition, but you can't jump back to the mindset of a 1900s German bourgeois any more than a fat greasy basement-dwelling Westerner could really become a daimyo. Tradition, in that sense, is more than just knowing - it's a lens through which you view the world.
Maybe you're actually seeing the world through that particular lens, and if you are I admire that completely. But you can't really just "restore traditions" - when Goethe and the Romantics decided to defend German traditions and culture, they ended up with something quite unlike the 15th-century worldview they tried to revive. And when Japan went nutty and fascist before WW2 and tried to restore the Samurai traditions, what they got was something entirely different than the shogunate-era individualist warrior code. You literally can't restore tradition when it's gone.
lmao go back to jacking off to hitler pics
If you live in the US there are plenty of places you can go. Pretty anyplace that isn't a big city. Even "liberal" states are heavily red outside suburbs. Even if you don't vote the way they do, you won't have to deal with crazy city faggots.
Well you seem to be making the assumption that anyone here has or cares about their "own people".
Second off your suggesting absurd fictions. It doesn't matter even if you try to force people, they won't just suddenly turn gay. Gays are such a small percentage of the population they don't impact birth rates much, and there are also plenty of barren or simply not child wanting straight people. I think it's funny how you present gay propaganda, yet you seem to believe it yourself. You're so afraid of a very small portion of the population just wanting to be left alone. You created this shit. Fighting against "the gays" to protect "your people", you turned them into an identity, a culture. If you would have just shrugged your shoulders and moved on with your life then they'd just be some sex-weirdos who don't really matter.
That text is way too long for the average rightwinger to read.
this is bait
He's not wrong though.
my "own people" is human beings. roughly 5% of them are gay, and we don't seem to be in any danger of extinguishing any time soon.
idpol gtfo
It's bourgeois decadence that couldn't exist in a genuinely communist society. It was born by Liberalism and has no roots in the Left.
Read your Engels.