George Soros and his son are killed after a bomb is attached to their limo

The same way they rationalize antisemitism with supporting Donald Trump.

That would imply there is anything there to explode.

He's Jewish and pro-immigration, what more do they need? The main reason they hate Communism is because they think it's a Jewish plot to destroy Hwytes.

That's funny, I would imagine a right wing group would do that as a false flag to install facism.

They'd probably be ecstatic, one of their enemies would be removed and the blame would fall completely onto another of their enemies.

Rationalize?
What's to rationalize?
"Soros is dead and as a bonus now feds around the world are going to stop ignoring antifa retards and letting them get away with whatever they want"
Literally the only better headline I could ever see than this is "Soros and his son are killed after a mob of 1000 communist terrorists all blew themselves up while surrounded by a crowd of nothing but various Marxists".

It's true, I hate it when I'm living my peaceful proletariat life and some screeching faggot comes in and kills all the shopowners and insists I am now "free" to live a good life in a hut made out of shit and that now no one will exploit me and I won't be taken advantage of but also everything I make or grow will be taken from me and I'll get a tiny fraction back because, you know, they care about the common man and all that, and then they kill like, more common people than Hitler and somehow retroactively spin it as the fault of those evil people who wanted to broker power in terms of money rather than blood.

"He faked his own death to hide his complicity in Pizzagate"

Does his death mean the death of the Esperanto movement as well?

nigger are you stupid

you can run a fucking shop so long as youre not paying a wage or trying to trade things for exchange values

This, fam, is what happens when your persecution complex muffles your ability to think critically.

uh no faggot, that did in fact happen for far less. stop being a revisionist faggot and own up to the catastrophes of your ideology

the greatest catastrophes of capitalism are producing autistic retards like you

read a book
read history
there's no revising here

They'd all laugh.
Then when the governments of the world are suddenly bearing down on left wing groups, killing and imprisoning self identified Socialists; they'd laugh some more.

With that said; move ahead with your plans.

Have anything to connect those thoughts, or are you just rambling incoherently?

Communism is white and redpilled.'

Leave him alone! Leave him alone!

I'd take a portion of the population being angry autists over Commisar Jamal taking me to the re-education camp after the government repossesses my farm.

This. Not a single conservative would lose a minute's sleep over Soros being killed. Many wish it would happen, but have legal and moral reasons for not acting to further that desire. The liberal boogiemen, the Koch brothers, would elicit a similar reaction. Real conservatives despise neocons ALMOST as much as you commie dirtbags.

You don't have very strong reading comprehension, do you?

lol

Do you support the president, yes, or no?

I want him to lead effectively, but I don't give him a blank check for any actions he might conceivably take. Am I glad he won over Hillary? 100%

And I was done with the Republican party, in 2014 I was gleefully looking forward to the collapse of Republicans so the two party system could be cleaned up. I hated McCain in 2008 (still think Obama was the better option) and felt pretty unimpressed with Romney in 2012 (debatable).

politico.com/story/2016/11/trump-koch-brothers-231863

I just told you they could be killed as posed in OP and I wouldn't give a shit. Of course massive donors have insidious ties to the current administration. Man, I wish Hillary got elected so we wouldn't have to worry about stuff like that…

You can't support the president if you claim to DESPISE neocons. It's pretty simple. If you support the John Bolton loving president in any way, you actually don't despise neocons.

...

Reading is probably a ((globalist🍀🍀🍀 trick anyway

So who did you vote for? Have you supported anybody in government ever? What are your ideologies? We're given a multiple choice question for who will rule, and if you don't voice your opinion you get what the other idiots chose. I never said Trump is infalliable or that I agree with all of his priorities. And since the hardcore neocons like McCain, Graham try to undermine his every move… yeah, I'm pretty sure I can support him. Even if that means he works with the neocons. Liberals are the masters of the slippery slope, they push for no societal norms and attack anybody who has a problem with it, presenting a unified front. The right is tired of you guys poking moralistic holes that ONLY WE would ever even care about. So we're unifying, just like you guys have for decades, because you focused solely on using the system to push your ideology to its very limits. Well, the left has reached those limits, and the majority is finally realizing how contrary they are to the present culture in the country.

Maybe you despise the Democrats, though being Holla Forums I'd wager you support them in at least a general sense. Either way, they've been doing some things through pretty sketchy means, and enough people are up in arms about it to "step backwards" socially in order to regain sanity. It's a very reactionary movement, and when you're reaching to sometone to save you from a present danger, you can't be really picky about who you allow to save you.

...

Your grasp of this site is impressive

Thanks newfriend, you'll learn soon enough too

youtube.com/watch?v=nVNQ13f4qzM
You guessed wrong

So if you don't support the Democrats, you shouldn't have had any problem with Trump winning the presidency? At least, you didn't care for any viable alternative to him.

Where was that on the ballot on November 8th? The write-ins? C'mon, son. Following quote still applies whether it's two shitty choices, two good choices, or a shitty choice and a good choice.

Though if you guys are diametrically opposed to voting, I'm not really going to work that hard to change your minds, because that's exactly the kind of margins that allowed Trump to win. It's called a civic duty for a reason, but most leftists confuse that with taxation.

I actually am glad that Trump won, because Hillary was potentially competent enough (or at least the liberal apparatus surrounding her) to keep up the Obama style complacency that permeated the culture and prop up this rotting joke of a system that is our financial system and institutions. Trump lays bear the ugly truth of the office he holds and the system it represents, and has helped create a real current of unrest and disease in the usual placated masses.

Of course, you'll recognize that this "preference" to his unbalanced, erratic flailing over the corrupt, controlled parasitism on the working class of a potential Hillary continuation of the existing order is hardly a ringing endorsement of Trump's policies. But it is necessary.

In that way he really has been a unifier. His supporters have from the start been calling to draw blood from the government, cutting it back, and his detractors are aspiring to be even more obstructionist than the Obama congresses. A period of pain to cleanse the parasites is very common throughout history, and it is very possible that Trump doesn't come through it unscathed. The hopes have to be that enough people have been disillusioned enough by then to not let TPTB put their shit back in place and get back to getting away with everything as usual. Left or right.

I don't know the best path forward, if the parties need to move more centrist or if we as a country have just ceased being able to make a two-party system work. The latter really scares me, because that will be almost impossible to fully change and flesh out, as anybody who holds elected office has a vested interest in maintaining that status quo, even if it's grinding our productivity to a halt. And even if we did have a few graciously benevolent actors, the deep state would have mechanisms to ensure their dissent is smoothed over at various points in the process.

What we need is for new avenues/outlets of power to be brought up to challenge the old ones outside of the traditional power structures in this country and in western society in general. Of course it's scary, which is why answers within the current system like Hillary-style technocratic liberalism ("Everything's working just fine i swear!" and Trump style tantrum against the very concept of change ("Things are bad now, let's just go back to how things were before! Pay no attention to the past leading to the present by definition") are the obvious go to answers.

But I'm telling you that a broken system just can't be fixed from within that system. I do give credit to Trump supporters for at least recognizing that there IS a problem. But that's just not enough.

lol no one is afraid of you

To be fair, he was a lot more anti-establishment up to the day of his inauguration. Which shouldn't have surprised anybody tbh. But there are no easy avenues for total structural change to our political institutions, so it's understandable why people want to be able to vote the problem away so badly. I do think that the system will be softened up by Trump's election, there is room for some serious disruptions to the status quo the next election cycles. I almost wish he was limited to one term so 2020 wouldn't be a referendum on Donald Trump, but on our path forward as a country. It would pressure the Democrats to develop a strategy more meaningful than "Stop Drumpf", which will be the meat of their message in 2020, which might or might not be enough. Either way, 2024 will be a sight to behold. I wonder if we'll have any open rebellions forcefully put down by then.

Easy.

Conspiracies are beyond rationalization.

(checked)
This is how Holla Forums would react. You think they care about some commie rhetoric message if one of the leading forces behind globalization is removed?