It took 4 years knowing there was a problem for Obama to say the water was bad in flint, and it took 67 days for Trump to replace the pipes.
It took 4 years knowing there was a problem for Obama to say the water was bad in flint...
Truly Trump is /ourguy/
I didn't expect anything else.
Good tbh. This is left-liberals biggest fear; that Trump will accomplish what Obama ignored.
But it was Obama who authorised the money going to Flint now. Not saying he was an effectual leader because wow, he wasn't, but let's not make things up now.
No he is not our guy.
Also, where is your proofs billy?
...
Y'all better be trollin'
Obama was bad, Trump is bad, Clinton is bad, they all bad. If you think otherwise you're a fuckin' idiot.
There is still a gigantic problem with pipes across the entire fucking nation
America has a global infrastructure rating of fucking D+.
If he can raise it even above a fucking C I'll be mildly impressed. Not impressed enough to respect the position he literally planned shoe horning himself in, his entire life as power fantasy.
Not that Clinton is any different.
The moment you become president, run for president, you lose any and all respect from the public you think earned or deserved.
And the fact is, Flint was going on for a very long time before Obama. Again, all over the United States
detroitnews.com
Trump is probably going to close or at least defund the EPA so yeah, good luck getting any more money to fix anything
He's only going to cut the parts related to climate science I think.
That is still a bad thing
Meh, all their regulations are opposed by big business so I wouldn't be surprised if he totally closed it down. Trump is basically the most overtly corrupt president America has had yet, he doesn't even bother with the usual charade.
Oh and before you say that the EPA was established by Nixon and some Republicans might object to this, Alaska's GOP just legalised hunting bear cubs and wolves while they hibernate on federal land, so I think modern conservatives have chosen to take an actively anti-environment stance.
yeah, opposed by all the businesses that don't own the patents
I don't think there's a patent on not venting toxic chemicals into aquifers.
Why would fixing water require the whole EPA?
its no more corrupt to take managing the state according to specific personal business interests than it is to manage the state according to business interests that paid you off via lobbyists tbh
It doesn't require the whole EPA but when you do shut down the whole thing you are by definition also shutting down the water-fixing parts
Like I said, overtly.
oh wow, this is pretty good news.
so much for "he isn't getting anything done".
but flint is just a minor water disturbance compared to all the other lead poisoning across the US.
reuters.com