Why do commies have a problem with white tribalism but encourage non-white tribalism, ala the black panthers, etc

Why do commies have a problem with white tribalism but encourage non-white tribalism, ala the black panthers, etc

You know these non-white nationalist alleged 'communist' groups are mirror images of white nationalists, right? We wuz kangz, Jakub, black god, and sho on.

If let's say in South Africa if a black capitalist elite took over and there were a bunch of racist white Not Socialists (who were economically communist) that fought the South African black capitalist government for self determination as a race/ethnic group while also advocating socialism, would you support that?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Panther_Party
libcom.org/library/nationalism-“national-question”-murray-bookchin
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

...

DECOLONIZE YOUR MIND.
YOUR TOOTHBRUSH IS THE TOOTHBRUSH OF FOLKS OF COLOR.

Try again, cuck.

All tribalism is cancer. Also the black panthers weren't identitarians, they were just anti-racist. They allowed white people to join.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Panther_Party

Your toothbrush is made of plastic. The plastic is made of oil. The oil comes from Africa and the Middle East. They will come to take it back soon enough bucko.

...

You're paying attention to the hypocrites.

libcom.org/library/nationalism-“national-question”-murray-bookchin

the black panthers were not not nationalists. they arose to defend blacks from police brutality. they just wanted their rights

They gave up on nationalism early in their career and openly opposed racism by blacks as well as non-blacks, which put them on black nationalists' shit list.

Read a book.

because black nationalists arent a bunch of fucking limp dick faggots

Fair point, but Kurds are a bit different from what we experienced with the totally-not-third-world-right-wingers-:^) since they are both pretty socially liberal and pro-democratic(at least for for the middle eastern standards) which is why everybody from many ML to Anarchists is so supportive of them. I mean, there are Spanish Hoxhaists in the international battalion and it's one of the best proofs of their legitimacy as leftists I could think of.

Why are commushits always such shit for brains denying basic facts as they stare them right in the face?

These organizations were from a time when de facto segregation was still common. It was largely pragmatic, and would be hard to justify today.

And I am as opposed to them as I am to Nazis. Many SJWs would attest these people can't be racist because "they are oppressed". You will actually hear SJWs say you cannot be racist if you are not experiencing "white priviledge".

But first off you are conflating SJWs with Leftists. Yea obviously I oppose oppression in all forms. But I, and many others here, aren't self-hating non-white nationalists.

Keep that in mind the next time you march in solidarity with BLM and ghetto baboons beat you up and rob you just for being white.

stopped reading there

We are not lib… fuck it, no point.

But we hate both equally you disingenuous fag. Sage for not reading the FAQ and strawmanning.

...

google I N T E R S E C T I O N A L I T Y

That black nationalist story is literally Rambo

OP if you are talking about the nazis then the answer is in the question.
if you are not talking about the nazis then i have no idea what you are talking about.
obviously i'm not wasting my time reading whatever bs you wrote.

The point is they allowed and accepted white involvement in their movement, and worked together with groups like the IWW and young patriots. They were hardly identitarians in the same sense that white nationalists were.

the YPG and PKK aren't marxist

Dumb cumskin

We don't. Nationalists of all kinds go up against the wall.

Its like you hate to evolve

Of course not.