Why the hell does the democratic party support open borders amidst U.S. overpopulation...

Why the hell does the democratic party support open borders amidst U.S. overpopulation, and overproduction of nat resources such as oil?

Such a move would explicitly lower the gdp per capita, increase the racial/wage gap and increase poverty. Doesn't sound very liberal to me.

Maybe you should ask >>>/liberalpol/

Lower birthrates in current population of US create a demand for increase in workforce therefor immigration is needed.

Expansion of industry and natural resources is also necessary to keep economy growing so it can support the needs that population has.

...

...

But our population growth rate is too high.

You ARE lowering the gdp per capita to raise gdp. The only people that benefit are rich white men and corporations.

ftfy
That's the literal justification for perpetual growth.

1.) not an argument and red hearing
2.) As evidenced by Somalia and Syria weapons in hands of proletariat can and will turn into detrimental factor without organization supporting them.

Capital isint some finite resource, pls read Marx.

beyond retarded

Not really, considering that Soviets were disarmed by the red army during the Russian and Chinese civil wars, as independent militias without central control could and in some cases did turn against the revolution and her leadership.

Initial weapons are the least of your concerns. See cold war Afghanistan.

theres nothing right about that, fuckers in power disarmed independent soviets

liberals are basically porky worshippers plus racial or other idpol types of guilt.

immigration benefits porky by undercutting wages and setting the migrant workers against the locals and also satisfies their desire to be multicultural and 'accepting'

So are you denying their de-facto effect or just arguing that it is a minimalist factor?

There is nothing right about their opportunism neither.

That it'd be minimal. The enemy of your revolution will never be the locals of peasant countries.

Marx ain't infaillible m8, the rarefaction of ressources is a pretty recent concern.

You clearly don`t understand the nature of capital or how it is resource of its own.

>>>/anarchy/

Maybe if they hadn't disarmed the workers the USSR and PRC wouldn't have become repressive tankie shitholes.

Yes, they could have become reactionaries and formed more green armies instead!

Maybe if the Soviet state had actually protected the interests of the workers then they wouldn't have turned against the government.

This is literally "Is it possible that we have betrayed the working class and the cause of socialism by robbing the workers of their political power and creating a new ruling class? No, it's the workers and peasants who are wrong."

Soviet leadership had popular support among urban workers where as the reactionary stroke of peasantry lead to their anti-Bolshevik sentiment.

Then why did the Bolsheviks disarm the urban workers too?

Reactionaries like makhno or the kronstadters?

Because the democrats are a bourgeois party you dumb idiot

because they're psychopaths who involve themselves with actual satanic practices and attend organized cult meetings with other prominent public figures where they engage in rituals that require things you get from humans to work.


you are supplies to them at worst, a fucktoy at best.

Bullshit, there are millions of Americans out of work. Stop lying.

Question should be why did they arm them in the first place. Red army should have been their priority.

Did I clam that there would be full employment under capitalism at any point?

...

Do you really expect liberals to make rational choices?

Mostly they get immigrants to take on debt and tax them to pay pensions. They also will work for $2 an hour because they can't exactly sue their employer for violating labor laws.

Increasing the supply of low-skilled labor does drive down wages for low-skill natives, but liberals pretty explicitly argue that this is for the greater good, in that the lives of Mexicans are improved by a greater amount than Americans' are worsened.

Because only armed workers can overthrow capitalism? The point remains, if your so called workers state is worried about workers rising up against it then it isn't a worker's state. The surest sign of a degenerated socialist state is when it begins to fear armed workers, and if that happens then it's too far gone and the workers should overthrow it anyway.

literally wat

go away shillery

is there a name for this specific kind of stupidity?

Let me explain this again retards.

Lrn 2 thermodynamics cuck

Except it isnt

that was retarded because we all know money is not a problem you just need to tax porky.

fucking newfag go back to reddit or lurk the fuck more

Except this guy bumped it

Besides you have no right to complain when we have that antifa thread with over 380 replies

...

If only there was some mechanism under capitalism whereby the price of a commodity increased since demand grew or remained static while supply was reduced.

I can't think of what we'd call such a mechanism for describing the relationship between the supply of a commodity and the demand for the aforementioned commodity, expressed partially through the price of the aforementioned commodity.

Nope, can't think of anything. Obviously since wages will remain static under this system of commodifying labor, immigration is the only possible response.