If Chomsky were to appear on Sargon's show for a debate, who would win...

If Chomsky were to appear on Sargon's show for a debate, who would win? What kind of tactics would Sargon be pulling off?

It's time to stop

vs

gee really makes them synapses swell up huh

Reminder that Chomsky already went on O N E DO L L A R M A N and blew him the fuck out

Chomsky gets some hate on this board but even having this discussion is a joke.

I guess I'd wanna see it just so Carl finally kills himself, but i'm sure he'll still convince himself he won

Sargon would just autistically repeat one factoid over and over again like he does in every debate.

Chomsky's an old man with declining energy.
I want to see someone like Mark Blyth or Dean Baker coldly dismantle one of these alt-right youtube shitters.

Shoutouts to Chomsky. He'll debate anyone.

Chomsky's debating is like Superman taking a slow stroll through a building. Sure he may win technically and come out the other side, but he lacks the gravitas to excite people.

Dig up that Sam Harris - Chomsky fight. That's what would happen. Harris being way out of his league and Chomsky refusing to humor Harris.

Chomsky is just a fucking liberal maggot.
fuck him and fuck sargoon

Sargon is at his 'best' when he's rambling endlessly about dumb shit in the news. He's not really equipped to talk with somebody who doesn't agree with him, let alone "debate" somebody. Dude got blown away by perennial idiot Kristi Winters ffs. Chomsky, whatever you think of him, versus Carl would be like throwing a baby off a balcony.

Go to bed kid, you've got school tomorrow.

Sargon has lost debates to the right stuff shitposters as well as a literal sjw.

Loudly yelling "OH FUCKING HELL ARE YOU SERIOUS?"

Not even, he just got lectured like a child. There wasn't enough contention from him to call it a debate

This. It doesn't matter what anyone says to him in a debate, he'll never admit to having lost no matter how badly he got owned. He's pretty slick when it comes to bullshitting. Even if the right fell out of favor, he'd start pandering to someone else and many of his fans would follow suit. While Chomsky may dissuade a few people from following him, it wouldn't be the crushing blow we want or need.

This reminds me of that one screenshot that got posted here a while ago where Sargon said his politics were like Noam Chomsky.
If the two ever actually debated Sargon would just ignore everything Chomsky says and babble on for an hour about video game politics and social justice justice warriors. That's the only thing he ever talks about.

didn't he say he was "overprepared" when Kristi Winters (or whoever the Gender studies Dr was) and thats why he lost?

What an asshole, actually listening to that guy for like 3 months remains my greatest shame.

Sargon is the worst live debater. He got BTFO by Kristi Winters (who's a fucking idiot btw). What do you think would happen if he debated someone who actually knows what they're talking about?

Can we stop talking about that retarded liberal faggot Sargon on this board

...

Agreed

...

the idea that he actually prepared for that debate is hilarious

I don't remember that. Of course, if you brought that up to him he'd say his opinions have changed.


Believe me, I wish we could do that. Unfortunately, the reality is that he holds a large amount of sway, much larger than he deserves. We're going to have to either discredit him or get him to change his views at some point, and the sooner we can do that the better.

First off, we need to assemble a compilation of all the times he's fucked up. I read something on here about him turning off a stream when he accidentally opened a socialist video that he thought was SJW and his viewers started agreeing with it. I don't have the source for that, but that type of thing is what we need to show people.

Second, if we could actually get Chomsky to debate him that would be great. TBH though I don't know if even Chomsky is prepared for the level of deflection Sargon is capable of. And again, many of Sargon's viewers will probably defend him no matter what. There were plenty of people saying JonTron won that debate with Destiny even though Destiny fucking crushed him, and JonTron more or less admitted it. I don't have a solution for that right off the top of my head. Any takers?

Well he utterly destroyed Stefanie Manure.

It's a personality cult at this point. Almost all opinions-tube channels are, really, once a viewer watches for long enough and puts doubts about the presenter enough times. With personality cults, you can't use reason to dissuade fanatics. So maybe that's the question we should be asking, how does one Holla Forums topple a personality cult?

On the Internet and only on the fucking Internet. Most of his followers are social pariahs too.

...

How indeed.


The internet is the primary communications medium of the whole world. It's pretty fucking important.

You highly overestimate how far a reach Sargon has. You could ask 1000 people on the street and you'd be lucky if 1 knew who he was.

...

Because people who watch sargon don't go outside

His video on how The Young Turks are falling apart (they are) got over a million views. His video on the media being the enemy of the people (they are, but not for the reasons he thinks) got over half a mil. Even if you take multiple views into account that's still several hundred thousand people. Getting even a quarter of them to turn left would be a huge boon. And what would it hurt to try? We all know the Chom has the chops to chew up Sargon.

people who collect their "knowledge" and "political expertise" from youtubers dont go outside

leftcoms probably have hammocks for sunny days

One million views isn't even that impressive by YouTube standards anymore. That's the fraction of a Justin Bieber video. Should Chomsky debate Bieber? Sargon isn't high profile enough to be anywhere on Chomsky's radar and debating Sargon would only raise Sargon's profile. It's not as though getting wrecked in a debate would kill Sargon's fanbase, like said, he has personality cult that will follow him to the end. His audience would go into the debate already biased against Chomsky (that is if they're even aware of who he is).

I hate The Young Turks and that genocide denier, Cenk, but didn't they have a huge fundraising campaign after the election that gave them enough money to hire a second full time film crew for their TYT Politics channel?

What you want is like a round table of different intellectuals from different backgrounds having a discussion like adults and plonk cuckad or molymeme there to be shown up for the mental midgets they are.
Make the gulf between genuine academics and these charlatans as starkly obvious as possible.

Chomsky is old and bored. He debated Molymeme of all people.

For a political video, a million views is amazing. Donald Trump's inauguration only got something like 10 million and he's the US President.

As for Sargon's profile, didn't that happen with Sam Harris and Chomsky? Chomsky BTFO Sam Harris but he just kind of pretended it never happened. But what about Molyneux? Some of the people who saw him get rekt by Chomsky may be posting here now. It's kind of a tradeoff. You can gain and lose from it.

You know what, maybe we should email Chomsky and ask him whether he thinks it's wise.


TBH most "genuine academics" are also frauds.

Thanks for bringing that up, that somehow flew by me. I just read through the exchange and it is absolutely brutal. Harris must be a masochist, or him publishing this carnage on his own website is simply the obvious result of him being a narcissistic idiot.

I think he honestly thinks he won the debate. I can't otherwise explain him publishing it himself.

Terrible shitpost OP, be ashamed of yourself.

he'd just call him ssshhhhhhttuupid, laugh at him, scratch his beard/balls, then act like he won, all while eating pizza rolls.

πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€pizza rollsπŸ€πŸ€πŸ€

What is that?

a thread died for this

Could you post a link please? I'm not familiar with all of these memetubers.

I guess that's a compliment

This is like asking what would happen inf God Zilla went up against giraffe. Chomsky has literally spent like 90 years reading and writing and lecturing at universities and Sargon is a fat 30 something college drop out who makes shitty, dishonest YouTube videos and exploit's people's hunger for outrage news.

This meme needs to die. Credentialist bullshit has no place in the left movement. The amount of merit you have should be solely based on how well you can support your claims. That said, beating Sargon in that department isn't difficult.

I think Sargon will do ok, he's improved at debating a lot and he destroyed the leftist cuck destiny

Maybe it wouldn't even be an aggressive debate and more like a normal interview. Given that Chomsky is for free speech and not nostalgic about the Soviet Union and Sargon knows that, and also given that Chomsky doesn't like some aspects of leftwing academia (pomo twats), it could happen that they would be mostly agreeing with each other, depending on what they talk about, no?

But maybe, this could happen:
A: And the reason for that problem is capitalism.
B: What you mean is crony capitalism.
A: Capitalism.
B: Crony capitalism.
A: Capitalism.
B: Crony capitalism.
(five hours later)
A: C A P I T A L I S M.
B: C R O N Y capitalism.

A butt