What's your flag, comrades?

What's your flag, comrades?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=GMIg4ntOMJU
theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-the-truth-about-primitive-life-a-critique-of-anarchoprimitivism
o9a.org/o9a-and-anarchy/
learn.esperanto.com/en/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

...

Life is good.

...

...

I'd like to report some counter-revolutionaries to the NKVD.


Best flag

uphold Luxemburgism

sounds about right

...

He thinks Russia is still Communist.

Right wingers love that idiot.

That's not what the pink-and-black flag means! We are going to appropriate and collectivize the lolis of reproduction.

Only red, green and orange are acceptable, prove me wrong.

pro tip: you can't.

ANARCHIST POWER RANKINGS

Red > Orange > White > Green > Purple > Pink

I think we can winnow away all of them except for the red and black one.

Anarcho-fascism has the best flag.

...

Orange and Green flags definitely

I'm not an anarchist, for example I'm fine with police, but I don't want an overbearing totalitarian government either. I have been told I'm a Classical Marxist, Anarcho-Communist, and even Bookchinite, but none of those seem to really align with what I believe.

Literally what even?

how are anarchists so bad at presenting themselves

...

Every day we stray further from God's light.

Anything other than red or black is a meme.

The only flag that could make anarchism actually work.

Red is okay, but would be better without the black.
Green are idealists and often veer toward misanthropy.
Orange doesn't understand economics.
Purple and Pink are hedonistic narcissists.
White are babies and objectively pro-Fascist.

Reminds me of these.

...

youtube.com/watch?v=GMIg4ntOMJU

Strong government that forces people to be free.
It's the only [utopia] that works.

Where's Anarcho-Pacifism, Anarcho-Militarism, Anarcho-Monarchism and Anarcho-Clericalism?

flags are for fags

they all get thrown in a wood chipper

Why can't we just get along?

The greenies and the mutualists can live, but they have to agree not to nuke the planet or restart capitalism.

...

Where's my anarcho-loli flag, BO?

kinda annoying that the syndicalist flair got removed but I still gotta check the greenie vs primmie flairs

greenies are meh
primmies are retarded

He does some solid gun reviews though, all I give a shit about.

I'm a pirate and I do what ever I want.

Toppest kek.

You got that reversed, greenies are spooked retards who idolize earth and are often misanthropes. While the primmes realize that the further humans live from the condition they evolved for the unhappier they become, even though there's a lot of incredibly spooked retards among them who literally want to deny anything special or unique about humans and reduce us to literal grunting apes.

Read Kaczynski.

Pink and purple is literally just idpol trying to legitimize itself and pretend it has the same level of theory or history as the other flags.


Don't bully whites. They have their heart in the right place and have a unique and truly different praxis. Unfortunately, they're ultimately just hippies shot by the trigger-happy National Guard.

you first

theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-the-truth-about-primitive-life-a-critique-of-anarchoprimitivism

Syndicalist flag got removed?

Same here brother. Smoke if you got em and I know you've got em!

well we had another red/black flair that was named Anarcho-Syndicalist

smoke em if you got em
and drink your glasses to the bottom

I forget to mention the primitivists who idealize hunter-gather life and think it was some liberal paradise. The movement as a whole is probably salvageable, but the theory is definitely solid.

We need a communalist flag already.

lmao no

nice argument fagtron you sure convinced me with those hot opinions

That's the YPG flag. You already have one. If we want to be really serious about flags (which have become excuses to shitpost at times), then the ancom flag should be the one for ansyns, etc.

Did you mean to say "not salvageable"? I haven't read their theory, but a cursory glance at the movement itself gives the impression of irredeemable retardation likely stemming from hippies seriously taking their ideology to its logical conclusion.

nice spooks retard go ahead and prove how unhappiness exists because I'm not one with some shitty abstract idea of a collection of earthly resources

nature doesnt exist


nah user wants us to take them seriously

Ya, I meant to save not salvageable. The movement is pretty much cancer that's likely never read Kaczynski.

This is neither a result of evolution nor a static preference across humanity

Just like it's not a result of evolution that animals show obvious signs of depression from being in cages and artificial environments or literally go insane from the stress and the boredom, leading to stereotypy and ravaging?

Even disregarding the unhappiness, standpoint, the extent that technology has fucked shit up, continually lessen human freedom, and constantly introduced new problems after solving previous ones is enough for the primitivist position.

are you sure you're not exactly the same as every other hippie retard on the planet
we are not penguins
we are not caged monkeys

guns dont kill people, people kill people
tools and knowledge are not the problem, ever

result of hierarchy, not technology


the primitivist position is literally nothing then
the very idea that problems wouldnt exist without modern tech is ludicrous

Absolutely not an argument. To say that humans are somehow so evolved they have evolved past the evolved natures other animals possess is ridiculous. Animals clearly respond negatively to artificial and limiting environments, why would humans not also?
Literally read Kazcynski. It has nothing to do with how humans use technology, but the impact the technology simply existing has on humanity.
Never said problems wouldn't exist, but probably significantly less without technology. I said primitivist theory is solid, not that it's perfect or that eliminating modern technology is possible or desirable.

top reactionary


nonsense mysticism

You're misusing "muh human nature". It's a meme when someone tries to use it as a priori justification "just human nature bro, it's the way it has to be". It's absurd to say it doesn't exist when all other animals clearly display a unique set of behaviors, humans among them. Again, if animals respond negatively to artificial environments, why wouldn't humans? We obviously haven't had time to evolve and adapt to the modern world; we are the same as hunter-gatherers 10,000 years ago.
R E A D K A Z C Y N S K I

Only flag that matters. Mutualists, some of you are alright

WTF is with anarchists and their snowflake identification with colors.

It's like you fucker's version of Tumblr pronouns

I'm a free market anarchist who takes his inspiration from American individualist anarchists and left-wing interpretations of ancap works. I'd use the black and yellow because I personally see my ideas as an extension of liberalism more than socialism. It's a shame that the black and yellow is used by the worst elements of capitalist apologists and alt-right fascists.

Anarchist- Heathenry

Yes we are. But I agree with the rest of your post.

See

Anarchy is an extremely diverse movement, containing people with different beliefs, goals, means, and priorities, many of which are mutually exclusive. In a intellectually and practically diverse movement such as anarchy, it'd be strange if different parts of the movement didn't use completely different symbolism. (It's a miracle that we even all agree on the black flag, considering how many different anarchies anarchists work towards.)

Why no flag por Anarcho- Harpo Marxism?

Red and gold to represent my weird ideology

Marxist Anarchism

fight me

no, fight me

You're missing some dank dudes.

Let's share that color combination together

I don't get why you guys don't accept us as anarchists when we want to dismantle the state as much as you do

because praxeology is magical thinking and your definition of capitalism and statism is different from everyone else's

Because you want to replace it with quasi-states; you're perfectly okay with laws and rulers if the justification is based upon property rights instead of democracy, social contract, or divine right of kings. You're not anarchists because you don't believe in anarchy, an equal and free society without rulers; at best you could just be called anti-statists.

DON'T👏CALL👏YOURSELF👏ANARCHIST👏IF👏YOU👏DON'T👏WANT👏TO👏ABOLISH👏THE👏ECONO-IDEOLOGICAL👏SOURCE👏OF👏HIERARCHY

Whaaaaaat? Communists are the ones that want to restrict people's liberty.

If there's no private property, and everything is decided by a group, then there's no liberty for anyone. The word personal property is usually used to place some vague limit on how much property you're allowed to own, "you can't own a factory" and such. It's not really liberty if a group can come along and declare your sewing machine is private property rather than personal, so you have to hand it over. Private property places clear limits on the use of finite resources, which encourages investment and reduces conflict. Personal property (or anti-property) does the opposite.

Terrible flag, this is the one I meant to use.

Because anarchism is about dismantling hierarchy. The State is only part of this, not the whole thing. Capitalism is inherently hierarchical (employer - employee) thus not compatible with a current that wants to dismantle hierarchy such as anarchism.

You can amass as much property as you want with your own (specifically your own) labor. If you don't want to chill out in a comfy commune, having your bros watch your back and you watch theirs, while everyone works together and shares the fruits of their labor, and would rather spend time by yourself in the forest trying to make the biggest house you can, then that's fine by me. Without the state, Capitalism and its defining features couldn't exist, so there's no need to restrict anyone's liberty.

See, ancaps are sometimes referred to with quotes around the "anarcho" or "capitalist" part. Either because they're actual anarchists who are ignorant about capitalism, or they're actual capitalists ignorant or deceiving about the anarchist part. If all you want is exactly the same economic system that exists, with massive wealth disparities, people dying because they're too poor for food or medicine, people working as wage-laborers and even in sweatshops, all of which was created and maintained with state violence, but you just want to "destroy" the state by privatizing its functions, then you're not really an anarchist. If instead you don't mind the property of the bourgeoisie being expropriated by the people it was stolen from, and you want a society built on voluntary interaction and you think markets are optimal for that, then you're not really a capitalist.

WHERE'S ANMON?

Now look at this flag that I just found

You are seriously making an argument based on human nature.

You ruined your own troll by forgetting your shitposting flag. Be more careful next time.

No, I'm using the human nature meme correctly. You're implying there exists behaviour inherent to us that we havent evolved out of. It's literally the same fucking thing as ancaps and competition.


Literally not how evolution works at all. Read Darwin, dumbass.

There is nothing solid about primmie garbage at all

my flag

Nice Hitler dubs. Still, I can prove you wrong.

doesnt prove anything wrong n00blet

...

Esperantist Anarchist reporting in.
I associate with the red flag, along with the fact that the workers need a universal language that is actually easy to learn and not tied with imperialism and the cultural hegemony of the United States.
We need a people's Latin, be it Esperanto or whatever is chosen democratically at the end.

Would a game of 4d chess have been a more fair test?

...

never ever pedo faggot
don't use anarchy as bullshit for your pedoshit

What the fuck is wrong with you anarkiddies and your snowflake obsession with having your own colors? It's like your version of Tumblr pronouns!

We've​ got 8 different flags to accommodate you and half of them are complete meme ideologies.

Anarcho-whateverism needs to die

ANARCHO-POSADISM WILL WIN

I see my flag has been conveniently forgotten, but then again it doesn't matter either way

Here you go buddy

...

What about a system that favors the many at the cost of a few?

Also why is this being framed by a victim mentality "muh oppression"?


No I fucking don't. This pic is gay. I don't give a shit about "inequality" and humanist ideas like ending suffering. I care about the environment not humans.

Also I anarcha-feminists aren't about equality they're about female supremacy.


This is a completely bullshit term. Pacifists are submissive cucks who implicitly support the status-quo.

Also, very convenient of you leaving out anarcho-nihilists because it contradicts the egalitarian humanist agenda you're pushing.

This doesn't make sense when has this ever existed anywhere? There's a lot of monarchies in Africa which are in a somewhat anarchic state but… anarchy and monarchy are complete opposites.

me tbh

Those ones are retarded. I idolize it as more of a mad-max constant-war kind of thing.

No they're just objectively status-quo, whatever the status-quo is. They like the status quo so much they refuse to actually resist it.

Why don't we just call "anarcho-communists" communists, anarcho-capitalists "capitalists", anarchoprimitivists "primitivists" or "greens", anarcoh-transhumanists "transhumanists", anarcho-feminists "feminists", and anarcho-fascists "fascists"?

Prefixing anarcho onto stuff is kind of silly.

Why?

How does it change the meaning of anything?

What's the difference between a primitivist / green vs an "anarchoprimitivist"?

I don't understand how an "anarcho-communist" is any different from a communist.

Likewise with all that other shit.

Why not add an ONA flag btw? Would you call it "Anarcho-Satanist"? Better to just call it ONA.

o9a.org/o9a-and-anarchy/

I'm making an argument that it exists and that it affects us. Again, it's a meme because it's used as a priori justification without actually explaining anything.
uwot. Humans haven't significantly evolved in the past 10,000 years, that's a fact. Behaviorally modern humans are over 100,000 years old.

People usually just call anprims "primitivists". Transhumanism is a wide ideology and most aren't anarchists. Marxists are also communists, but they have a radically different way of achieving it.

Mia kamarado.

Not the best flag tbh. Maybe just replace the green star with a similar sized green "A", maybe one more stylized and less blocky.

Isn't Esperanto basically just Spanish/Portuguese/Italian?

They're similar. Esperanto's grammar is simply more straight-forward with no exceptions.
learn.esperanto.com/en/

It's very fast to learn. However, it's mostly spoken by the Chinese and Eastern Europeans.

Spot on mate!

It's vocabulary takes from many European languages; English, German, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Russian, etc. But the grammar is completely unique and very logical and consistent.

Thanks mate

YOU are my comrade.

What should we call it?

...

I thought DeLeonism was the ultimate dead ideology?

liberal anarchists need to be drawn and quartered

thanks user, felt my tumors shrinking there for a sec

Libertarian Socialism?

Anarcho-Titoism

...

Supposedly, prehistoric hunter-gatherers who occupied fertile country must have worked far less than recent hunter-gatherers living in deserts or other unproductive environments. [33]


t. kaczynski

...

National Humanism