What do you think of Jordan Peterson? aka le redpill professor xd

what do you think of Jordan Peterson? aka le redpill professor xd
Has anyone debunked him yet?
youtube.com/watch?v=0o87c5eVuK4

Other urls found in this thread:

torontoist.com/2016/12/are-jordan-petersons-claims-about-bill-c-16-correct/
youtube.com/watch?v=O-nvNAcvUPE
youtube.com/watch?v=JDvj6DQd93o
grsj.arts.ubc.ca/persons/mary-bryson/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

interesting video, but i don't get your point, what's the "redpill" part ? and what's there to debunk?

redpill in the reddit sense of the word. Like men becoming confident/PUA types.
He has many videos where he just states things without evidence and I'd like to see someone criticize him.

this is the fuck who gets triggered then you use "they" pronouns

A JUST-tier idiot who took the opportunity to become a demagogue for neoreactionaries on the subject of muh pronouns bullshittery.

He's arguing from a country that made it illegal to call somebody by the pronoun they do not prefer. This is identity politics and language policing, literally, so how can you argue in favor of it?

Its arguably harassment.

Its like if a woman got a divorce, and changed her last name back to her maiden name. If you continue to call her Mrs. [Ex's Last name] you are being a giant asshole.

He's a dumb autist

Yes, I would be giant asshole, but that's protected by the government under freedom of speech (or should be). It's not like I am chasing her down in the street calling her Mrs. Smith or waking her up in the middle of the night with phone calls whispering something she doesn't want to hear. If you have the ability to ignore the other person and be physically safe, then I don't see any issue with some asshole who won't adhere to your moral code for speech.

Do you have any limits to free speech? Like do you think its ok if you called a person in real life by "bitch" pronouns all the time?

Another FREEZE PEACH autist who capitalized on the PC/anti-PC climate.

No, I don't. For that matter, I don't think it's ok to call somebody by their not preferred pronoun either. But that's the beauty of it; whether or not I think it's ok is irrelevant. If you call everybody by bitch pronouns or whatever, you are left with no friends. You will be punished for it, just not by the government. It's the same with regards to gender pronouns.

Do you think everything that's not OK should be illegal?

a Professor who is incapable of thinking, how sad. Just like Tugan-Baranovsky

i still can't see whats wrong in this video

Who cares? Seriously? The world will be a better place when schools all are just rubble.

...

You too can be an alt-right intellectual in just three easy steps.

The meme that the Canadian govt. is trying to outlaw misgendering people is total bullshit.(It is worrying that some people seem to endorse this though>>1468253
). This guy is just your run-of-the-mill reactionary veiling his hateful beliefs behind "muh free speech."

torontoist.com/2016/12/are-jordan-petersons-claims-about-bill-c-16-correct/

Peterson's problem with C-16 is almost certainly the fact that its making trans-gendered people a protected class. I personally think trans people are deluded but they're not hurting anyone (besides themselves) and they do face a lot of violence. Peterson is just a fucking right-wing zealot he tries to pull the I'm just a reasonable centrist angle but if you read/watch enough of his stuff his true nature shines through. I remember him claiming in an article that Women in the past never faced oppression because of their gender. A lot of modern day feminism is retarted but anyone who believes that is clearly fucked in the head.

Now if only Peterson took that sort of moderate stance instead of sperging out he might be actually worth listening to

No.

You make a good point, I suppose you're right about Peterson and the bill (I should have researched it more but I put my emotions ahead of reason.) But no matter what the reality is, I think that the point I put forth in is still an important idea to keep in mind.

Yeah i absolutely agree that misgendering people should not be illegal. I'm just saying Peterson, like most right wingers who have discovered a sudden passion for free speech, are just using it as a cover to hide their real agenda.

damn you got me here

As somebody who used to be a right-winger, I don't think that their passion for free speech is as much of a farce as most leftists think it is. Not too long ago, I was angry about all the deplatforming and protesting to stop right-wing speeches as all the other righties (I still am, but happen to believe in socialism now.) I don't think people on the right or left should be stopped from speaking on a public forum because of their beliefs. I listened to a lot of Ben Shapiro and he said "The only weapon the left has is to silence dissenting opinions." or something like that. And now that I'm on the left, I'd love nothing more than for us to prove him wrong. But then again I suppose it's hard for there not to be any vitriol in the current climate.

hes not that bad tbh

Yeah I think that's fair. I think their are a lot of libertarian college aged people who are genuinely concerned about the SJWs transgressing on free speech and their correct.

Though I think most more traditional conservatives (like Peterson) don't actually give a fuck about free speech and would happily outlaw blasphemy, advocating for communism, "degenerate" art and things like that. Then there are people like yababdabbadoppolis who don't actually care about free speech and are just provoking people for attention.

the phrase "right-winger" is ambiguous enough to refer to several groups, some of which (usually the most visible and vocal) are definitely more interested in pushing particular agendas than general freedom of speech. There are intelligent non-awful people in almost any group, but they're usually not the loudest and therefore aren't what immediately comes to mind

he's a Jungian?

Zizek says the only way to beat the right wing populists is to encourage debate

how about you actually watch his videos rather than projecting a bunch of bullshit onto him.

you are so far off the mark it's ridiculous.

I watched a bit of his latest Soviet Union video. The bit where he talks about collectivisation is laughable. He was literally reading off a wikipedia page on his phone.

I think his being on Sam Harris' podcast was fun. Harris totally btfo'd him on his weird right-wing trumblr postmodernism.

A boring center right mouth piece. Doesn't take an intellectual power house to be against Tumblr special snowflakes idpol faggotry but he knows nothing about Marx or the rest of the radical left.

Debunked him on what? That 'safe zones' and the attack on free speech they carry are regressive af?

Got ya comr8.

youtube.com/watch?v=O-nvNAcvUPE

This is left/pol/.

>WAIT IS THIS A VIDEO OF SOMEONE BTFOING HIS SHITTY VIEWS ON MARX KILLED A TRILLION PEOPLE?!

NO.OF COURSE NOT.IT'S SOME SJW CUNT CRYING ABOUT PRONOUNS.

Yup. Which is about the scope of opposition to him. Though I did find a video of him debating two feminists. Didn't go very well for him but that's cause they and the majority audience already subscribe to is opponents narrative (ultra-liberalism, no tolerance of intolerance (except islamic))

here

youtube.com/watch?v=JDvj6DQd93o

Face it. This IS the political left today. I hate you guys so damned hard.

This is who he is one of the harpies he is debating.

>grsj.arts.ubc.ca/persons/mary-bryson/

Did I mention I really fucking hate this left?

I swear the CIA planned this.
SJW-ism was the greatest plan to kill leftism in NA.And they did it brilliantly.

More likely FBI, as they are basically cointelpro.

What Jung's books are worth reading?

t.uni dropout

I would like Zizek, a legitimate 'cultural marxist' to talk with this guy.

fuck off and stay fucked off

wtf i'm far right now

Did you miss this;