Why are lolbertards like Bill Maher and Ben Garrison so against NGOs and vaccines?

Why are lolbertards like Bill Maher and Ben Garrison so against NGOs and vaccines?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=kvmxxEs5_zo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_rice).
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

It seems more like some consipriacyfag thing, lots of tin foil hats, and parents who had autistic kids and feel like genetic failures trying to search for a reason why their kid is an autsmial gayliure.
From new age hippies to anti government conservatives who think they are trying to make the freaking frogs gay

Ben Garrison's cartoons are like Mad Magazine rejects

NGOs are imperialist though.

I meant to say evolved plant, excuse me.

garrison is a good artist who has a recognizable style and ironically getting trolled by pol made him more famous.
Sometimes he hits it out of the park, other time i think he is just being lazy.

GMOs are bad because of patent laws and suing of farmers for contamination. While they are safe, the problems stem from the legal status of them.

I totally agree. I think a lot of libertarians would have been leftists in previous ages. Remove a few layers of tinfoilery and ideology and there's a solid enough foundation for class consciousness down there.

pic related, all I had to do to make this cartoon Holla Forums-tier was remove some of the bourgeois bullshit- "crony" and "middle class", specifically.


GEE, THANKS CAPITALISM!

I always laugh at how garrisons tin foilery or how he draws trump as ultra muscular but sometimes he has good ones.
Lefty pol should take his photos and manipulate them to be more leftist for the lulz

he can definitely be lazy

what do you think might be best replacement for capitalism?

Socialism.

we need to go back to feudalism because its human nature

Why don't lefties have a problem with this? What the fuck man..

most lefties have a bigger problem with polio

Gee, I wonder

Why would a private for profit corporation want to cure polio? They don't so they make a shitty vaccine so people will have to be mandated by the government to continue to buy their product.

just a reminder that there are actually people this stupid today

Corps may not want disease cured because profit but governments have a vested interest in their citizens not dying from disease for serveral reasons, the two big ones are the government pays for heathcare infastructure and back in the day people demanded that the government pay for and administer vaccines.

Talk to someone over 50 about vaccines. Most will tell you that vaccines are pretty sweet because they remember atleast person who got seriously ill or died from something that has a vaccine today.

Private for profit corporations have a vested interest in government. In-vested interests in fact through lobbying and bribes.

it has to be a troll or a Holla Forums falseflag

What problems do evolved plants actually fix? I'm not super paranoid on how safe they could be, but they seem pretty superfluous and are an extremely powerful tool of corporations to have complete control over an entire region's food supply while further exploiting farmers. Shit, evolved plants were largely created because of horrendously inefficient and destructive agricultural practices, like monoculture and endless chemical pesticides and fertilizers.

Polio is not particularly dangerous with modern medicine, nor is it likely to spread with modern sanitation.

i was using polio as an example. you can replace it with quite a few other diseases preventable with vaccines. the relationship pharma has with pretty fucked up and needs to be looked but imo it isn't the biggest concern the left has with vaccines. the big problem is providing vaccines to the third world because there is no profit motive to do so.

has with capital is

Are you saying the problem is the motive is unknown because the profit motive isn't it? I don't think that's true, considering someone pays for it, just not necessarily the patients.

is modern, Democratic capitalism really all that much different than some sort of modernized version of feudalism?

authoritarian socialism or libertarian socialism?

youtube.com/watch?v=kvmxxEs5_zo
Holonic Technoagrarianism

Develop hydroponic farm habitats that can sustain a small group of people, run on fusion or solar power, are built out of various forms of carbon that can be harvested from charcoal, and come equipped with a 3D printer that can rebuild the entire unit from scratch.

Pretend Earth is Mars and has to be recolonized.

my grandmother had a permanent leg function issue from polio. she'd walk with a sort of… involuntary kick from her left leg. she'd caught it as a girl, and the vaccine helped. couldn't get rid of the damage done, but still. so I've never understood those people who think polio vaccines are a scam.

ditch the tin foil. there is a legitimate interest in vaccination that isn't strictly profit based

or because, you know, it's fucking stupid to think vaccinations are inherently dangerous or cause autism

but - and I'm asking sincerely here (s+) - how does that effectively replace capitalist economy? the money to build that technology needs to come from somewhere, the labor and research that goes into it requires adequate compensation, and unless you're planning on being a more socialist technoagrarian society (which isn't necessarily bad) who determines the benefactors of those labors?

Produce more crop yield per plot of land per resources put into the soil. They can also be engineered to produce vitamins and minerals they wouldn't otherwise produce, which can help populations that have a hard time getting them (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_rice).

Tell me how vaccines are bad for you. Don't give me mindless skeptical horseshit, actually tell me the biochemical process of vaccines that cause harm to large amounts of people.

USSR-style State socialism.

spoiler alert: they can't

warning - opinions incoming
anarchism > communism > capitalism >a literal pile of shit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ancap