When "odd" and "even" are used for logic, it's not to mean actual odd or even numbers, it just means that the integers sequentually alternate a variable with two states. Like it's "turning integers into binary 0 or 1", while that's not exactly the case. 0 even 1 odd 2 even 3 odd 4 even 5 odd 6 even 7 odd 8 even 9 odd 10 even
This sounds less like game fuckups and more like personal 'tism.
Adam Brooks
Genji and the whole "Giant Enemy Crab" thing after being announced as a realistic game about Japan's real pre-shogunate wars.
Luke James
From a number science perspective, zero is even.
Jace Martinez
Zero is even, no question about it. If you want to start an autism fight, you should get people asking "Is zero positive or negative?"
David Perry
I thought 0 was gender neutral?
Nathan Brown
Even better, ask people "Is zero a prime number or a composite number?"
Just watch the chaos ensue.
Grayson Fisher
Giant Mammoths existed less than 5,000 years ago, it's not a big stretch
Lucas Anderson
Life? The tutorial is shit, it's grindy as hell and the endgame sucks. Also they forgot to patch out permanent iron man mode.
Cooper Wood
There are other ways to parse digits, though, like the functional definition. A computer would consider an odd number to give a non-integer when dividing in half, while an even number gives an integer when dividing in half. Zero is a weird case because it does meet this standard on a very surface level, but when defining it in terms of a set of finite values (i.e. 3 = |+|+|) you get the real result, that 0 ( + , …) is not a number at all, neither odd or even, it's the absence of value. For this reason, a programmer defining sets as odd or even may add a conditional to ensure there is at least one value embedded.
Similarly,
neither.
neither. Zero holds only assumed and symbolic properties, and it acts differently depending on how you frame the situation.
Happy to help, OP. Next I recommend memorizing various laws and identities so you won't make such SHIT threads again.
Joshua Baker
YOU ARE LIKE A LITTLE BABY WATCH THIS
Mason Hughes
Dynasty Warriors
John White
Metal Gear Rising's tutorial is pretty awful, it doesn't even stop you from progressing if you don't do as your told in the parrying section. Just kill the guy and it kicks you off to the next section then the game.
Colton Ward
Retard. Bring the history books that say that there were giant crabs fighting samurais in pre-feudal Japan then.
Carter Stewart
...
Kayden Baker
Has both +0 and -0 if you're using a signed integer.
Parker Ross
Not for programming. The negative number has one extra value than the positive number.
Joseph Price
in programming zero has a value, that's a flaw in and of itself
Aaron Long
Honestly, I find null to be a bigger problem than 0
Eli Perez
Shit at being Metroid, shit at being a Contra style run 'n' gun.
Jayden Lee
don't get me started on null
Caleb Hill
...
Joshua King
Do you not understand how signed ints work? The first bit is whether the number is positive or negative.
Benjamin Jones
I am disappoint.
Anthony Watson
Yes. And using an sbyte for example, the numbers start at -128, increase to 0, and cap at +127.
Connor Wood
0 is considered even because even numbers are numbers that set the carry bit to 0 after doing a %2 to them.
Juan Hill
You guys like Gauntlet, right? Well, what if someone made Gauntlet, but made it PC exclusive and forced all players to use the same keyboard? They actually did this.
Ian Collins
Yes, but it does: If we're using only 8 bits (essentially, a word) this sequence would be: Wonderfull world, the one of lower-level processing, isn't it? I want to choke whoever came up with BCD to death.
Ian Martinez
B-but you could use a gamepad. Right? Right? I only played it single player. Loved Gauntlet on the PSone, but was really disapointed with the newer one.
Levi Lee
You mean the remake? They also crippled it with Steam cancer and then stuffed it full of microtransactions.
Nicholas Murphy
I don't think a C64 has enough inputs even if you could use a controller.
Cooper Robinson
But that's wrong. By IEEE specification, literally the entire spec on how any CPU chipset you have consumer access to, is build on, defines otherwise.
Bentley Moore
...
Robert Robinson
That could be mitigated by PIRATING. I don't really know why. It just didn't feel like a Gauntlet game to me. Maybe I missed the open spaces from the PSone, maybe the items, or the simple TURBO mechanics. Also: the hordes of enemies were shit. Actually, wait a second.
THAT'S PRECISELY WHERE THEY FUCKED UP See, modern dev's don't know how to make horder enemies. In the newer gauntlet, there's plenty of enemies. But they spawn in waves, climped together. One or two AoE later and they're dead. On the PSone version, enemies had generators all over and came from all sides. THAT's a proper horde. You can only attack in one direction at a time, so at most you can cleave a path to run through and reach a critical point (like a generator or a chest) and you gotta keep moving because the horde is closing in on you. The AoE you have are reserved for when things get dire: you start cutting a path, something with a lot more HP gets in the way. Your path is blocked, enemies are one inch away from you. You got potions (that are limited in the first few levels and gotta be rationed), you got items that cost money, can't use them willy nilly and you had your turbo attacks. Lvl2 Turbo was a surround attack that cleared a few mobs around you to give you a breather but on a cooldown. Shit, that's it. After a few levels, the game threw so much shit your way that whenever you found yourself in trouble, you had a dozen ways to get out of it. It came down to optimizing and figuring the best way to pull it through. It's not really a tactical game, it's a fairly simple hack & slash, but you had a bunch of shit you could do at any given time. The newer gauntlet gives less tools and the few that it gives you are limited to being equiped 2 at a time: an amulet and a relic (can't really remember the mechanics, it was what, 2 years ago?). Limiting the player for balance and dificulty reasons is retarded: just throw more enemies, bigger enemies, faster enemies, enemies from above, enemies from bellow, enemies from within and let the carnage and particle effects consume the screen.
Logan Perez
...
Nathaniel Russell
That's after your compiler fixes it. And you're working with a consumer-grade chip. I'm talking about raw shit. PLC's, small chips you put in fridges or crappy alarm clocks. Maybe should say crap from 10 years ago. Most modern ALU's will read "-1" and when you "++" it will perform a sign change. Or the sign change occurs in the rever, when "1" get's "–" to "0". I got to work with a chip that did both and it fucked up constantly because we had to test for sign changes. We ended up moving all values to the 1 - 20 range because of it, less hassle You're also printing it on a console. The Write() will never print "+0" or "0", only "0"
Eli Johnson
Actually, the blue-cased keyword, "sbyte" is defined in the .NET specifications, that is, common CIL code. If it were a "SByte", then yes, that is the C# equivalent type.
This is how God intended Man to program. You can't get closer to the CPU than this. It's like having sex with the ALU making that dirty whore JUMPNZ on your dick all day.
Sebastian Bailey
ARE YOU AN FUCKING RETARDED?
Lucas Johnson
Here let me help you. Posts like yours often convey a stronger meaning if you attach a video or image to it.
Isaiah Peterson
By the way, you know why that "Gauntlet" remake was made in the first place right? A Gauntlet clone by the name of Hammerwatch was released a while back and was pretty good. It made the rights holders sweat and decide they needed to remind people that Gauntlet exists.
Jose Rogers
Who would win in a fight?
Carson Hughes
...
Isaiah Reed
Newsflash, retard: CPUs don't run x86 assembly anymore, it's cores are RISC and x86 code is converted to that using bypass translation unit. That's not even to mention things like out of order execution.
Andrew Stewart
It's called "by definition" you dumbfuck. Same as with 1 is not a prime.
David Bennett
give me your lunch money
Parker Cook
...
Adrian Lopez
Of course zero is even. If -1 is odd, and 1 is odd, and 0 is in between them, then it's even. Brainlets.
Isaac Young
Give me your sauce
James Long
...
Nathaniel Diaz
Is this some monty hall bullshit? You either win, lose, or draw
Isaac Nguyen
Assuming a draw means playing again, drawing has no effect on winning or losing.
Christopher Gutierrez
and what does draw do? resets the game
Kevin Myers
It's ⅓ chance to win and ⅓ chance to draw. Hence RPSLS is a better game because chance of draw is only ⅕. Also no negative zero is the same as positive zero.
Draw draws out the game in a stalemate, resulting in both of you quitting eventually, with neither of you winning or losing.
Justin Turner
yikes
Luke Garcia
...
Dylan Wilson
So clearly, we need RPS-infinity, since as N approaches zero, you get more and more likely to draw; only with infinity does it become certainty.
Cooper Johnson
The game I depicted here is better, You both chose either odd or even, like heads or tails, then each one throws any number with their fingers, you can even use two hands if you're retarded. Winner depens on if the sum of the numbers is odd or even, so it doesn'1t actually matter if the number you chose is high or low, only if it's odd or even, so technically only 1s and 0s would work. It's impossible to hit a tie with this game. I've no idea how it's supposed to be called in other countries, it's very popular in Brazil yet I've never seen it in any sort of media.
Another popular one is used when there's three people: Everyone throws out either a 0 or a 1, not choosing anything, the winner is the one that threw the number that only he threw. Like, two guys throw 1s and only one guy threw a 0, or vice versa. If everyone throws the same number, then it's rematch.
William Martin
Couldn't you just make it so that anyone who picked an unpopular choice is removed? Eg, you have 13 people, and cull about half the people out
Also, there was a gameshow based around the odd or even concept, called Friend or Foe. It started with 6 players and did trivia rounds to build up money as they were gradually eliminated. At the end, whoever had the most picked a partner or something, and they'd do a teamup round to get extra money.
The catch was that they also secretly voted FRIEND or FOE
Thomas Turner
Zero is actually a number that contains all values, much like infinity. The proof for this is elementary school shit: 0 = 1 + -1 + 2 + -2 + 3 + -3 … Zero is equal to the sum of all numbers.
Hunter Torres
Sorry it's equal to -1/12
Easton Wright
Actually, having come back to this video months later, I question (everyone's) ability to devise the sum of -1/12.
He states that with the sum of [N=1-1+1-1+1-1…] it's equal to 0.5, because you don't know if it's either 0 or 1 so you just average it (with additional ways to prove this). However, I disagree. This makes sense if you are guaranteed to start on +1-1. What if it was the other way around? It would be -1+1, and the reverse would be true: You would either have -1 or 0, so if you averaged that, it would be -0.5, which would be the opposite of what he claimed. Thus, the sum truly would be 0 if you follow what he claimed to a logical conclusion.
Christopher Davis
You are close, but nu cigar.
Easton Scott
Zero, 0, null, nothing, or what ever, has multiple possible attributes, and you should assign them according to what you are trying to do. This is a rare as hell case of everybody who manages to do something worthwhile with their set of attributes assigned to zero are right.
The number zero has been shit written in sand and bonfire flame warred to death - long before any of us was even born. I bet even the ancient Sumerians had jolly time trying to accurately define nothing.
Mathematical real number zero is accurate if you are not an attention whoring academic.