Reminder that the next Prime Minister of the United Kingdom follows Phil Greaves on twitter

Phil Greaves is just an outlet for Corbyn to vent his anti imperialist shitposts

Ask not if I'm ready, ask if he's ready for whats about to happen.

Wait, does he really? Is Corbyn a secret ML?

Anarkkiddies get out.

Is this actually real? Why would he risk following such a blatant tankie? Shouldn't the media be all over this?

honestly I always wondered how enthusiastic Stalinists carried out purges before I stumbled across tankie twitter

they'll just blame the next economic crash on corbyn or some other voodoo mystic shit like always.

Corbynite Possadism with Phil Greaves characteristics will win!

Because Phil Greaves is a nobody irl?

I like the Chairman Corbyn meme and all, but really, it's depressing that we'll have more Tory niggotry for the foreseeable future.

Someone like this will NEVER be a good country leader.

Corbyn following an ML on Twitter is dodgy no matter who it is.

Are we this much of an outcast to normies? From my experience saying you are an ML is fine; saying you are a Stalinists usually gets you in trouble.

Still, both is not as a bad as saying you are a Nazi.

The fire rises

fucking CPGB-ML man, they're popping up more and more often

What is if Corbyn is a CPGB-ML plant?
What is if Corbyn is actually "Phil Greaves"?

party membership has been increasing pretty rapidly i think. what's good is they're also pretty active online so will help spread tankism to other countries as well.

Sometimes i feel like germany needs a visit by a delegation of advisers so we can get a united ML party.
I'm aware it's a ridiculous thought, the current state is just that depressing. However i'm glad we have comrades in Europe doing well. Makes me feel less shitty.

...

true tbh, wenger is a serial loser.

obvs not a socdem, but mcdonnell would clearly be a much better leader, he's far more charismatic.

hype

First with wanting to nationalize the means of reproduction with state-mandated gf's, and now this.

CORBYN WILL PAINT THE STREETS OF LONDON RED WITH BOURGEOISIE BLOOD

BORN TO DIE

WORLD IS A FUCK

KILL EM ALL 1917

I AM CLASS MAN

747785895734438 DEAD KULAKS

Isn't their blood more lavender colored? PANTONE pls?

Corbyn

Tough on clerks, tough on the causes of clerks

Kek, proving yet again that leftists are beta.

"Communism is the organized mutiny of quantity over quality"

bild.de/regional/berlin/linksextremismus/92-prozent-der-berliner-linksradikalen-wohnen-noch-bei-mutti-44249918.bild.html

ZIO-MERG SHILLS BTFO AGAIN XDDDD

Yeah, totally legit source.
Das ist schon eine wahrhaft herausragende Leistung, sich nicht nur mit Fahne als Vollidiot bloßzustellen, sondern es so deutlich und kompakt durch Wort und Tat zu unterstreichen.

XDDDD

color me surprised.

Quantity has a quality all its own.

r8 my phil spurdo

why is Wojak in the imperial Russian colours?

BRETTY GOOD :DDDD

That's in Novorossiya, isn't it?

is that you nogf nazi?

the first pic is yeah

the second is from 1993

hmm, maybe I should join them.

what do you think of the Revolutionary Communist Group?

So they're both just interchangeable symbols for Russian chauvinism now?

they are probably the "second best" party in the uk, but there are a few issues they are iffy about (syria, and other foreign issues).

however they are a pretty solid organisation in the uk, and do a fair bit of practical action.

Wot?

You mean the cuck who just lost a seat labour held for 80 years and regularly get's wrecked on PMQ's by a headmistress given a an acting class by Thatcher's reanimated corpse?

AUSTERRURUHTEEE AUSTERUHTEE…

These don't hold any meaning for them other than RUSSIA STRONK. Ideology is a purely visual affair in Russia.

wew

I think so. Both symbolise a strong Russian state

holy shit he does

aren't they open border retards

hey there pol

how is it good? how does it benefit me?

it lets migrants demand the same labour rights and social benefits so that it is no longer proitable to porky to hire illegal immigrants or to start wars abroad to expand their reserve army of labour

why don't you try reading Marx?

what if corbyn… IS phil greaves???

>says he's going to get rid of trident

Open boarders INCREASES the reserve army of labour

yes, people will travel thousands of miles just so that they face unemployment because their main advantage, which is being able to work for a lower wage, is gone

contractors will hire people that do not know english or don't have the qualifications over a local even when he has to pay the same for labour

HERE WE GO

it just means letting capitalists bring in endless cheap labour. in the 19th century it was Chinese workers, in the 20th century it was Caribbean/Asian workers, now it's eastern Europeans or Africans coming in. Makes no difference

also I don't see how living in a society of people who don't look like me or share my values benefits me

sounds like jewish supremacist concern trolling

how is it cheap if they cannot hire them for lower wages and threaten them to deport them if they complain or unionize?

it absolutely does you inbreed retard

are you retarded? like how fucking retarded are you? why would people emmigrate if they won't find a job?

hey there polyp

but that's exactly what they will do

capitalism requires unemployment and i've no desire to see my living space flooded

nope, again, migrants will be able to demand the same wages and benefits as citizens, and capitalist can't threaten them with deportation

yes, and they also need lower wages and exploited labourers, capitalists can't exploit migrant labourers if they can demand the same rights as citizens

are you stupid?

Corbyn needs to speak out about Pizzagate tbh.

CORBYNISPHIL

why would they?

they can demand it all they want, doesn't mean it will or should be implemented

because he is a worker with the legal right to demand it, and the capability of engaging in legal action if the employer refuses?

and if they have the legal system behind, they will get it, which means employers would have no reason to hire migrants, as migrants are harder to employ due to cultural and language barriers

it won't if cucks like you win

it should if you want to stop globalism

it seems like you are very stupid user

...

nah. we can have socialism without mass immigration or open borders

He's the hero that Holla Forums deserves but not the one it needs right now.

pls don't.

citation needed

the petty booj thinks this is bad somehow?

Are you insane?
Labour just got blown the fuck out of a seat they've held consistently since 1935 and narrowly avoided losing in fucking Stoke(!), Corbyn's a bad joke at this point, and the Tories are looking at running the show for a generation at least.

Hilarious. No way mate, the landscape of UK party politics is about to change dramatically. Splits and mergers are on the cards for the next generation. No doubt about your Corbyn comments, but that doesn't mean the Tories will take it.

Now hol up are you actually gonna try to use meme-revisionism to erase any memories of the threads by nogf Nazi who actually tried to make arguments for state-mandated gfs?!

ever heard of the Soviet Union?

not real socialism

Shit answer.

the USSR was shit

deal with it kiddo

Nope. Read a friggin' book m80

Corbyn is Michael Foot all over again.
As long as he's in charge, the Tories aren't in any danger of losing the next general election, let alone any serious opposition in parliament.
Maybe the LibDems or the Greens will come back into fashion, but Labour is a sinking ship with Corbyn at the helm.
Christ, Theresa May isn't half the politician that Thatcher was (not an endorsement, but denying she had ability is stupid) Labour should be mopping the floor with her, but they're ahead 18 points in the polls.

yup

"18 points ahead in the polls" means nothing as a static fact. We have to understand the world as in motion. What matters is the direction of a movement, not the place in one instance of time.

Learn2Dialectics marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1939/12/1939-abc.pdf

The only direction of Labour under Corbyn is down.
He can't even man the fuck up and admit that as the leader, he might possibly have something to do with the party's frankly embarrassing loss. Fucks sake, he said it was a protest vote agains the establishment.
Who the fuck thinks that voting for the sitting government (the Conservatives no less) is some sort of fucking protest vote?
Corbyn is a meme candidate and unlike Trump, he can't even connect with the disaffected to win.
The Tories are shredding the NHS,hellbent on crashing out of the EU, the single market, and possibly the customs union as well, and Labour is losing to them.
That's the direction of the world at the moment.

...

...

As I said, I never suggested that Corbyn's direction was positive.

But the options aren't "Corbyn up, May down/May up, Corbyn down".

We need to look at the general picture of the direction of the mood in society. We are moving away from the ability of either of the main parties to hold a majority or hold their party together. This is a time of deep splits in the ruling class. We are seeing similar shit go down in the main parties of other countries - just look at the USA. Both Republican and Democratic parties are facing crises of leadership, in their own way, and are fracturing.

At least there is one person who calls out ironygoofs and Third Worldists.

Phil is my guy

we were warned but we didn't listen

The general mood in society seems to be "Corbyn's a useless tosser".
You can wax philosophical all you like, but these are issues that do impact people, and the fact that Labour is losing when it should be winning says more about him than anything else.
I actually agree with a lot of what he says, but if he can't get the public at large to agree with him, then he's worthless.
Doubly so, since May is running basically unchecked and undoing over a half-century's worth of Labour's accomplishments.

okay

Sure. And also "May is a useless tosser" and "the whole political establishment is crap" and other such exciting views. Come on you idiot, think about what I'm saying.

Surely, if only Corbyn took full control of the campaign in copeland and parachuted in a pink-haired, nose-pierced, momentum candidate who preached the necessity of the nationalization of everything, open borders and the closing of nuclear industry, then people wouldn't have voted conservative.

They only voted conservative to spite the establishment you see, they wanted to send a message to the right-wing-blairites-that-should-just-join-the-tories that they're not having it anymore with them, and will only vote for a labour party purged of the blairite scum.

Also, the canary is the only trusted news source, all the others are biased blairites and probably tories as well.

He's the head of the bloody party, that makes it his fault.
That's what being in charge means, you mong.

If you're implying that this is somehow going to pave the way for a party or candidate even further to the left than Corbyn is, you need to share whatever it is your on, because I want some of that too.
He's already pretty well left, he'd have to be Seumas Milne to go much further, and Milne couldn't lead a pissup at a brewery much less lead Labour (or anyone else) to victory.

I kind of admire Corbyn in a Trump way. The Blairites and centrists will do all they can and he's not going to give an inch.

Are you memeing me fam? Corbyn insisted that the local council choose the candidate and he support whoever came out.

Not with such a rebellious party constantly trying to undermine him from day one. This has seriously become a cycle of self-fulfilling prophecy

Do you know what a revolutionary is

You think he could pure the blarites? Or are they so entrenched in the party that we should write Labour off as a lost cause and get a militant style new party

purge*

Starting a new party is a lost cause. People who have traditionally voted labour will continue to vote for labour.

Parliament is a lost cause regardless.

Labour is shit though,and just because people follow tribalism voting now doesn't mean they will forever. UKIP got a fuck ton of votes last general election, and those were from Labour areas mostly

Yeah, they're pretty damned thin on the ground, and it's going to take a lot more misery than most people are experiencing now to change that.
And by the time that happens, there will be nothing left, since both sides will have destroyed it through maliciousness, apathy, and incompetence.
Do you want to start over from square one?
Because I don't.

PASOC fell to SYRIZA
PSOE to PODEMOS
…?

obviously revolution>reformism, but its a good propagandising tool

Is there disenchantment with labour? all I see is Corbyn hatred.

The disenchantment with Labour has been going on since before Corbyn. Corbyn brought more people back into Labour than had been in ten years.

there has been disenfranchisement since Blair in 97'

corbyn is ineffectual because his policies are just radical enough (read: not at all) to earn him the universal derision of the mainstream media.

Labour will only become """"electable"""" again once they put forward a candidate who the corporate media agree with.

The idea that it's some sort of personal failing of Corbyn that has led to all this is fucking laughable.

This is why you don't get involved in electoral politics, there is no victory to be found there for the proletariat.

...

Labour needs Asserism.

Like Jean-Luc Godard said: Communism only happened once in history, which was in a match between Hungary and England that ended 6-3. England had the best individual players, but Hunagry won the game because they played as a team.

...

...

You live in a country where the public votes on how a politician eats a sandwich.

Well then, is it better or worse than Labour being a resurgent force with some Tony Blair at the helm? Will the left have to yet again become the right in order to beat the right?

...

blairites get the fuck out, commissar corbyn will make the UK great again