Stirnerite egoist unionism and Bordigist organic centralism seem to have gigantic overlap...

Stirnerite egoist unionism and Bordigist organic centralism seem to have gigantic overlap, wherein for Stirner only if the self-interest of the whole union of egos is sated things are to be done, and for Bordiga only if the class-material interest of the communist horizon is completely unanymous centrally things are to be done. Both also having a disdain for sacrificing this consensus-led common good through compromises like a vote, which have the power to break the unity of individual members and their collective interest in always being in proper agreement; the agreement that their organization must be a ego-unitary organ. Democracy is a spook only opportunists fall for.

This is not a shitpost: fusing two of the board's most iconic subjects of shitposting was only the way of spiritual-material dialectic to inform us of this ultimate synthesis. You may not like it, but Stirnero-Bordigist egoist centralism is the future. Deal with it, you go-getting specters.

Other urls found in this thread:

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/labour.htm.
flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/tucker/tucker2.html)
marxists.org/reference/archive/stirner/ego-and-its-own.htm
marxists.org/archive/bordiga/works/1922/democratic-principle.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

shitposting aside that is actually unironically some big overlap in how to approach politics between the two.

how did you make the flaming text btw?

Are you doubting the egoist organ's wisdoms, you fucking ectopportunist?

cooltext.com > burning logo type + font > save as transparent PNG w/ alpha compositing.

how?

Just export the image to a decently advanced image editor like GIMP by copy/pasting the source file – GIF or PNG depending on whether you animated it or not on cooltext.com – and within editor exporting it as transparent PNG, which in GIMP is called PNG with alpha compositing.

Can we like, ban all these fucking autists

My fucking sides.


If we're going to start banning autists you'll be the first to go, you mutie sperg.

Sick and tired of these marxists cucks making fun of us mutualists

Go ahead, try to point out just ONE flaw with mutualism

It's capitalism.

Wrong

Don't get the hate tbqh. I am offering you a revelatory avenue of compromise between Stirner and Bordiga: the ultimate and final politics for a way out of capitalism that is both idealist and materialist, individualist and collectivist at the same time; this synthesism of egoist unionism and organic centralism that will lead us to certain self-other-interest.


It's not egoist centralism.

Ok thanks

...

No im just post-modern

He's not the one merging memes and considering it progress.

No problem.

I didn't offer you mutualism tho.

By Proudhon andnTucker you will pay for that comment

Christ, another one. Are you breeding or something? If you are please stop, I don't want to live in a world full of humourless robots.

Literal statist bootlicker detected

...

Nah: marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/labour.htm.

It helps that he was principally in agreement with the general mission of the IWA he joined: that of not seeking to make immediate changes for the sake of it, but of a circle of highly class conscious intellectuals to critique one another. This is also why he said the following of Proudhon:
>though opposed to socializing the ownership of capital, [Proudhon] aimed nevertheless to socialize its effects by making its use beneficial to all instead of a means of impoverishing the many to enrich the few…by subjecting capital to the natural law of competition, thus bringing the price of its own use down to cost (from: flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/tucker/tucker2.html)
which is already a step above recognizing Proudhon's efforts as somehow post-capitalistic, but simply a specific, well-argumented type of social reform (which Proudhon's mutualism was, for the record).

Join the organic centralist vanguard of the materialist egoists, comrade. Together we can bring certain change to the world, both for our own benefit and that of craven man.

...

I miss the spooky skeleton squad.

I believe he's quoting Benjamin Tucker.

how the fuck is anything supposed to get done without voting?

Only way to solve this is breadlines

Wot

Correct, I quoted Tucker on Proudhon for the larger part of my post. I don't know why you insisted on sperging out at the small part where I link Marx's Manuscripts on Proudhon.

I'd say you're triggered, but I don't want to alienate a future potential egoist-vanguardist to the organic centralist fold. So join me, fellow infant in the making.

Organic decision-making: only if there is an unanymous, proper plan of action to go forward, prior universally-accorded decisions by the egoist central reign. This, in turn, forces upon the egoist-vanguardist system of organic centralism to press upon the process of unanymous agreement to their selfish-material horizon and to make a decision.

marxists.org/reference/archive/stirner/ego-and-its-own.htm
marxists.org/archive/bordiga/works/1922/democratic-principle.htm

...

What about Egoist Organic Decentralism?

Still spooked and as opportune as ever are your deviations.

Wow, glad the idea took off

Today is only the birthbed of egoist centralism. Nothing can stop us.

but compromising implies an other, therefore non egoist. self-other-interest is not egoist

this is contradictory in every way

If your self-interest is mutually assured through discourse-pathed agreement, you are not impeding upon your self-interest, and that of material interest in your class.

Are you saying the Creative Infant's maxim of desire is not to be in firm control of ensuring that all other egos/Creative Infant's maxims of desire are fulfilled in accordance to their universal interest in abolishing capitalism?

shit really, that's hard to even conceive of
huh i wonder if maybe there are more examples of this and the reason they're not well discussed is pointless sectarianism

sounds pretty spooky

Is there a situation in which the subject of wage labor's interest is not to abolish his condition of existence? If yes: you're either a localist or an idealist, who thinks that self-interest is either dependent on one's literal or productive-relational position in society exlusively (and not the material constitution that shaped these localities) if the former, or that one's self-interest appears out of some spooky spiritual realm into people's minds like Ayn Rand's and many other classcucks and cuckettes did and thought if the latter.

Embrace egoist centralism.

Bump for the new vanguard of the universal ego's self-interest in egoist centralism.

Read the two texts here and synthesize their radical conclusions.

you really can't reconcile egoism with communism

You can reconcile egoism with anything as long as you authentically desire what you are doing

The reason its not discussed is because the good nihilist posters don't post here as often as they used to, and the only ones that do are shitty, dogmatic market socialists. The reason behind market socialist stirner posters? Both Stirner and Market Socialism are meme positions that are adopted by people who read very little, if at all, and that includes their own theorists and those that responded to them.

BUMP

The only guy with an overlap with Stirner is…

OC bump.
So OP, any ideas on how we could manage the milk shops without leaving our comfy armchairs?