Stirner was fucking racist

Stirner was fucking racist.

Other urls found in this thread:

marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/ph/phc3c.htm
exiledonline.com/exterminate-the-men-honoring-andrea-dworkin-a-feminist-who-meant-it-and-paid/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

Stirners racism was his property. Get fucked statists.

the section comparing the course of human history 1) says that the racial comparisons are not meant to be taken literally but as a way of explaining the concept better considering the rampant race realism at the time 2) he attributes "negroids" to ancient egypt and describes them as being worldy since they didnt believe in a heaven, not because theyre dumb

his racism was totally stupid and prove that he's in no way grasped above the mediocrity of his time

o rly ;D

I don't have copy in English but (in my translation)


No, it is not racist at any point, and obviously shouldn't be taken literally. xD

A lot of early anarchists were anti-semitic. Victorians in general loved thier racial science and aren't exactly known as socially progressive.

Also, he said nothing that Hegel didn't said before him, but in more simplified way and absolutising his own life experience, as educated young german man from XIX century, to be the Only and representative for the transformation of the human spirit as such - which wasn;t present in Hegel, who was at least with respect to empirical data.

So Stirner philosophy is just worse version of Hegel's. :(

the worse for them

yes, but OP, you're a white male

maximum leftism achieved

Whoa, truly shocking bruh.
What else? are you going to tell me that Newton had a firm believe in god despite being a brilliant scientist?

I was reading the english translation. he didnt say "negroes", but the "age of negroes" as in when northern africa, specifically egypt, was a major power. he was referring to a time period, not a group of people. and again, it wasnt about intelligence, but the fact that they were concerned with the objective world and not the ego.

why did this shitpost get so many replies

everyone deserves equal distribution of posts comrade

I'm white female tbh

There's nothing bad in faith in God, it's even desirable.

Post titties with time stamp for evaluation.

gross

HE WAS A FUCKING WHITE MALE!
But really, who gives a shit? We don't judge history by modern standards.

We need to make babies for the rev comrade, come over soon

what about people like John Brown?

This almost made me want to defend Stirner as terrible as he is. X was a racist disregard everything he/she ever said or did is probably the worst intellectual argument in history.

...

I actually heard a r\soc SJW once say "We shouldn't read Marx because he was racist instead read Anglea Davis."

If you judge people out of their historical and social context you're going to end up with shit opinions like that.

Remember that he was alive looong ago, back before Middle-Eastern or African culture even had advanced cities.

Even his own society lacked mainstream electricity and electronics for use.

He lived in primitive times, and black people lived even more primitively.

But dress a black guy, or a white guy, or an asian guy in modern, nice clothes, give them some gadgets and education, and you've got an intelligent, free person.

Good. Racial equality has always been a spook.

It's not intellectual argument. It was expression of emotional outrage while reading "The German Ideology" of Marx.

In fact, Marx so completly destroyed Stirner, that nothing is left. I suppose sirnerism is popular again because what Marx wrote is tl; dr for most of people today.

You don't even know what the controversy is retard

No, gods don't exist.

The entire concept is a fabrication.
The universe exists like a snowflake exists.

Beautiful, but naturally ocuring. No god.

Not to mention, the more a person believes in god and religion, the more batshit insane they are.

You get less religious, you get more sane.
Unless you go full political, but still, if you stay away from politics, religion, societal organizations, or other bullshit, you end up an intelligent person.

I said advanced, as in, technologically and scientifically advanced.

Those nations were heavily religious, and thus, completely retarded. Their culture, their customs, their people, must have seemed like enormous retards to white people.

But white people from the 19th century appear primitive to us. We live in a world of computers, electronics, plentiful food, and plentiful, nice housing.

I mean, the poor still suffer, but if you're middle or upper class, your life is nice as fuck.

It wouldn't be this way, even for the upper class, before the 20th century.

As it was, Africa did not have access to the most advanced technology that existed at the time. Thus, they looked primitive.

This is peak nu-atheism

gods don't, but God exist
Entire concept of fabrication of God is fabrication, because you said about fabricated image of God, which, is, indeed, fabricated. :๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€))
True.
No, it's just you have scientistic religion. Believe in sanity is not less religious than beleve in God, after you look at if from certain point of view.

"hurr durr, every religion except mine is wrong xDDD"

You fucking retard.

wrong, every religion is right

Fuck off, retard.

Rare birds.

I need citations and proper references.
Black people might be dumb, but they exceed at making other peoples property their own, which is the true measure of a mans worth.

Prove it, faggot.

marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/ph/phc3c.htm

You better not be straight.

lol you are one stupid cunt m8. I bet you thought that was an intelligent post.
It probably was by your standards but it's a bunch of rehashed platitudes that doesn't stand up to a rigorous process that involves simply observing the society around you.

You must trace the origins of your society far deeper than you have done.

You must trace it all the way back, as far as you can go.

Well, being among the minority here whose actually read the German ideology you deserve a sticker.

Marx shows in a fairly convincing way that racism is an important part of Stirner's ideology. I would've led with that because 'X was racist' reminds me too much of the middle brow ideology of SJW liberals:


Written in 2005. John Dolan saw where we were going well before the internet caught in a frenzied and unintelligent way with gamergate.
exiledonline.com/exterminate-the-men-honoring-andrea-dworkin-a-feminist-who-meant-it-and-paid/

Everyone on here should read/listen to the War Nerd.

You must be deliberately misinterpreting his works to be led to such a conclusion.
Or you're just illiterate. Either one.

Most people at that time in Europe were racist by our standards. Does it really matter, attack the philosophy not the man.

But it's not an excuse for philosopher, also, not everyone was racist.

Also, as Marx had written, Stirner's view on history of philosophy is based on mistakes and stereotypes, and racism is only one of many. It's because he's depending on speculative philosophy of history built on gross generalizations and ignoring empirical data - and that was visible also to educated people of his time, as Karl Marx for example. In general, his argumentation was pointed as 'juggling tricks' which is a pun, rarely containing new things and not a tautology.

It is not an excuse simply an explanation and we should understand cultural context. You don't have to take a philospher wholesale in everything he said,. We shoud realize their contribution and take the good from them.

The following excerpt is from Platoโ€™s Republic, Book V, page 469.

First take slavery. Is it right that Greek states should sell Greeks into slavery? Ought they not rather to do all they can to stop this practice and substitute the custom of sparing their own race, for fear of falling into bondage to foreign nations?

That would be better, beyond all comparison.

They must not, then, hold any Greek in slavery themselves, and they should advise the rest of Greece not to do so.

Certainly. Then they would be more likely to keep their hands off one another and turn their energies against foreigners.

Page 470:

Is it not also reasonable to assert that the Greeks are a single people, all of the same kindred and alien to the outer world of foreigners?

Yes.

Then we shall speak of war when Greeks fight with foreigners, whom we may call their natural enemies. But Greeks are by nature friends of Greeks, and when they fight, it means Hellas is afflicted by dissension which ought to be called civil strife.

Even Marx was a racist.
Marx, for example, wrote to Engels on July 30, 1862, about one of the leaders of socialism in Germany and his rival, Ferdinand Lasalle, whom he referred to as, โ€œthat Jewish n****r Lasalle.

โ€œHe wrote: โ€œIt is now absolutely clear to me that, as both the shape of his head and his hair texture shows, he descends from the Negroes who joined Mosesโ€™ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or grandmother on the paternal side hybridized with a nigger) โ€ฆ The pushiness of the fellow is also nigger-like.โ€

You mean after you historically illiterate moron.

He was a brocialist and #NotMyComrade

Racial egalitarianism is a spook.

...