What rights would I have under socialism?

None, you'll have lefts instead

Try not to trip over the meme-ing Stirnerites

LEL
You can strike but then the majority can vote to kick you out of the coop and then you will starve on the streets.

The Ego is a Spook

No it isn't, we've been over this before.

...

The vanguard will defend firing squads for fascists

...

wew.

Have you tried looking at the little letters of a Mondragon or Credit Mutuel contract? There's your coop capital rights right there, lad.

He's right though. The only reason Stirnerites can tell is because they ignore advances in theory surrounding the human psyche made decades after their meme philosopher died, and fail to see that the ego is a "spook" because like any other spook, it is deceptively operative.

This is why market socialism is a mistake

wew lad

It's called antidemocratic sabotage that you'd be participating in.
It's a majority decision. Learn how to debate and win people on your side or get concessions by raising your concerns and generally your personal interests to be considered.

Which answers your second question:
Freedom of speech is the essence of developing and perfectionating the economy and society as a whole. Of course it's granted and more so than under any other system before needed, encouraged and enabled.

Striking is a mean of fighting when there is no workplace democracy and you cannot democratically decide over the use of the means of production because decision making falls under the profit motive and is exclusively the right of the owner, it can logically only apply under capitalist conditions when the workers are alienated from the MoP.

Depending on large a majority it is, striking would be pretty pointless, as you would necessarily have the majority of the workplace against you. You might as well just say "i'll quit if this goes through" and levy that against them during the vote. It's not as though you can't do it, but it wouldn't be at all a viable tactic to get what you want.

Well it depends. If you're a janitor at the coop and the majority decides to cut janitor pay by 25% you might very well be able to get all the other janitors to go on strike with you.

If we're talking about socialism, there is no decision coming out of nowhere and being implemented upon those effected by it.

Admittedly, something "similar" did happen, to give an example, in the GDR - which lead to the strikes of '53, however the decision was revoked the day before the strikes and a newspaper incorrectly claimed otherwise.
It did result in an apology for even coming up with the measurements and self critizism for the administrative excess.

If even a "tankie society" wants to handle these things better, you should question your views. It's not supposed to even get to a situation where people want to consider striking. If it comes up, then there were administrative, undemocratic mistakes made in advance that need to be corrected.

Let me add

Of course the right to strike should be preserved, exactly for the case of these mistakes being made, as no society can be entirely flawless and needs to develop socialist democracy on all levels, in the masses as well as party and state (or whichever variant of socialism you fancy, this still applies).
Yet it's not supposed to be the go to solution of conflicts but an indicator for flaws that need to be overcome.

Correction to the event of '53
The strike took place on June 17th.
Ulbricht apologized for and criticized the measurements the day before.

Auszüge aus einer Rede Ulbrichts auf dem Parteiaktivtag am 16.06.1953 im Friedrichstadtpalast, DDR-Rundfunk, 16.6.1953

rough partial translation
"the change lies in that we decisively change the political line, develop a new political line and assess that in the striving to secure and advance our accomplishments we went too far, we saw too late that the situation didn't allow our pace […]
we didn't consider the will of the people enough […] it is wrong to administratively command higher norms."
17juni53.de/material/otoene.html

facebook.com/thephilosophersmeme/photos/a.1652774414956178.1073741828.1652760244957595/1827459077487710/?type=3

This is some janky-ass socialism you set up.

this

citation needed

Majority rule is a major source of drama and uncertainty. Supermajority popular rule is more stable, iff rule there must be.
Striving is bourgeois. kys liberal