Trump just fired the attorney general

Yeah he's getting the Nixon treatment within the next four years

Probably why he's so paranoid and doing this. Setting an example or some shit.

But he's quickly going to realize that if you can't just "play" politics, not in this age of information everywhere

Nixon committed crimes, Trump made a very probable order with the presumption of Constitutionallity and the DOJ refused to defend it, that is madness.

Every president commits crimes.

...

Nixon could not do the press, Trump is a freak with the press, he's got a better gut than nearly anyone in US history, he's in a bath of acide and he's wagging his finger at them laughing while they scream 'why isn't he melting'.

Dude, that's like…deep

Yeah so was Kennedy

It's telling you that when you start going against the will of deeper intelligence agency powers and plans you quickly run into a wall that either ends with your impeachment or your assassination.

You what?

Yeah if he has good growth in two years they will probably kill him and the press will be like 'oh that sucks'

L o l

I'm saying it was probably constitutional (it is the executive powers are massive in this area), but it carried that presumption anyway and has to be challenged with enough cause, the burden is on the plaintiff.
And the DOJ say's no, we're out, lol. It's ridiculous, it didn't even get to a Higher court ffs.

Does it matter?

It's not.

Yes.

The cointelpro deepens

It is, very likely all parts will survive. What has it got to do with the DOJ not defending something presumed constitutional? Upholding the law means just that, if somethin is illegal, then that is the DOJ role, if something is unconstitutional the only arbiter is the court, as it stands it is lawful and carries the backing of US law.

Sorry, but a president cannot dictate how an Attorney General should or shouldn't interpret constitutional law. Did you even read the statement the WH released?

No and no.

Fuck off back to Holla Forums, you deluded twit.

He didn't you bellend, do you think the DOJ goes into every Supreme court case thinking they are going to win? Notice she didn't say it was illegal, she said it might not be Constitutional, that's a big fucking difference, and the Government needs counsel to defend itself in court to bloody find out if it is constitutional.

Christ sake it doesn't happen because it's a partisan hack trick to pull by someone with weeks left and a career in some NGO signing books on her bravery lol

remember when republicans were constantly whining about federal overreach? lol

Is this constitutional crisis level, or is it normal for American politics?

Civil War when?
Trump is basically debasing the entire centrist power structure.

Don't tell me they are going to let it happen without a fight?

It. Is. Not. Constitutional. There is no "maybe."

Fuck. Back. Off. To. Holla Forums.

Constitutional crisis the likes of which we haven't seen in almost half a century.

This is explicitly the area of Executive perogative.

You.are.retarded. The final arbiter of Constiutionallity is the Supreme court, the order has already been covered by DOJ counsel, this is a complete hack job.

My liberal friend just said this is a "coup de ta" or whatever.

I mean, what does this mean? I'm not sure. Is what he did legal? Is my friend just being hyperbolic and morally outraged?

I'm in need of a non-liberal, pro-communist perspective here that is devoid of liberal moral outrage because I don't trust what liberals say anymore. They flip out about Trump even blinking his eyes now. It's nuts.

Educate me plz

As expected

Lol

there's nothing illegal about Trump firing the AG and Yates probably defied Trump's order knowing that she would be fired.

It's not a "coup de ta" but it still is crazy and almost unprecedented for a president to just dump a AG like this.

The dialectic is in motion. Just enjoy the ride as Western civilization eats itself.

There's Holla Forumsyps shitposting on this board with the leftcom flag.

I think it's because they think "left communist" sounds super lefty.

Basically, something that would never have even been thought of in past times, a political hack job in the guise of a moral objection, to refuse to defend the law of the land, in order to force a Governmental crisis.

Your Liberal friends should be outraged, it's the we go low route on crack.

It's not.

A woman got fired for doing what she thought was her job, her boss disagreed.

Yes

Yes

Like you are now?

Done

You are delusional and your shitty grasp on English betrays the fact that you're probably posting from a Russian IP.

Please fuck off.

they are you dumb shit

The last time a president did this was when he was on the brink of impeachment and power hungry as fuck. Nixon was Hella smarter than Trump though.

twitter.com/VeraMBergen/status/826261999273263105

DNC's response. what is going on?

Liberals need to hang their hypocrisy is fucking disgusting

fucking shit, wrong pic.

Is this real? Pretty strong language for the DNC.

no

see

also
twitter.com/ap/status/826255433149067265

wrong tweet

twitter.com/TheDemocrats/status/826258463114272769

Who'da thought?

Fug ::DD say hello to Putin for me.
And all power to the nazbols!

Not that guy, but it was at least legal. He has that authority given to him by congress in 1952. He can block anyone from entering the US for just about anything he wants. Whether it was constitutional would be up to the SC, but seriously who gives a fucking shit anymore.

Listen to this, bannon is a Leninist and a Machiavellian. He has no rules, and by extension neither does trump. The means justify the ends, these people care about power and that is it. I don't fault the AG for what she did because the commonly held fantasy of law, social norms and the whole silly fucking charade is breaking apart. Do what you can for your cause is the rule right now, don't worry about decorum.

TBH, the president is a dictator. They have just exercised discretion in using their powers.

Okay, Dugin.

what do you mean no? it's real. it's from Zac Petkanas, he's a senior advisor.

F U L L A C C E L E R A T I O N I S M

I'm still confused. So she was breaking the law following her own morals? Or was she challenging the constitutionality of the ban? lurking for answers

Trump has probably already violated the emoluments clause of the constitution by refusing to divest his international hotels and other businesses before assuming office.

Given her statement, it seems like she refused to enforce it both on moral grounds and legal grounds. Unclear yet if it's actually illegal.

Let's see how those career Democrates respond to him now that their careers are at stake.

She can do neither, but she can say that she doesn't think that the orders that were given to her were ethical.

He called himself that in the sense that lenin wanted to destroy the state, and he wants to destroy the state as it is now.
So in absolutely no sense whatsoever is he a leninist, the dipshit

Do people actually unrionically believe this? What the fuck?

Thanks. Can she really say that the orders were unethical though as a legitimate defense? If anything that would seem to tie back to the Constitution (something about duty in there)

Tell your dumbass liberal friend that we already had a coup d'etat. The corporate takeover of the US was started in the '70s and complete by the '90s. It was finished thanks to people like Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.

fucking hell, the co-option of this phrase really bothers me even if it was liberal to begin with

Im not saying he is a communist, I'm saying he doesn't give a shit about "the American state" or whatever. He is an ideologue and thinks of himself as a revolutionary, e.g. called himself a "Leninist" He will push the system to its limits and then break it when it won't budge.

And that isn't a slight against Lenin. He was one of the Mose successful revolutiknaries in history. Banon is very smart to set aside mundane American right wing prejudices to look to Lenin for some kind of guidance in destroying a power structure and rebuilding it.

from what i understand, just think of it as a soldier refusing to follow a commanding officers orders. she probably doesn't have any legal grounds, it's a moral issue.

Did Trump himself write that release?

They think this is their career, this woman will be a millionaire by the end of his first term.

She ordered the DOJ to not defend the Government in court which is way more than I don't agree. If you don't agree you resign or get fired, the AG is and always has been a political office masquerading as an independent one.

When Nixon fired his AG he was fucking breaking into hotels lel not writing bog standard executive perogatives.

The attorney general should have been fired when she decided not to prosecute the fraudulent bankers or housing investors who crashed the economy and threw people out of their homes.

Funny how libs were assmad at Sanders not attending a Muslim ban protest yet don't fucking realize that there's no international flights to Burlington.

She was on the way out anyways, it's pretty insignificant.

In a chain of command if you are an officer and don't think that an order given to you is lawful the people who report to you also don't have to go along with it.

The whole point here is that she didn't think that it was "bog standard".

Lead us to civil war. We're in for it, y'all.

not necessarily. the dems could still block sessions. i know they've been complete failures with every other appointee but they really hate sessions and now they have extra incentive to block him.

...

You have a moral objection, you resign, Department lawyers draughted the thing.Where does the objection end and the shut down of DOJ defending a legal order of the Executive, which has even been argued that they have a case before a court to get standing yet ffs.

If you think somethin is Unconstitutional, the AG sends people to court to defend losing positions worse than this. The moral part is fucking irrelevant. Her morals are not the law, they are hers alone.

So long as borders exist, liberals should suffer their use

Smash the state or suffer it's misuse

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

leftcom is right :^)

you sound like the "don't punch nazis" libs. obstructing in whatever way possible is good when you're dealing with fascists.

Do people really not realize we already live in a lawless society? There's a set of laws used to oppress the 99% and then there's a set of laws that none of those with wealth and power need to follow.

...

Seriously though - how extra dumb are liberals?

Wouldn't a changed leadership that maintained the same staff as the previous leadership raise some red flags?

Wouldn't that show you exactly how fraudulent your "democracy" ever was?

This is basic shit, not lawcucking. She didn't resign, she ORDERED the DOJ to stand down, she didn't even offer a legal argument, she forced the President to fire her, more bravery there.
How do you feel if the AG Trump hand picked is there for a year because the Senate doesn't approve Sessions? Is that good for the rule of law?

Yeah we do, and this cunt hasn't offered a squeak about it for her entire DOJ career.

Not if Repulican power in government continues to grow. If so her network is going to diminish fast. Dems are just banging pots and pans in the hope protestors will fight their battle for them without challanging the Dems globalization interests.

Hello Holla Forums.

lmao no shit buddy you're preaching to the choir here.

Ok, that definitely puts it into perspective. Thanks for the response and not being a condescending cunt.

hey /shillery/, thanks for losing the election

...

he was being sarcastic when he said he was a leninist cause he knew libs would freak out

I never argued the distinction and it's really a semantic point I'm not willing to argue. My opinion on the subject has nothing to do with proper DOJ procedure, especially in a political climate in which more and more "following the rules" is being exposed as just a weakness and to be avoided at all costs.

She was garbage but the outrage is still great to see,

You're not wrong.

Once again liberals confuse real life with things they think will score them political points lmao. Someone who is obviously phoneposting is a Russian (lel) psyop.

And don't come back with >liberals, on leftypol?
A spade is a spade

He's going to be impeached and all he can do is hope this doesn't end in an assanation plot by the CIA

Not even being tinfoil. The state department isn't something you fuck with, and he clearly is angry at parts engineered from when Clinton was in office.

He's fucked. The turkey is done.

Do you get paid per post, per hour, or are you on a salary?

This thread is the perfect case study of why Holla Forumsyps all need to be purged irl

I'd like to see the Republican majority impeach him, then justify it to their base why the impeached the "outsider". And if you think Dems are going to win the midterms your fucking full of yourself because no one takes off from their job just to vote in a midterm election for their bumblefuck House Representative in their Jerrymandered-as-fuck district.

Some Republicans genuinely care about the constitution.

There are some Republicans who would love to impeach Trump cuz that would mean President Mike Pence.

You don't get it.

It was probably the state department which ran all sorts of cold war conspiratorial shit along with other parts of the government.

If you think that this isn't outraging people within it, Trump cannot really get rid of, many, hired by Clinton herself, you're full of yourself.

Trump is firing her as a power play, to show he has power, and he does, from all that new fancy shit they added to the executive branch the last 16 years.

But the more he does this, and the more they can't do anything about it.

Why not just, shoot him, you know?

OMG
He has absolutely NO right to do this!
I'll be marching this weekend, I'm sick of this fascist getting away with it.

And he's threatening tariffs, which I understand he an just will into being as president.
And he's unpopular enough that they could probably handle some deeply triggered liberal into being the fall guy.

If there hasn't been a deep state coup, of course.

Spotted the liberal

you're really bad at blending in

Well then it boils down to do you think Trump is a meanie? The President whether you like him or not, wins an election, the CIA and DNI proceed to try and oust him before the inauguration with claims only Liberals take seriously. Then Obama asks for Protest, meets with the NY judge before the case, them his AG pick tries to cause a crisis before Trump has his own AG.
If the Republicans pulled these strokes on the first Black President I think the reaction would be it's a coup lads, this is crazy, but the press hates Trump so much they are willing to let anything slide, and that is a dangerous scenario when there are people who want him gone ASAP.

ayyy lmao

The problem is his base. It features a core of white supremacists and religious extremists. I've met these bigots before and they never stop flouting how many guns they have or how ready they are to use them. I know it's BS but if Trump was assassinated I'm worried that these bigots would actually do something.

Is this a boys only club or something? :P

Whoops, meant to reply to

...

...

yes, brosocialists only

nice try FBI

Holla Forums is important to be treated like the plot to a metal gear game

They (Democrats) just said he is going to impeached if they get enough seats lol, for a mean law, not an as yet Unconstitutional one. This is what justifies the total overthrow of the transfer of power and pits Deep State against executive. This shit is crazy,

Which gives the hidden powers a great excuse to ramp up repression.

didn't a federal judge already rule it unconstitutional?

And I should cry about deepening state instability and popular unrest/distrust of government because?

If you're really a leftist, justify that as anything but a good thing

Not even close, the injunction was related to one person, and the rational she gave (this is the judge who met with Obama before the case) was the Government didn't think about it enough, it was nonsense, and not a hearing on it's Constiutionallity.

I'm not, I'm an anti-neo con and these pieces of shit are trying to pull a coup.

show me a leftist movement in America popular enough to take advantage of these things

It's more likely than you think, the GOP despises Trump and in the white house they're already being forced out by Miller, Bannon, and Kushner in terms of how much access they get to Trump and how much say they have on the policies

Also, the press will defend it and memory hole it, and all will be back to the two party Democrats corporate dick licking, wars, Syria invasion, TPP etc

Could be a good thing, could be a worse than we currently have thing. Without a plan to go on, it's the always the latter.

...

Not even close.

You think the power will fall anywhere near that if there is a defacto coup or some crazy shit goes down? It will be Corey fucking Brooker or controlled Warren

is that your grandma? :0

Stop using that flag.

never said that

People here actually believe the Russian conspiracy horseshit. It's too far gone.

I think Booker and Warren overplayed their hands early and are hemorrhaging support even from dyed in the wool liberals.

Hillary voters largely feel betrayed and angry and confused and a substantial portion will not be so quick to trust

Now don't be wrong plenty of braindead liberals still but the real economic hurt is coming and it's the material condition that drives real populist change

it's telling that liberals freak out over Trump's supposed ties to Russia but never mention KSA.

Saud family and Putin can all go die tbh. I'm tired of grading world leaders on a curve of shitty to less shitty

it's not like Russians ever manipulated Leftists for their own agenda.

Ruthlessly holding liberals to their own law helps in loosening their grip on society and the legitimacy of their ideology. Did you take a wrong turn at >>>/liberalpol/ by mistake?

Insiders don't criticize other insiders, said Larry Summers to Elizabeth Warren.

RELEASE IT

Trump also replaced the acting direction of immigration enforcement

msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-replaces-acting-director-of-immigration-enforcement/ar-AAmr71H?li=BBnb7Kz

Warren seems depressing as fuck but it's the best we're "reasonably" going to get. I put that in quotes because some completely unreasonable candidacies happened in the past year.

Tell Liberals to punch them and get your own guns ffs. Shits going down in the next 10 years, maybe less.

yeah we're gonna get a string of emboldened celebrities and cuckerberg style "hip" corporatists instead

we're seriously fucked

...

this shit has to stop

someone needs to get trump to stop running a twitter account

Trump being a crybaby on twitter is the only good thing about his presidency so far

Trump is definitely overplaying his hand right now. Either he honestly believes that he's secretly super popular or he's convinced that the democrats will never oppose him in a meaningful wayalthough to be fair that last one is true

Obama's existence is was a constitutional crisis…

woah……………………..

...

and letting facism take over unobstructed does what exactly? this has nothing to do with liberals. obstructing is the right move against trump no matter who you are.

every president shits on the constitution, Trump is the only one dumb enough to do it so brazenly.

No!

If there's one thing this election has shown, it's that this president is shit at fucking doing conspiracies and it's so obvious that actual conspirators, like the CIA, are going to get his bed shitting ass cold white quick

He's either not going to like it, or become so pale with fear that he acts out

So in other words, this is going to be fun.

hello liberal

Yes!

hello Holla Forums

tbh, every day of his presidency so far has been a rollarcoaster of a ride in terms of things he's doing
I'm just waiting for him to cause a stock crash with a tweet

But yeah, he's way overreaching, the other presidents were far less brazen in their maneuvers

Sad!

Accelerationism

Are you honestly 12 years old? Start from just Bush and Obama and look at their raping of the Constitution, Trump did it to NON citizens, they destroyed your civil liberties, the next President can undo a ban on muslims but not the Patriot Act,NDAA or the propaganda bullshit Obama allowed in just recently.

The CIA will make Trump delete his twitter

Were there references to Islam in the bans or not? I keep hearing contrary information on this.

The CIA will do as I say, believe me. I'm a leader!

No
It just banned entry from those countries and accepting refugees

The CIA doesn't listen to the president :)

The CIA is probably going to make Trump delete his life tbh.

No, 7 countries with no Government or under Jihad influence, and Iran.

lol

in the actual order, no. but trump said publicly that Christians would receive less vetting than muslims and giuliani also said publicly that trump came to him and said he wanted to do the muslim but he needed to know how to do it legally.

Then why do they keep calling it a Muslim ban?

Had a great meeting at CIA Headquarters yesterday, packed house, paid great respect to Wall, long standing ovations, amazing people. WIN!

I'm surprised that the CIA hasn't hacked his twitter and started trolling. It'd be a great warning and there's no way they don't have the password.

because off-paper that's what it is

That;s why the butthurt about his private security lel, the press is furious he just doesn't shoot himself twice.

They don't care anymore this is regime change

It sells better and provokes outrage
tbh, it's entirely political, the list of nations is either nations opposed to the US or nations that were destroyed by the US

If I was someone in the CIA I would hack it and just post "Donald Trump will die in 7 days", and have him log in and freak the fuck out

The Brits also want to use it to fuck over Brexit.

If you believe liberalism is worth saving, it is your duty and obligation to get out there and obstruct its challengers. Those of us who prefer that markets serve people instead of the other way around will honor your sacrifice.

regardless of calling him a fascist, a moron, evil, controlling, overreaching, whatever… one thing is pretty much true, and I hate to sat it:
"Trump is the only president in my life who is actually keeping his campaign promises"
Granted, his promises were pretty shitty. But hes actually keeping them.
Executive Order 13765
Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Regulatory Freeze
Also:
Executive Order: Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs
Presidential Memorandum: Withdrawal of the United States From the Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations and Agreement
Presidential Memorandum: Mexico City Policy
Presidential Memorandum: Hiring Freeze (its just the start)
Executive Order 13766
Presidential Memorandum:Streamlining Permitting and Reducing Regulatory Burdens for Domestic Manufacturing
Executive Order 13767
Executive Order 13768
Executive Order: Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States
Executive Order: Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Employees (Granted, stopping congressmen and senators from becoming lobbyists is in my opinion the only good thing he's done, it is kinda outweighed by the fact that his cabinet has top financial execs on it)
National Security Presidential Memorandum 3: Plan to Defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria

Im not supporting any of this, but I gotta say… he is doing ALOT of shit, and most of it is keeping campaign promises.

I wish any other president I've lived to see would have been the one to keep campaign promises instead of Trump

i never said shit about liberalism, idk what the fuck you guys are even talking about at this point

cause it's banning muslims

Off-paper doesn't matter.
They can't just imply he is doing something illegal when he is not.
That's irresponsible as hell.

...

kind of, kind of not.
Its the denial of entry to the US to travelers from seven islamic states. The order does not actually ban muslims. symanitcs, I know, but there is a difference.

everyone ever has made this joke

I agree with this. the ban is not on muslims. Its a ban on travelers from seven islamic nations, which happen to be considered the most ""radicalized"" countries.

Not the I support it, I really dont care one way or the other. But the point is, there is no "ban on muslims" that is simply media sensationalism

wow I'm so happy we can have Saudi Princes instead of war refugees

Thanks donald trump

Unless he say's no muslims, he can ban any country, any time, he has the scope. I couldn't give a shit about a three month wait time if I was President I'd want zero attacks and not trust the previous regimes dons to not fuck shit up.
Saudi and Egypt are Vassel states as was Pakistan when it comes to doing checks, the idea Drumpf is earning money in Pakistan and Saudi and Egypt, not that they are obvious military allies, is fucking retarded and Journalists do not care. This is about his money they think not the past 20 years fucking around in the middle east?

he's been in office for a week. if you can't see that this is just the seeds being planted for escalation, i'm not sure what you're doing here

Escalation to what, he will focus on the economy and deregulation once his campaign shit is done, then healthcare.

it's not about HIS money, it's about America's money. that whole business interests shit that libs are going on about is irrelevant.

i know what he CAN do. this isn't about what he can do though. the president has so much executive power at this point and that he can legally do pretty much whatever he wants. that's the issue.

Your putting words in my mouth. Im simply making the point there is no executive order stating "ban on muslims" there is only an executive order stating "ban on people from certain countries".
There is a difference, and if you cant see that, im not sure what your doing here

yeah, sure. check in again after the next terrorist attack.

an executive order saying "ban on muslims" would be blatantly illegal and would never hold up in any court. this is the close he can without breaking the law or pissing off the saudis.

Because even Trump knows that an exec order that just says "ban all muslims" would never fly.

This is the most autistic president we've ever had in office

We can tell you're liberal from your bourgeois interests, your performative Crusades rhetoric, and your self-regard. Liberalism is the enemy until its overclasses stop excusing themselves from the same duties of unfailing obedience it so fiercely demands of its underclasses. Until then, if liberals don't hate fascism enough to stop resisting socialism, let them eat cake.

Well checked. About time neurotypicals were subjected to some restorative justice.

I'm honestly so tired of people defending trump and not being called liberals themselves

point at large, is its still not a "ban on muslims". If your theory were accurate he would have included all the other muslim majority countries instead of only the ones with the highest rate of radicalization

Except that none of the countries on the ban are doing terrorist attacks against America right now-it has nothing to do with stopping radical Islam, it's about pushing regime change.

Except that's for the excutive to decide who is doing what not the courts, they rule strictly on is in ultra vires Executive power.

you mean Saudi Arabia?

Well it's not semantics, because there are a lot of other Islamic majority countries that are not banned.

requesting the graph with the number of terrorist attacks springing from respective countries on the US (included and not included in the ban)

This is called cognitive dissonance. Trump is banning Muslims! He's not banning Muslims!

You're missing the point. You're treating this like it's anything but a distraction, and attempt to appeal to chauvinist Americans with a romanticized ideal of America that has never existed, but is usually associated with a monocultural economic boom.

Liberals don't count Islamic terrorist attacks as terrorist attacks. For example, the Florida nightclub shooter is not on that chat.

Yes– lets turn to the real America that definitely did exist. The ove depicted in Marvel Studios Captain America. There is nothing more American than punching nazis!

? yes they do ?

I don't want to turn to any idealized America, I want communism. You're arguing about the semantics of the order rather than treating it what it is, a distraction. It's not meaningful in anyway, it's not going to make America safer. It's a distraction. It appeases his supporters, while shifting the """lefts""" narrative to "muh Trump" castrating the momentum we gained from Bernie.

Go away Holla Forums.

literally retarded

They don't. San Bernardo and Florida are apparent not terrorist attacks

what the fuck are you talking about? who said they weren't terrorist attacks?

the difference is the Orlando was done by a guy from New York and the San Bernardino shooter was from Chicago and his wife was from Pakistan, which isn't on the ban list.

...

back to Holla Forums dipshit, it wasn't a chart of how spooky brown people are

My point is about how it's judged, and what behavior is acceptable. This AG is now a hero, watch CNN and see if they have any of the reasonable points made by posters in this thread, or if this is Trump Fascism and he needs to be impeached.
People are in the streets about the wrong fucking thing.

...

this is why the left keeps losing

Apparently Tillerson and Mattis are basically not hearing about these executive orders until Trump has signed them. Bannon is literally running the US.

saudi arabia is not a recognized terrorist state. its considered friendly to US in general

She actually stood up for the Constitution and the law. It's illegal to do what he did with The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. It's also unconstitutional to hold people in America (citizens or not, actually) without due process.

When he was swearing in were those alternative facts too?

Wrong. Don't know what libs are going to do when it's declared constitutional by the Supreme Court

Oh boy, wait until you hear.

fug

Probably because it is.

youtube.com/watch?v=aGOwEOTYfuE

Under the 14th amendment non-citizens have Constitutional rights.

They don't have the right to not be deported lol

"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the muh privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

You're interpretation of this means that it's literally unconstitutional to turn someone away from the border, you realize that?

Trump settled his massive fraud cases before he was even sworn in. The guy is an actual conman. Add onto that the emoluments clause, and the fact that he's already outdone one of the most controversial Obama moves by killing the 8-year-old sister of the 16-year-old American who was famously killed under Obama.

Add on that the US has had expanded warrantless surveillance and murder power since Bush, and used these to expand spying on political opposition. And spying on political opposition in-and-of itself was actually a bit of a tradition since even before Nixon. It's hard for Trump to pull a Nixon, because if Watergate happened today it would probably be legal or at least "legal." He's operating at a lower bar, and he still has trouble not breaking the law.

a recognized one

For a conman he's playing it pretty straight lol.

Source?

That family sure is terroristy

theintercept.com/2017/01/30/obama-killed-a-16-year-old-american-in-yemen-trump-just-killed-his-8-year-old-sister/

: (

America truly is in its Weimar phase

I expect rule by decree by the 2020s

coup d'etat

Not a citizen, and the raid doesn't make sense when they arm these people in Syria, but why are these fucking retards around their soldier parents and not grandparents who you think would learn a thing after the first time.

So is this actually a big deal or is it just bourgeois drama?

If the mainstream media talks about it in any depth beyond a passing mention at a time of day when nobody is watching, it's probably just political theater.

For fucks sake, user, I didn't come here for feels.
Serously, when do we get to hang these fucks.

...

...

And, the Left actually helped get a lot of reactionary burgers to fight against fascism in WWII and help spread socialism throughout the world. It's far more then the anti-communist, anti-Russian "new" left ever accomplished. Praise Stalin.

Only a small minority of the world's Muslims have been banned. Stop buying into liberal hysteria.

/backlash/ intensifies.

his handlers are telling him "no dont worry you're super popular, you're the coolest dude with the highest Autism Level, all criticism is fake news, now sign these". i honestly think that when they throw him to the wolves he will have no idea what happened.

He's clearly smart and plays dumb to trick people.

Trumples will never let it go, immediate civil war in the US to be honest. Tensions between the left and the right are already too high, thank you neoliberal corporate media and Hillshills.

I think they would lose, honestly. The state is way too powerful at this point, and most of the country doesn't feel that strongly about him to begin with.

did you actually just make this argument?

Hahaha. What percentage of military men do you think supports Trump?

I'd guess about a quarter to a third, but iirc it varies by branch and subsequently education level.

That won't happen. 60 million folks voted Trump and still can't be arsed to protest in his favour meanwhile liberals and fake leftists do the retarded march women. Where the fuck are the Trump voters?
If Trump was killed they woudl just shrug and go on with their lifes. Only the very huge demography of Holla Forumstards from 8ch and halfchan would march to the streets.

Try 2/3.

Protest what exactly? Join arms and make a human wall in support of his order to build a wall?

Trump is not a retard, otherwise he wouldn't have been elected.
I used to think he was dumb too, but no, he's quite intelligent, far more intelligent that most elected leaders out there, the likes of Trudeu, Merkel or Hollande. I changed my opinion when i saw him making a speech over how in the latest terms there's always some financial crisis. Trump is aware that the next financial crisis is coming soon. Something that almost nobody in the mainstream media is aware of.

If anyone could come into the safe, rich western nations that allow for anons on Holla Forums to think what they do then you would all be either raped, robbed, beaten, killed or a combination of the four. Not a single one of you has ever lived in a third world nation for 6 months, you are basing all your ideas on people being like you, they aren't. You are food to them.

Prove me wrong, move to the congo for 6 months, then tell me about open borders.

When lefties insist that only fascists will support borders, then voters will hire fascists to do the job lefties won’t do.

When did he say this? Source?

How much salt is Holla Forums gonna release when the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 is repealed?

...

[muffled orks vs humans in the distance]
fuck off back to Holla Forums you racist shit.

the repeal of this particular piece of bourgeois would absolutely destroy Holla Forums. it's the greatest achievement of cultural marxism since the russian revolution

curse you trump. curse you! your mastery of poly dimensional super string mouse trap can't be allowed to thwart the ultimate aim of marxism: providing free healthcare and college to everyone

It's not going to be repealed fake nazbol. The GOP loves that shit and does porky.

Mean while on the eve of WWII Stalin made peace with facists then got stabed in the back because of it.

Happy voters don't protest

Are you nuts?