Now that GTA VI has been confirmed, where do you expect it to take place...

Now that GTA VI has been confirmed, where do you expect it to take place? I would be very surprised if it DOESNT take place in Vice City and the surrounding area.

Other urls found in this thread:

businessinsider.com/gta-grand-theft-auto-6-rockstar-game-2017-7
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I'm personally expecting they're going to make another city to set it in. I can imagine that Rockstar doesn't like everyone immediately predicting what they're going to do with every future game they make.

Source?

businessinsider.com/gta-grand-theft-auto-6-rockstar-game-2017-7

tl;dr some actor's resume mentions it

it will be gta 5 with less features and they will sell missions as dlc

Nope

They'll just make a GTAOnline-2

Pozville

Japan
I also like how every mockup uses the mirrored GTA IV number

...

...

If you faggots are actually giving r* your money after the shit they recently pulled you all deserve what you get.

Beijingi hope

Skyrim

Didn't Cockstar say it might take place in Hong Kong?

Pretty sure they said they want to keep the series in America

They should make it in San Fran, they'd sell millions of copies just for being able to slaughter hipster SJWs.

Someplace other than America.
If european maybe a different time period so it isn't filled with fucking muslims.

In some tranny mst riddled asshole.
gta is over, rockstar is no more.

lol, not even remotely confirmed

San Fierro might be too close to Los Santos, honestly. It was also the most boring city in San Andreas.

...

Hong Kong
I just want a Sleeping Dogs 2, fuck you Square

...

The graphics and acting are pretty good in the trailer.

...

CJ was a better protagonist than any of the guys from 4 or 5.

probably the only gta player character with a moral compass as well

Highly unlikely seeing as Rockstar said that GTA 5 doesn't take place in Japan because (((the Streets would have been too narrow))) Besides, that's way too creative for Rockstar.

He decided to start drinking again when he found himself helpless and useless as he couldn't console his best friend Colin, who came to him about his son chopping his dick off. Sadly the point don't matter.

fuck, i miss that show when it was good

There was also Vic from Vice City Stories.

oh SEEEJAAAY, ya'll being one muthafuckin uncle TAWM. Fuk de POWLEESE.

Not-Vegas would be fun.

I'm more interested who the protag is gonna be or if they pull 5 again and have 3 or more equally dull cliched cunts to go with.
i wouldnt mind a grill as the protag as long as it's not a sassy negress or latino, maybe redhaired Irish-chick or … well Russians are out of the picture because reasons

I don't care where they put this game, i'm sure I will be disappointed on all fronts.

damn it, I want another GTA London! especially set in CY+5 when the mudslime hordes have completely taken over

Nice > Every other GTA character
Make dealings

Your mom's pussy, there is more than enough space.

...

Why not a prosperous Middle Eastern city, like Dubai, Istanbul, or London, like the first ones?

...

Let's all hope it's in the past to spare me all the trump presidency, sjw and anti-sjw references. please

It could be set on the fucking moon during a zombie apocalypse and I wouldn't give a fuck.

No it won't be set in Japan because it's American satire.

And nobody takes risks these days.

That could be actually nice

We're not that lucky.

Why not the turkish-city, Frankfurt?

What

Las Venturas
That way Rockstar won't be able to get away with not having fucking gambling minigames

I want it set in chimpcago or detroit but no way in hell will Rockstar manage to exploit properly such a piss easy setting. I also expect it to be GTA online 2: electric Jewgaloo and barely have a single player mode. GTAO was the final hooked nail in the coffin.

I'll admit, I do want something to scratch my sandbox itch, but R* and Volition are fucking dead.

Assuming they don't just rehash Vice City, Texas has pretty nice places.

No, that's where Bully 2 is going to take place.

...

Wasn't that Donald Love?

But that's River City Ransom

It will be pure poz with Leslie gone.

I sure can't wait for more Open World™ cancer

Also why can't these huge retards make a fucking GTA in a relevant country that isn't a fucking boring place that we haven't visited a centillion times already?
You know, a country from the fucking Balkans or even Russia for example would be much better.

Don't touch Japan though. I don't want to see what kind of cancer Western developers would come up with in a GTA set in Japan. Yakuza does it better already.

I hope they make a Japan one so they can further destroy and westernize Nippon

>if you're a guy you can try and find girls to pimp out or trick yourself out

San Andreas still has two other cities in it for them to exploit. Gaystar know they shouldn't violate the holy vessel of the best GTA game being Vice City. They'll probably do San Fiero.

Bangkok, Moscow or Rome would be pretty decent.
But I expect they'll take the path of least effort and shit out a (((next-gen))) version of something we've already seen.

What was 3 based on?

NYC primarily, although with some Detroit, Philadelphia and Baltimore mixed in.

I think it was.
But that was before he became literally Hitler.

If they are doing Vice City again it better be set in the 80's or 70's.
Or maybe they will skip Vice City entirely and set it in San Fiero.
Vicy City will be a DLC map for the online.

You just described Red Dead Redemption

...

Guys, guys - what if they set in the future and we get Grand Theft Bladerunner.
Would you be opposed to that?

...

The girl to be delivered is a pornstar named "Platinum"

GTA VIce City

Hitler dubs confirm
this is Rockstar we're talking about, all they care about is being edgy and generating controversy wich they use as a publicity boost
if there is a wall the possibility of a "help the wetback" kind of mission is just as likelly as the posiblilty of a "RWDS" kinda mission
The more people GTA pisses off
The more GTA fanboys will love Rockstar for it

The main character will be a border hoping mexican looking for "a better life" in the US, and the second main character will be a corrupt border patrol officers and they need to team up for some reason to take down the cartel operating in the area.
The third main character can be whatever that gets dragged in to cartel business by a failed deal.

it works in my head

Nah, they will reuse GTA IV engine again, It will take 2 years tops to make this game.

Vice City would be guaranteed money, doubly so if they redo the 80s. However, I feel they actually like to try new things, at least with settings and dates.

I can't really see them dropping the phone mechanic though. Its become too integral to their games now, with constant dialogue, missions, menus, internet etc. its a central part of GTA now. I'd be happy for them to move away from it, maybe do 70s Las Venturas and surrounding towns and desert.

well this doesnt look good

THE RESUME IS FAKE YOU IDIOTS
GTA VI HAS NOT BEEN CONFIRMED

it was already confirmed you fucking imbeciles

If the main character's gay even for a joke im done.

It's gonna be Vice City.

This would be my choice, honestly. Tons of potential, great visuals, established as a city with deep crime roots, historical precedent in the GTA series, etc.

Either that or Seattle I guess, but Seattle is full of fucking hills that would make driving or doing anything at speed a living nightmare.

t. Seattle user

It'll probably be shit seeing as they've lost their original writer we'll probably get a chinese knockoff or a game with no soul seeing as we'll lose the dark atmosphere. Also this leak is fake

Might as well make her a hooker/dancer too then imo. Could be she was the favorite of the engineer who did all the OPSEC/networks/password management/etc for most of the big casinos. She knows a way to get into all the casinos systems or at least where to find a way to.

...

Fuck off, GTA IV was garbage. The """dark atmosphere"""" added nothing but a shitty gray filter to make the game not even resemble NYC. (hint: NYC IRL has colour, especially Manhatten)

every GTA after San Andreas has less and less content

Also, Rockstar are crypto liberals.

That's why you apply a *light* coating of ENB.
Shitty skybox aside, this screenshot almost looks like reality. The texture work is top notch, from the stains on the side of the stairs to the bent vents on the second floor air conditioner.

...

I don't believe those are the default textures, and even if they are they'd fall apart when you get within 5-10 meters of them.

I have no comment on the textures, but I don't think there's many replacement packs out there to begin with. Even if they are the defaults and the defaults are low-res, they still did a great job. There's an actual variety there. The last screenshot is obviously unmodded.

GTA: Anchor Point

The new installment of the GTA series will take place in Frontier State and will include survival, exploring the last frontier, and everything else we know and expect from the GTA series. Following from GTA 5, there will be a cast of three characters to play as again, A Russian, a typical white american, and native to the lands of Frontier State.

Expect to use airplanes, helicopters, and boats more often as some places are inaccessible by road. Explore the large wild land and discover its darker side.

...

Wherever it is, its going to be the same shit
Rockstar takes zero risk with GTA

It hits all the memes of modern video gaming.

a hacker, cracker, and a casino owner

I liked Niko

GTA 5 had one "city"
GTA 3 had 3
GTA 4 had 3
San Andreas had like 5

let that sink in

If they remake Vice City its only going to get smaller because shitty console can't handle it. That fucking draw distance and shit popping in on consoles is hilarious in GTA games.

Calling it now, it'll be in Washington DC and you get to kill a Trumpesque figure.

you some sort of retard?

Quality>quantity dumbass. Everything outside of Los Santos is boring and pointless in GTAV. GTASA had San Fierro and Las Venturas, which are shitloads as fun as Los Santos

I can't handle this shit, just die in a fire please

3 islands (theres 2 littler ones but they dont count. (if youre talkin GTA4. its same for GTA3 except with only 1 little island)

Is that map even properly scaled?
San Andreas was 14 Sq mi

GTA V is 50 sq mi

I like GTA Vs world a lot morw tbh. Rockstar did a fantastic job at avoiding "too much empty space" syndrome. Nothing in GTA V is truly "empty" even the places it SHOULD be empty like the desert are filled with stunt trails, mobile homes, and hiking trials with padestrians

That said I do think San Andreas had a superior atmosphere and Rockstar did a great job at making the map feel bigger than it was. But even then San Andreas had a fucking hell of a lot more empty unused space than GTA V. Don't fucking pretend it didn't when parts of Bone country were quite literally endless blank sand.

Also Bronx, Harlem, Staten Island and shit are technically their own cities, if you're thinking real life. LA and Las Vegas are the same way. (Hollywood/long beach/etc, North Vegas/Summerlin/Henderson/etc)

everything along the east/north/west coast is pointless and the middle section is only fun to fuck about around for a few minutes. idk what you're talkin bout

You're not wrong. But we should be differentiating between "City Proper" and "Metropolitan Area" to avoid confusion

Los Angeles is both a City Proper and a Metropolitan Area for example. The Metropolitan Area or "Greater Los Angeles" for example is the largest in the country in terms of total area covered (second on terms of population behind New York) and covers everything from Lancaster up north to Irvine down south

yes, and the quality of the single city and countryside in 5 greatly outdoes the other games.

I call BS on that. San Fierro and Las Venturas have more variety within each of them than the entirety of GTAV, with the exception of Los Santos.

In fact, GTA SA's Los Santos has more map variety than GTAV's Los Santos, what with the beach section, the north east latino district, the central ballas hood, Grove to the south, the industrial region, Vinewood, and finally the airport

Play the game again, San Fierro is very bland and empty. IIRC long before GTA V was even announced I remember reading on the wiki that Sam Fierro was the last city Rockstar addes to the game and was heavily rushed as a result. They made up for it with all the easter eggs they out in the city though

Man my phone screen is so fucking oily I can't type for shit

If you think Size = Content, then you best move the fuck over cause LA Noire has the best map of all time for a GTA style game


You've never played GTA SA have you?
1) the airport, golf park, and stadium
2) the bars and gay town southwest
3) the hotels and Zero's west
4) the construction site and train station
5) the docks and military bay to the east
6) the north east park and michelles
7) the steep hills and chinatown northwest
8) the bridge and Jizzys north north west

all off the top of my head cause this is where I'm at on my phone's GTASA atm.

can you list all the major sections of GTAV's Los Santos??

Alabama

I'll wait, bruh

Still waitin, bruv

pretty fucked moral compass…


put the enb settings in the bag, or else

But goy we need to get all the goyim to spend $60 extra and to buy their shark coins all over again

What is this supposed to prove exactly?
San Fierro is the least interesting city in San Andreas. And GTAV, of course, has more interesting spots than anything in san andreas because of the fact that just more shit and detail can be crammed into a game made for a more powerful console.

New York is a collection of different cities combined to be one unholy mega city

GTA V is shit, it is nothing compared to the Yakuza series

Yakuza autists need not apply

no its not moron

Maybe you think that because you've never been out of the city
When I think of NYC I think of a drab, lifeless place

Oh and Fort Worth and Dallas are the same city

Nothing wrong with Autism, GTAV fag

God, I hope Holla Forums gives it the Overwank treatment. San Andreas is my favorite game and a Slavic modders paradise that has come to be a work of art in itsself, 5 was so fucking bad and they jewed Lesie so hard I hope the shit ass company burns to the ground.

...

prove me wrong jew

...

NYC reeks of piss

Everyone knows he was faking it in order to get emoneys

Seems like we played a different game mongoloid.

San Andreas is fucking empty.
Everything in both IV and V has quality and attention in every single fucking area.

San Andreas is a great game for a whole lot of reasons, but it does not have a good map.

this is better

ryan is sexy IM A FAG

No shit, its buffer zone for driving your cars, even the badlands or even mt. Chilliad are a gamey racing tracks for driving your vechicles masked behind a real life set, relative to content and core map size there's absolutely fuck all to do in five and fuck all to go, except for what, maybe darts in a bum fuck no where bar? Even the "empty space" has its own quirks, five has jack shit and frankly you should fuck off back to reddit if you can even entertain the notion of it being a superior game to San Andreas.
WEW lad, name me one map that comes CLOSE, for a game from 2004.

Also it was one of the first to allow you to fly, young faggot. It was small as it was high up, didn't need the player shooting faster through it.

both of you need to commit suicide

Are you fucking stupid or something?
The game is exactly the fucking same, except the map is actually fun to drive through because there's a lot more detail.

And that's without counting the online where you can actually build races and deathmatches using these already incredibly fleshed out areas for additional user created content.

You don't need to pay a dime to get into deathmatches or races. No, you're not forced to use your own car for every race, despite what some faggot might have told you on Holla Forums.

Oblivion has a better map than san andreas, and it was made in 2006.

...

You were warned about spamming your channel motherfucker. Warned in King of the Hill chat.

Next thing that will happen is a fake copyright claim on your YT account then ur doxxed kiddo.

king of the hill chat???

This.

Maybe bay area and Sacramento of California…then release a GTA California as GTA VII.

Maybe Washington D.C. Easy wins about a DC GTA. So many people want to kill feds.

They have needed a GTA Earth for a while now.

They also need to include the instant regrowth of missing body technologies to other characters than only the playable characters (health restoration).

...

pleb

fag

when will they make a game that look 100% realistic like real life?

goy

Honestly I only did it to piss off GTA fag

r/gaming is that way you retarded blind faggot.
OK I'm just bullying a chromosome hoarder now.

...

Don't reply to reddit summer scum user.

Oops.

GTA has sucked dick since San Andreas

oke


There's fuckall to do in San andreas too, are you actually being serious right now or can you actually not see the hypocrisy in your posts.

Wow now that is a great point.
Once again, the game is exactly the same, the one improvement is in the attention to detail in the map. If you're autistic and can't even admit it then that's too bad for you.
What are the oh-so-amazing activities you can do in San Andreas in its empty ass map?
I know you can collect clams, damn that sure was a good addition, I know EVERYONE loved doing that.

I wonder why I even bother responding to fags that can't even come up with arguments and go straight to calling people reddit, leftypol, pol, cuckchan or whatever boogeyman they can muster up.

Maybe if you actually played the games you talk about you'd actually be able to not sound like a retard. But you clearly haven't.

I've never had any performance issues running vanilla GTA 4. Maybe you should try getting a job. Anyway, I'm not about to put actual effort into debating with anyone dumb enough to buy a console.

Unlike you I can own both a good PC AND a ps3 AND a ps2 to play ALL the good games.

right

Pool, dating, arcade games, arena racing and dirt biking, hovercrafting, two player fuck around, gang wars and cruising with a bus load of your homies, way better cheats, way more cars, better and more aesthetic customization, better soundtrack, in contrast to yoga, dad golf, and MUHH SHARKCARD MONEYZ GRIND. Funny how you haven't listed one point except for "detail" but cry when anons tell you to fuck off to reddit, shooting a paint can and watching subpar dripping effects isn't as fun when it looks like a demo of the euphoria engine in comparison to Max Payne 3 which should've been the fucking demo.
I know you can play tennis and invest in stocks, gee so gangster, THE DETAIL DUDEEE.

...

He's defending GTA Online after all.

You must be actually stupid.

It refutes the EMPTY MAP argument you idiot, I'm not arguing with the mong who champions oblivions perfectly geometrical bridges with a slapped on brick texture on it and copy pasted shit in comparison with three beautiful cities fleshed out, textured and squeezed on a ps2. You clearly didn't play it.

But all the shit you posted is also in V, apart from shitty pool and arcade games which have been replaced by different stuff.

How can the map be fucking empty when the whole map is filled with places that have been made into activities by the activity creator?
Or does that just not exist because booo hooo muh gta online?

Jesus christ if you actually have to use "go around with your homies in a bus" and gang wars into the things to do (which mind you you can only do in Los Santos, then you fucking know that you're strapped for content.

V has hundreds of different customization for cars because of constant updates, and you somehow try to convince me SA has better vehicle customization? Are you fucking stupid or something?

And jesus fuck, the two player mode barely fucking works, you can't even have split screen. The only thing that was even CLOSE to being entertaining in the two player mode was the decapitated head glitch.

Fuck off, you're just repeating shit you've heard. You've got no point, you're either blinded by nostalgia or just fucking retarded.

why would you even try to compare the two?
Yakuza has gameplay, story, and characters.

Not only does GTAV's map have less unique areas, hot damn, its areas are cherrypicked af. This map lists single buildings and splits the beach into to halves just to try and make it seem like it has more shit.

GTAV fags will still say it has more content tho haha>>13129413

R* is going to spend as much money as they will spend on Game Dev on Advertisement, even though they would make as much money as they would with Advertisement by not advertising.

Rather than to fix the glaring issues such as hacking/cheating/ they will just blindly ban people with zero tolerance, and zero forgiveness.

R* are such Jews they will threaten to sue people for trying to enable private servers because the hacking is so bad, and how R* refuses to address the issue.

R* will also charge full price for the game 4 years later except for once a year sales, even though rock star blindly bans people for hacking because they simply had an encounter with hackers.

So is it gonna star a female character? And will it be shit?

That's because you think of nigger ghettos you idiot, and even they have lots of color in certain areas, especially with graffiti. Even when it's colorless it's never gray, it's brown.

It's also funny how you think it's lifeless when it's literally nicknamed "the city that never sleeps"

Are you retarded?

You forgot to add they will ban people for using mods.