What solutions does communism offer for the horrific oppression stemming from the sexual free market?

What solutions does communism offer for the horrific oppression stemming from the sexual free market?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=PHQLQ1Rc_Js&list=RDPHQLQ1Rc_Js#t=3
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Jeremy Corbyn will finish the work of the Russian revolution by instituting state-issued gfs.

this

low birth rates are symptomatic of the atomized and anxiety driven capitalist system. when women can have babies without being worried about how to support them financially more people will find partners.

That sounds quite retarded, some people actually have standards and don't settle because they have self worth and don't need to make kids and family to feel like they achieved something.
What the hell are they trying.

Also being gay is even worse since less possible partners

The headline is from the express or some other gutter-rag.

no reputable newspaper describes guidelines as "barmy"

maybe people should stop being betafags and actually talk to potential mates like normal humans? I have my autistic tendencies and desires, but I'm empathetic and have a backbone and am able to hold a conversation with people.

Besides, for those that can't get any mates, the waifu age is almost upon us

...

I don't know if I'm tired or what, but I can't parse that statement at all

...

There seems to be one guy on this board now that responds to everything with "Trump is a fascist" no matter the context.

excuse you nigger, I believe you have me confused with an anarcho-transhumanist ancrap shitter. I'm a transhumanist with a love of technology, and technology is ideologically neutral.

Hey Holla Forums

Why did I have to be on the machine that doesn't have any zizek's saved?

Anyway, watch Adam Curtis's series "Pandora's Box" about the interaction between politics and technology. It's great.

Technology is in practice highly ideological because it's shaped by prevailing ideologies. The form that technology takes is inherently reflective of the desires of the time, which is in turn reflective of overarching ideology.

The user-tracking technology of Facebook isn't some neutral algorithm, it's an ideological statement about (against) privacy in the name of capitalism. Technology is as politically neutral as economics.

Don't obsess over privacy, it isn't something that is great, privacy breeds hypocrisy and corruption.

Though yes in this specific instance it is dangerously against the people

I'll have to look into that, but regardless, technology is a tool and I don't like being pigeonholed for appreciating it, I personally believe our survival as a human species and as a human concept will depend on it, especially with climate change and other events.

free association

...

You might be right though, I'm sure there are a few other reddit newfags here who are so stuck in their twitter-induced outrage cycles that they can't think of anything other then Trump. Try to keep it on topic next time or don't eventually people will figure out that your autistic and/or shilling

And no, I'm not Holla Forums, I just happen to have been here before the reddit influx when the discourse was of a much higher quality.

...

Sorry but anyone who unironically suggest Trump is anything but a nationalistic fascist lying capitalist is Holla Forums.
The only positive thing is that he ll bring more people to the left, the issue is whenever or not he ll fuck shit up too much, he already literally suggests that we should only listen to him and everyone else is lying aka classic fascism, he is deep into idpol with le poor misunderstood white voter.

I wasn't criticizing your appreciation of technology, I was criticizing this part specifically


sounds like bootstrapism applied to social relations to me

you seem confused this is not a liberal board

You seem to be confused, this isn't a fascist and trump cocksucking board

Incel uprising when?

ok, versus the type of social relations that are innate? People aren't blank slates true, but there's a certain point where you have to get your balls up and go out in the world and do shit. Even under a socialist utopia, people aren't going to just come to your house and fuck you, unless you're a tankie shitter that believes in assigned women.

he's a 90's democrat with paleoconservative and right wing populist leanings, I mean, he's not that bad for a republican really, would you rather have Ted Cruz?

So who is thinking us as concept?

Lmao the man is a RINO who was to the left of some really freaky right-wingers like Ted Cruz, Rick Santorum etc. Ever since the 80s the left-wing of the democratic party has always declared the US to be on the edge of "fascism" when the republicans are in power and then shirking away from such labels when there people do the same things when they regain power.

You know how I know you're a newfag? Because, when he was elected this board was celebrating and laughing over the unprecedented amount of liberal salt after the upset.

He is pushing for division, he already tries to act as if he is the only person who is truthful and how everyone should listen to him and everyone else is a liar, he also wants army to "parade" in US states and totally coincidentally mentioned New York and Washington which both voted against him.

You realize how easy he can turn this around to fascism if he tries right? Currently he is slowly trying to Normalize it with his ridiculous comments

Kek

You mean Holla Forums shitposting

You're either a dem operative or a complete autist but one thing you're not is an old fag or even someone whose regularly browsed this site over the last couple months.

you're basically proving his point

If you're literate and have read any books at all you would know that sort of statement is usually made by liberals who have absolutely zero knowledge on fascism and just repeat anything the state propaganda tell them like a fucking drone.

So that must mean you're one of those Reddit operatives or a Holla Forums shill who thinks this board are full of liberals.

...

REMINDER

youtube.com/watch?v=PHQLQ1Rc_Js&list=RDPHQLQ1Rc_Js#t=3

Mods, track this faggot's IP.

well my personal philosophy is that there is the meat of humanity, and the idea of humanity. It's the Ship of Theseus argument for humanity, at what point does one stop being human? At what point are you simply an idea of a human? If you no longer are human but think like a human, does it even matter then?

My view is that humanity is better as a concept than a fact, because humanity, like a philosophy, changes over time. We evolved from single celled organisms to self aware creatures, and that evolution will continue, either through natural genetic changes or technology. At some point, Human Sapiens Sapiens of our current era will end, or at the very least, other subspecies will evolve, when that happens, we will be forced to redefine the concept of humanity in order to remain inclusive and united as people.

This is getting into deep level stuff, but I'm hoping you get the gist of it

...

Not really. If it was ideologically neutral, the prevailing ideology would have no effect. Instead if embodies the ideology of the age.
Now when you've got a good prevailing ideology, that's a virtuous circle, but when you don't then criticizing technology on the basis of underlying ideology it embodies is pretty harmless.