Hello Holla Forums
How do the communist philosopher's on your board justify communism? Communism is inherently against private property, which I've been told many times is a "spook." If nations don't exist, as you say they don't, isn;t this just a justification for exploiting the resources of another country? This seems unethical to me, and I'd like an explanation. It seems as if communism only exists to garner surface level support (redistribution of wealth, taxing "porky"), so that said regime can subtly steal the resources from another country in the "name of the state/Stalin/etc."
Another thing that bothers me is the fact that you argue property rights don't exist, yet call colonialism "exploitation." If property rights don't exist, colonialism is 100% justifiable, since nobody owns any land. Wouldn't this inevitably lead to the richest people taking the most land? Your entire ideology is self-defeating. I'm looking for serious enlightenment.