Anarchist government

So what even is the point of romanticizing this?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror_(Spain)#Early_outbreak_of_violence
youtu.be/Nf_Y4MbUCLY?t=36
twitter.com/AnonBabble

They were defeated by the well trained army with its generals and German/Italian allies.

fucking statists

And Portugal and Morocco

Why was CNT/FAI so vehemently fedora during the Spanish Revolution?

If I recall correctly the church was openly collaborating with reactionary elements. Of course just about anyone trained properly in theory could have predicted this so I don't see why they were so obsessed with running the church out of town before establishing their little totally-not-a-state.

you obviously don't know much of the history of the catholic church's role in Spanish society, otherwise you wouldn't be asking that.

The real problem is that they joined the bourgeois popular front government instead of seizing state power and organising against the counter-revolutionary forces on the republican side.

then they were not anarchists m8

...

Would you rather they just have killed everyone in a great purge during a civil war? Go read some military history and tell me that's a good fucking idea.

so you would prefer them be under the control of private power instead of being collectively owned and operated by the community they were in?

Dumb lelnin hat

They had prisons because the Republic had prisons and Juan Garcia Oliver reformed the prison system as Minister of Justice by abolishing torture and burning the criminal records. If you complain about the prisons then you complain about the Popular Front.

Remember it was also the Popular Front which ended up losing the war, the militias having defeated the coup where it was defeated. The Popular Front refused to arm the anarchists and did practically nothing in response to a coup that had already been predicted by the worker's organisations. Remember it was the disciplined so-called "People's Army" that got stomped by pathetic reactionaries.

All the evidence points to Leninists and collaborationist moderate Cenetistas who should have been kicked out with PestaƱa being responsible for the counterrevolution and for losing the war. Read about Camillo Berneri and the Iron Column.

Sage for low energy bait.

Because they had such cool posters.

anarcho communism is not anarchism and should be refuted as a lead to authoritarian statism, Ancap/agorism/voluntaryism and mutualism is the only form of anarchy that isn't a fake form of anarchy (yes in an ancap society we can have mutualism)

Its an ancap, you all know what to do.

No I just think that it is funny how anarchists ended up having to resort to coercion to get stuff done (and still ended up failing.)

Ancap huh?

Kek, Ancapistan would last 10 minutes before regressing to a state. There's a reason Proudhon said "to critique Capital is to critique the State" - because it's true. There's also a reason that Rothbard said "We are not anarchist, and those who call us that are not on firm etymological ground." - because that's also true. Now take your faux-anarchism and garbage economics and go back to Liberty.

Reminder to all Ancaps that Hayek was chased out of Cambridge for being a retard and continuously loosing in debates to whichever of the "statist" economist he debated, whether that be Sraffa, Keynes or Kalecki.

murray was incorrect in the regards that we shouldn't be called anarchists, capitalism and anarchism fits like a glove

Statists btfo

No they don't. Anarchism was historically a movement that set out to abolish hierarchy. Despite the fact that the only respectable libertarian philosophers such as Nozik btfo any notion of Ancapistan surviving for a prolonged period of time without a state, the concept of "anarcho-capitalistm" doesn't even make sense from a philosophical viewpoint. You are being completely unhistorical just like Rothbard says - you are changing the meaning of anarchism to suit your needs, so you can wear the badge of a greater movement that you had so part in formulating.

Just call it what it is - "stateless" capitalism.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror_(Spain)#Early_outbreak_of_violence


youtu.be/Nf_Y4MbUCLY?t=36

I, for one, salute our ancom gulagers.

Yes, that's literally the historical truth. What's your excuse for the abject failure of every Leninist project?

...

You know I just realized that the whole "statist" schtick is even more annoying when ancoms do it.

How about this ancap classic?

I guess that means there were staytists involved at every corner where anarchism tried to anarchy. Gotta be careful, friend.

The only good statist is the capitalist statist. The Mexican state allows the Zapatistas to run their tourist attraction, and the Danish state allows Freetown Christiania to run their tourist attraction. The bad statists (communists) always tried to sabotage our freedom and you know it.

A lelinist scolding anyone for romanticising a failed attempt at socialism is funny. Now go back to sniffing your mother's panties and worshiping the other debunked fag freudcuck.

How do you think webm related was born? Whenever I see an ancom/libsoc pull "le statism" I know the fag just recently converted from ancap and/or got stuck in the adolescent "authority bad" phase.

Kek

How come commis are always fucking hypocrites?

...

...