Nazbols complain about muslims in europe and the west

Just how retarded are these guys really are??

Other urls found in this thread:

viewpointmag.com/2015/03/23/the-idea-of-muslim-national-communism-on-mirsaid-sultan-galiev/
twitter.com/MaoistRebelNews/status/815448567322202112
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

NazBol ideology was literally started by a Muslim communist.

Holy shit.

viewpointmag.com/2015/03/23/the-idea-of-muslim-national-communism-on-mirsaid-sultan-galiev/

oh great, another retard who gets all his ideas from bbc documentaries

...

Bordiga's theories are anti-Islam.

...

Still you can't help but admire his ingenuity.

because the west shouldn't have been in the middle east in the first place just like the middle east shouldn't be in Europe.
i don't see the contradiction

What's a good Bordiga text? The one on democratic centralism was garbage.

HE SAID "ALLAHU AKHBAR"
I TOLD HIM "DON'T CURSE ME"
BUT BOY YOU NEED PRAYER
I GUESS IT COULDN'T HURT ME
IF IT BRINGS INTO MY KNEEEEEEEEEEES

I don't see the contradiction really, Nazbols aren't neocons, closer to the opposite really. You can be anti immigration and anti imperialist.

Except the Shia refocused on national liberation after getting over the butthurt. Besides it was the Sunnis who have always fucked with the west.

t. edgy socdem

Pathetic tbh. Iran and Hezbollah are based. Shias are mostly peaceful.

I can't help but admire your quads

...

how the hell did leftypol fall for the shias are the good guys meme?
because of a few anti-usa moves?
you really don't know a damn thing about the whole middle east/islam situation at all do you guys?
better to not have an opinion, i think

Umm thats literally irrelevant?

Yes you can.

...

Sacrificing oneself for the good of one's faith/nation is hardly a new idea and Khomeini hardly supported terrorism abroad.

tell that to lebanon

Khomeini (or his underlings - same shit) popularised the whole taqiyya meme by creating the concept of a state of constant conflict - as far as he was concerned a muslim was constantly at war and everyone who supported a system in any way (a taxpayer for example) was a legitimate target.
This was a seismic shift in what was traditional islamic ideas of martial conduct.

Give me a non BBC source for that

You'll have to wait.
I'm slightly drunk and will be hitting the sack soon
Happy New Year btw.

All right I'll check the thread tommorow. Happy new year to you too man

...

SOMEONE WEBM THIS.
twitter.com/MaoistRebelNews/status/815448567322202112

Shia arent burning people alive or some other other edgelordy stuff some of the cray cray sunni jihadists do now (I know hezbollah used to be worse than they are now…)

What a dumb way to analyse things… oh wait you're a nigger what a surprise.

I think this a good starting point
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism

Feels real bad, to be honest.

...

...

kek.
I'm getting drunk again btw.
What did you do for NYE you nazi scumbag?

i'm not the same guy as the nazi.

I thought this was board of leftist, not progressives.