Tell me why you think your version of communism/anarchism would end up like all other historical failures?

How about the first man in space?

The ones that were actually succecful in bringing Africa out of poverty but were killed in coups because muh Truman Doctrine?

Or the reactionary ones that brought it in?

ME

Only a sociopath would intend such an outcome.

Heh

Well, of course. Only sociopaths would buy into the whole "let's genocide all the bourgeois scum, anyone that doesn't agree with me is also a counterrevolutionary fascist pig deserving of death" Communism thing. Communism is about dehumanizing people to rape them, brutally kill them and steal their shit and like rabid daesh niggers.

Communism = Sociopathy

Reminder that lefties are okay with gutting 14 year old girls to death in the name of their ideology. Literally no better than nazis.

I didn't know you could be a communist through a very specific set of events that lead to a neural condition in the personality that mutes empathy and so encourages blind self interest instead of self sacrifice and encourages blind hate while not understanding its hate

I thought muting of empathy was a thing people like you did.

...

Lmao, like clockwork. Commies are a fucking joke.

For someone who two seconds ago had a nazi flag you aren't fooling shit. You can say "M-M-M-M-M-M-M-MUH H-H-H-HOLOHOAX" droolingly all you want, you still allied with Imperial Japan.

for

Thanks for proving my point.

Said the Nazi. Face it, there's no ideology without blood on their hands.

Nazi's starved 1 million people at Leningrad.

You're awful butthurt about the execution of inbred nobles. Might be you feel some sort of kinship there.

Yes it is. The bourgeoisie did not care that they were starving people to death in the English country side, crowding families together in rooms 6 feet high and spreading pestilence through the cots. Why should we care about the tactical murder of the Romanov children?

Unit 731

Fuck off and die

Why do you even oppose such a thing? The extermination of innocents for the creation of "living space" in the east was the core purpose of Not Socialism. Nazis these days just strike me as conservative kiddies who use a swastika because it makes them feel cool…

Reminder anarchists are the only ideological group that have never caused a genocide in history.

Stay mad, nazifags.
Stay mad, nazibols.

Just because all morality is false doesn't mean that you should act like a fucking barbarian. I guess this is why any revolution always has a secondary purge that removes the criminal elements which always end up latching themselves onto the vanguard.

Neither have antinatalist primitivists, to be fair. …Yet.

Communist logic

The feudalist ruling class were despised by the peasants, sure, but I dont really thing "Feudalism" itself was hated in the same way modern leftists hate capitalism. Capitalism set itself up as the inevitable next step of history economically. The tricky thing is that capital is more centralised than feudalism ever was. It's much harder (perhaps even impossible) for socialism to supplant capitalism in the same way it did feudalism.

I can imagine perhaps that the ruling class will make itself so despised even by non-leftists that there will in a sense be a power vacuum that a socialist organisation may be able to exploit.

I was just thinking, the older i get, the more i think pol pot did nothing wrong by killing academics

Because my version of communism starts with killing 6.7 billion people. There will be no one left to complain of genocide!

What did he mean by this?

America is too busy fighting muslims, i think a nuclear powered communist country might have an advantage in this era oddly enough.
Although i can not see any countries going commie at present.

Well, people talk about all the bad stuff communists did, as if capitalist countries haven't committed numerous atrocities.

All countries are born of blood, Rome actually started with a rape

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rape_of_the_Sabine_Women