Why aren't you / Are you a feminist, Leftypol? thread no.234234

The only appropriate reply is I am for the liberation of all working women and sage.

Other urls found in this thread:

mega.nz/#F!DJdkhYTR!gNrR2Hm7we5O0dyfwBHG0g
mega.nz/#F!eUlWRQxR!9LG4fzKLvNTiM0CKgUjqvA
lacanonline.com/index/find-a-lacanian-psychoanalyst/
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/
youtube.com/watch?v=f1F-zysTjWg
youtube.com/channel/UCEC40lz1R5l9TKCsp_ROFeA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I am for the liberation of all people and the abolishment of gender and race. Liberals will die alongside reactionaries and socialist feminists are my comrades.

It's against my self interests for women to be on equal footing with men.

What's this obsession with repeating digits?

...

It's also against your self interest to be a Nazi but you do it anyway

I am a feminist and a meninist too

That would be masculist? (The pair is feminine - masculine.)

Or malenist? Malist? Maleist?

spooky

How come it os so easy to tell how someone has never read stirner

...

I'm an egalitarian but never a Feminist nor a MGTOW.

also SAGE.

The concept of self-interest is spooky af, tho, it's peak bourgeois individualism: "I, the supreme and rational self in command can tell what I need, want, and desire, so out of my way mein property!"

Meanwhile in reality: what you want always selects from what is available, what and how is produced and based on how it is (in a historically contingent way) distributed, what you need were always some few basic things (apart from social interaction – the most complex of your needs, having nothing to do with your polished ego), and what you desire is what the Other desires anyway.

The first sentence is correct, however I dont see how your second idea of assigning ghe ego unlimited imaginary powers is valid, the man takes the world as it is is one of the initial quotes of the ego and its own, never are we implying that the egomcan trascend reality

If you are trying to imply my dsires are driven by outsider forces, that is highly debateable, as not everyone responds to marketing equally

saeg

a.k.a. "why egoism can't be revolutionary"

I'm not implying, I'm articulating the things I want to say. The Other is not an "outsider force," its the symbolic regime (language) particularized for each speaking subject, and I truly doubt marketing can create more than excitations and misnomers for your desire proper.

Feminism is female supremacy. Why was this thread made?

Freudfag, your post always intrigue me. Should I read more economic text (was gonna read Sraffa next) or read the Clinical Introduction to Lacan.

...

Feminism is about breaking down the oppressive family structure that only reinforces capitalism. As long as nuclear families exist capitalism is inevitable. It's a vital part of class struggle.

Why not both?

Meme's aside, don't just jump from book to book frantically. Have a study plan, and always have at least two consecutive books in the same discipline, preferably going from easier to harder, or from one area to another. Take notes, and at the end of the study phase (your 2-3-… books) re-read them.

You can learn a lot about yourself, modern theory, linguistics, politics, capitalism, ideology, anthropology etc. through Lacanian texts, so I'd say they are essential for 21st century communists.

1997 → 2007 → 1995:
mega.nz/#F!DJdkhYTR!gNrR2Hm7we5O0dyfwBHG0g

Study help:
mega.nz/#F!eUlWRQxR!9LG4fzKLvNTiM0CKgUjqvA

Find a Lacanian analyst:
lacanonline.com/index/find-a-lacanian-psychoanalyst/

You are talking about communism, not feminism.
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/

Right now I'm finishing Volume 1 of Capital, and then my "bus book" is The Metaphysics by Aristotle since I just finished Plato and the pre-socratics.

I have so much to read, so little time.

Create more time. Close your browser.

...

I always thought "marxists try to destroy the family" was just a paranoid meme. Thanks for getting that straight.

Marxists can't decide whether they need more "bodies" for the revolution, or that children are oppressive to the working class.

Not even a fucking egoist but I'm sick of the meme lords on here, this is the problem with this place, pseudo intellectualism that draws on memes rather than books for its sustenance

How many of you have actually read feminist theory?

I have, even the dreaded Crenshaw

Freudfag is an asshurt lelinist who is mad no one takes his debunked bullshit seriously. Not reading books is the issue of the other lelinist, muke.

The nuclear family is awful and deserves to die. Non-nuclear families are OK.

how cunt

Feminism needs socialism to be at all significant to let alone achieve women's liberation.
Socialism doesn't need something which comes naturally to it to achieve said things.


I've read Goldman, Marsden and the SCUM Manifesto.

Where is that .gif from OP? seems like an interesting documentary

Since you always post this have you ever been under psychoanalysis yourself?

Also I suggest you add these links to your stump post

youtube.com/watch?v=f1F-zysTjWg

youtube.com/channel/UCEC40lz1R5l9TKCsp_ROFeA

Also is Jung a Fascist?